Have you used carbon fiber and went back to wood?

that makes a total of three. i've searched this pretty closely and there a very few selling cf shafts at/near the $250 point. That one's that are are getting pretty mixed reviews for both playability and QC. you have the tickle's? any good? he the same guy that makes the bucket polisher?
AZB member Newsheriffintwn, makes a CF shaft 11.8 or 12.4mm for $300 and some gorgeous cues.
 
Miscues are
- tip related.
- chalk related, or
- edge of cb related.

But they shouldn't be shaft material related.
I totally agree. I'd always played with a one piece tip and played very confidently at the edge of the cue ball, left, right and at the very bottom edge. With CF I've yet to find a tip I like that has the hit and sound that I desire that isn't laminated. It's as though if you don't go with a laminated tip these days there are very few great choices. So for me it's the combination of CF and a laminated tip. Blech. I recall hearing a Jeremy Jones commentary in a match where he sais he miscues a ton more with laminated tips and with that I tooooootally agree. The combination of CF + miscuing with laminated tips has created a hesitation in my stroke.....a lack of confidence....that I can't get past. I wonder what leathers the tip makers use. I may have to seek out a water buffalo and snatch apiece of his hide.
 
1st shaft I had was a meucci red dot, then went to a black dot, back to red. Both seemed ok , but they wasnt no levels above a good standard grade A maple shaft , granted at that time I was a novice at best, but it was still apparent that the bullseye shafts were a gimmick. After that I went to a 314-1, stuck with that for a year or 2, went to Ob, hated the mush feel, went back to 314. Bought a Z-1 stuck with that for 3-4yrs , alternating between that and the 314. Tried a ob-2 still didnt like how soft it was ; swapped the tip to med/hard , still didnt like it. Tried a ob classic,kinda like that, being that shaft was stiff but like the 314 and z lacked feel /feedback. Bought a 314² than a z², found myself liking the z² more .
Sold my 314¹, Z¹, ob classic, as well as the 314², by this time the meucci shafts were long gone.
That Z² won me a City Championship , and 10s of thousands in tourney money thru-out the next 6-7yrs. Regardless of settling on the Z² , I always thought it lacked feel, and was back on the hunt for the perfect blend of ld, stiffness & feel.
I had a shaft made that was grade A maple , reduced front end mass, &
ferrule-less at a 12.4mm tip. I found that shaft was virtually equal in low deflection as the z², but had more feel which I loved.
Some of you vets likely remember me amping it up, I was on the move towards marketing the shaft, under the name "Ghost" LD shaft. Life was still happening , had 3 kids in a stint of 6 yrs , and time & funds were getting tight. So the Ghost shaft never got launched due to lack of money and time at that point in my life. Pool in general took a back seat for 6/7yrs .
Fast forward , kids are older , business is doing good enough, and I got more time to myself, so I got reacquainted with pool. Once I got started back up , the latest and greatest shafts out there were/are the revo 12.4 & 11.8
(insert whatever cf shaft suits you) , so I purchase the both of them.
Upon my return Ive incorporated more drills, and have fine tuned my game , the hiatus kinda help me start brand new , drop bad habits & stick to fundamentals , which in turn means more consistency.
What I found with these revos is they are stiff and hit harder , but still lack the feel of a good quality maple shaft. As for the lowest deflection thru cf shafts , jurys still out on that claim imo.
None the less ,with the proper mechanics in place, it dont matter what shafts on the cue , any table is able to be cleared so long as control is consistent.
I say all that to say this , you can make your rounds dropping money on all the latest gimmicks & claims to instant improvement, but the fact is, it all boils down to your mechanics, and what tools you find are most predictable & comfortable for you.


--TL//DR--
The key is consistency through your mechanics, that consistency starts and ends with you, . Lastly ,there are no short cuts, practice makes perfect.
 
Last edited:
Interested in people's thoughts that used a LD carbon fiber shaft and moved back to either solid maple or a radial wood shaft. What did they not like about the CF shaft?
Thanks

I like the way that the old Ob shafts play. I decided to play with those before I go after carbon fiber, but I have played with them.

I tend to like the 12.4 to thicker shafts. I have played wtih an 11.7 shaft and it played like an iron pipe.

I would like to play a month with a carbon fiber that isn't a McDermott Defy. It hits great but wears me out it dampens down the shock
so much.

I did go back to regular wood for awhile and I preferred the old OB 13mm shaft.
 
Im an old school one peice tip guy be it lepro triangle Waterbuffalo schon factory tips ....ect ect but ....

About the miscues with laminated tips...
I've noticed alot of them have a hard sharp edge From the sidewall to the hitting crown...I shouldn't even have to say this but knock that shit out with a file rolling the shaft on your leg wile sitting... put a nice soft edge round crown on your tip. People always look at their tip when they miss cue. But 90% of them don't have the right shape on their tip. The very edge of their tip is like a 90 degree corner of course they miscues with hard English all the time
 
Soften or round the edge more with a file or a strip of wood with sandpaper glued to it.
The photo below is too sharp of a corner IMO. And I've seen a lot worse than this
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221217-103052_Google.jpg
    Screenshot_20221217-103052_Google.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 105
This is what your tips edge should look like. I never miscue unless I'm drunk or am trying a stupid extreme Hudini shot. NOTICE HOW THE EDGE IS SOFT AND NOT A HARD CORNER. Usually I keep this kind of info to myself but I'll share with u guys....this littlest of thing makes all the difference.
 

