Hey Bill S

C. Carl McConnell

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
September 14, 2011


My apologies for reporting that the Juan De Fuca Pool League was operating under the umbrella of the Peking Pool League. That was apparently not true! At that time!

To all of you BCAPL lovers out there here is some more information for you to chew on.

I contacted the Peking Pool League about them providing an umbrella for the Juan De Fuca Pool League and the following was their response, “There were two leagues last year which had nothing to do with each other and still don't.” The response of someone that should know. That places the BCAPL squarely in the position of being fraudulent by issuing sanctioning to an undersized league playing an unwritten game without written rules!

The BCAPL can no longer claim innocents when it comes to the sanctioning of the Juan De Fuca Pool League #263 in 2010, 2011 league year. They simply hoped that it would go undiscovered and unpublished.

When it became apparent that this league would not be able to meet the BCAPL rules for sanctioning, as stated on their website over ten times, they decided to fraudulently accept them, for the second year, and provide them sanctioning, hoping to keep it quite and unnoticed by the remainder of their membership especially those that had been refused membership on the numbers. 24 player members on 5, 4 man teams is just a tad short of the 30 playing members on 6, 4 man teams required by the BCAPL rules expressed on their website. All of which would have gone unnoticed by me until the league operator illegally voted the calling of the 9-Ball in as a rule and I hit the website. We all know what happened after that!

All of this and my notification to you here and in Port Townsend, WA seems to have left the BCAPL with no out except to de-sanction me in hopes that that would quite me, HA, HA! Never happen!

This is, beside the fraudulent manor in which they treat their playing rules where the operative word is ALL. But, they got their money anyway all $655.00 (+) of it. That is plus the money collected by the Peking Pool League membership for eleven weeks of play. Lets face it money is the operative word here and the most important thing to the BCAPL’s collective nature, anything goes!

I was told once to follow the relationships of people, like cousins, uncles and aunts then dollars etc. Except for the dollars that’s not possible in this case, but, it almost seems to be the case where Bill Stock & Mark Griffin the league operator and her husband are concerned. Does anyone else know?

C. Carl McConnell
 
September 14, 2011


My apologies for reporting that the Juan De Fuca Pool League was operating under the umbrella of the Peking Pool League. That was apparently not true! At that time!

To all of you BCAPL lovers out there here is some more information for you to chew on.

I contacted the Peking Pool League about them providing an umbrella for the Juan De Fuca Pool League and the following was their response, “There were two leagues last year which had nothing to do with each other and still don't.” The response of someone that should know. That places the BCAPL squarely in the position of being fraudulent by issuing sanctioning to an undersized league playing an unwritten game without written rules!

The BCAPL can no longer claim innocents when it comes to the sanctioning of the Juan De Fuca Pool League #263 in 2010, 2011 league year. They simply hoped that it would go undiscovered and unpublished.

When it became apparent that this league would not be able to meet the BCAPL rules for sanctioning, as stated on their website over ten times, they decided to fraudulently accept them, for the second year, and provide them sanctioning, hoping to keep it quite and unnoticed by the remainder of their membership especially those that had been refused membership on the numbers. 24 player members on 5, 4 man teams is just a tad short of the 30 playing members on 6, 4 man teams required by the BCAPL rules expressed on their website. All of which would have gone unnoticed by me until the league operator illegally voted the calling of the 9-Ball in as a rule and I hit the website. We all know what happened after that!

All of this and my notification to you here and in Port Townsend, WA seems to have left the BCAPL with no out except to de-sanction me in hopes that that would quite me, HA, HA! Never happen!

This is, beside the fraudulent manor in which they treat their playing rules where the operative word is ALL. But, they got their money anyway all $655.00 (+) of it. That is plus the money collected by the Peking Pool League membership for eleven weeks of play. Lets face it money is the operative word here and the most important thing to the BCAPL’s collective nature, anything goes!

I was told once to follow the relationships of people, like cousins, uncles and aunts then dollars etc. Except for the dollars that’s not possible in this case, but, it almost seems to be the case where Bill Stock & Mark Griffin the league operator and her husband are concerned. Does anyone else know?

C. Carl McConnell

The question is does anyone care? You got booted, why don't you go start your own league and run it your way.
 
September 14, 2011


My apologies for reporting that the Juan De Fuca Pool League was operating under the umbrella of the Peking Pool League. That was apparently not true! At that time!

To all of you BCAPL lovers out there here is some more information for you to chew on.

I contacted the Peking Pool League about them providing an umbrella for the Juan De Fuca Pool League and the following was their response, “There were two leagues last year which had nothing to do with each other and still don't.” The response of someone that should know. That places the BCAPL squarely in the position of being fraudulent by issuing sanctioning to an undersized league playing an unwritten game without written rules!

The BCAPL can no longer claim innocents when it comes to the sanctioning of the Juan De Fuca Pool League #263 in 2010, 2011 league year. They simply hoped that it would go undiscovered and unpublished.