Attachments

  • 20221217_103815.jpg
    20221217_103815.jpg
    138.4 KB · Views: 125
I’ve been finishing CF shafts for several years now and I find the people who shot with a low deflection shaft before have a easier time adjusting to it and people who shot with a solid maple had to do more adjusting. BIRKY Shafts
 
This is what your tips edge should look like. I never miscue unless I'm drunk or am trying a stupid extreme Hudini shot. NOTICE HOW THE EDGE IS SOFT AND NOT A HARD CORNER. Usually I keep this kind of info to myself but I'll share with u guys....this littlest of thing makes all the difference.
I agree with the rounded edge. I‘ve been experimenting with this and found I can get further out on the cue ball for english and draws, especially with a softer tip and the newer engineered chalks. I actually try to go to the radius of half the tip diameter so that the edge is tangential to the cue axis, and have been trying one tip where the burnished edge is conical and decreases diameter as you get toward the end of the tip, so effectively a smaller diameter at the tip end.
 
and have been trying one tip where the burnished edge is conical and decreases diameter as you get toward the end of the tip, so effectively a smaller diameter at the tip end.
I've done this before. Just go at a slight angle when trimming the sides then burnish Seems the cut down on mushrooming. Doesn't really make a difference to me. If I want a 12mm tip I grab a 12mm shaft. If I want a 12.5 mm tip I grab a 12.5 mm shaft. I have and use shafts from 11.5 to 13mm. Just depends on the table and cloth type and how much I've been playing. I have found that right around 12.5 is a real sweet spot (12.25 to 12.75) for most conditions. 11.5mm is hard to controll unless u have been playing a lot of hours or at least some every day with it. and 13mm can be hard to get the finess needed for bar box 8 ball
 
I had a Pechauer carbon fiber shaft and didn't like the feel and hit, of course very subjective matters. Then I tried a Revo (didn't buy it --borrowed it for a while), and found the same issues. Sold the Pechauer and went back to wood. I like the feel, the sound and the hit of wood. Very happy to have tried CF and absolutely nothing wrong with the Pechauer version. Just ain't my bag baby.
interesting. I specifically went with the pechauer because i was reading that it didnt have that metallic "ping" and strange feel like some other cf, and was the closest cf shaft in feel to wood, and that has been my experience with it. I always played with the mcdermott g-core shaft prior, and didnt really experience any transition pains. The only thing i didnt like about it was the white lettering fill on its logo, which i tooth-picked out. To each their own.
 
I tried many different CF shafts, but after using a wood shaft for years, they all felt dead to me. I guess I was used to the vibrations from wood. I read about the Hsunami kielwood shaft and ordered one of those. It gives the same feedback as any wood shaft, but does reduce deflection as the torrefaction process removes the moisture and sugar from the shaft.

-dj
 
Yes.
Tried revo, pechauer, cuetec, mezz and go customs. Of all the cuetec was the best but for some reason I don’t play any better with them.

I still play a 57” vintage dufferin conversion sneaky pete.
 
I went to CF because I can buy another that will look and play the exact same in one day if something was to happen to it
That's an interesting point. I might have missed the discussion on this topic if it already happened, but is it a given that CF shafts with equal parameters (and by one brand, i.e. "same" shafts) do play equally the same in reality?
 
not a very informed opinion, but a guy i know let me hit a few balls with his CF recently, a revo i believe. i had never used one before. I play with an ob1+ and comparatively, it felt like the revo didnt provide any feedback on the hit, as if it was a shock absorber. i also didnt care for the feel of the CF on my skin. i played one rack of balls and handed it back, not long enough to get any kind of performance comparison but enough to know that i didn’t like it.
 
I bought a CF shaft and play with it now and again. It's interesting and I'll keep it in the rack at home along with the others. It hasn't become my favorite or my "go to" but you never know.
 
That's an interesting point. I might have missed the discussion on this topic if it already happened, but is it a given that CF shafts with equal parameters (and by one brand, i.e. "same" shafts) do play equally the same in reality?
I have 3 cynergy shafts and I can't tell the difference.
 
I've be a 314 guy for 25 years (on a custom butt with a snooker bevel on the back). I still use Ash 9.5mm for Snooker. Tried a bunch of CF cues. I don't see much improvement in LD over 314-3. In some cases worse. Don't like the balance. Very front light and they must add weight to back to achieve overall desired weight. Also I'm used to and like 12.75mm and all I have seen are under/over this. Thus I will pass. The only upside I see is durability. The price point is also not to my liking. I expect More for More. I know a little about manufacturing. I would bet that 314 costs Predator more money to make than Revo and lets not get into a discussion about R&D costs.
 
I’m watching the 42nd us open between Duel and Fuller. Fuller is using a Carbon shaft. I know today he’s using a Z shaft
 
Back
Top