When it became apparent that this league would not be able to meet the BCAPL rules for sanctioning, as stated on their website over ten times, they decided to fraudulently accept them, for the second year, and provide them sanctioning, hoping to keep it quite and unnoticed by the remainder of their membership especially those that had been refused membership on the numbers. 24 player members on 5, 4 man teams is just a tad short of the 30 playing members on 6, 4 man teams required by the BCAPL rules expressed on their website. All of which would have gone unnoticed by me until the league operator illegally voted the calling of the 9-Ball in as a rule and I hit the website. We all know what happened after that!

All of this and my notification to you here and in Port Townsend, WA seems to have left the BCAPL with no out except to de-sanction me in hopes that that would quite me, HA, HA! Never happen!

This is, beside the fraudulent manor in which they treat their playing rules where the operative word is ALL. But, they got their money anyway all $655.00 (+) of it. That is plus the money collected by the Peking Pool League membership for eleven weeks of play. Lets face it money is the operative word here and the most important thing to the BCAPL’s collective nature, anything goes!

I was told once to follow the relationships of people, like cousins, uncles and aunts then dollars etc. Except for the dollars that’s not possible in this case, but, it almost seems to be the case where Bill Stock & Mark Griffin the league operator and her husband are concerned. Does anyone else know?

C. Carl McConnell



I like this idea also.
Start your own pool league.
randyg
 
This idiot got booted out of a BCA lague a while back becasuse the league operator said he was undermining the league trying to get people to change the rules. He tried to appeal to the league owners and they stood by the league operator. He made a big fuss on here(http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=228017&highlight=stork)
and now he's back again.

Sorry, I started to read some of this, then I dozed off and got logged out.........:boring2:

I remember this story now. A bunch of members derailed one of his threads with music video links. LOL, that was a good time.

Thanks for the refresher, spktur. Greenie for you.

Carry on........
 
Someone in Carl's area needs to print up his entire original BS thread about his being booted from the BCA and give it to the league operator for any other league he may try to join. If someone was trying to join my league and I saw how they reacted to his prior issue I would boot them before they even started.

Let it go little guy, no one gives a flying f*ck.
 
Mickey:

It's simple:

BCAPL = [B]ecause [C]arl [A]in't [P]laying for [L]ife.

...i.e. the OP is banned from all BCAPL events *for life*.

-Sean

Because
Carl's an
Ass?



Booting
Carl's
Ass?


Hhmmmm, it's a conspiracy, they were always planning on kicking him out, the acronyms are too easy!
 
Beat a dead horse

I’ll beat my own dead horse right after the BCAPL beats theirs.
By the way did anyone check out the item about sanctioning a league with only 24 players? 5 teams of 4 players on the Internet? That’s right the Juan De Fuca Pool League a BCAPL screw up, or was it an attempt at something else, like lining their pockets. For some people any amount of money is an adequate excuse for Internet Fraud, I understand that they did this also in Port Angeles their very first year.
Now, how about accepting some responsibility for the fraud of the BCAPL yourself by admitting that your support is and continues to be instrumental in this fraud? Read my previous very truthful posts and your comments. Perhaps you’ll reconsider.
Thank You,
C. Carl McConnell
 
I’ll beat my own dead horse right after the BCAPL beats theirs.
By the way did anyone check out the item about sanctioning a league with only 24 players? 5 teams of 4 players on the Internet? That’s right the Juan De Fuca Pool League a BCAPL screw up, or was it an attempt at something else, like lining their pockets. For some people any amount of money is an adequate excuse for Internet Fraud, I understand that they did this also in Port Angeles their very first year.
Now, how about accepting some responsibility for the fraud of the BCAPL yourself by admitting that your support is and continues to be instrumental in this fraud? Read my previous very truthful posts and your comments. Perhaps you’ll reconsider.
Thank You,
C. Carl McConnell

Done, still wish you would eff off.
 
I’ll beat my own dead horse right after the BCAPL beats theirs.
By the way did anyone check out the item about sanctioning a league with only 24 players? 5 teams of 4 players on the Internet? That’s right the Juan De Fuca Pool League a BCAPL screw up, or was it an attempt at something else, like lining their pockets. For some people any amount of money is an adequate excuse for Internet Fraud, I understand that they did this also in Port Angeles their very first year.
Now, how about accepting some responsibility for the fraud of the BCAPL yourself by admitting that your support is and continues to be instrumental in this fraud? Read my previous very truthful posts and your comments. Perhaps you’ll reconsider.
Thank You,
C. Carl McConnell

I only have one question....do you putt from the rough? It doesn't matter to me, I'm just curious. Thank you for your time with considering a reply.
 
I’ll beat my own dead horse right after the BCAPL beats theirs.
By the way did anyone check out the item about sanctioning a league with only 24 players? 5 teams of 4 players on the Internet? That’s right the Juan De Fuca Pool League a BCAPL screw up, or was it an attempt at something else, like lining their pockets. For some people any amount of money is an adequate excuse for Internet Fraud, I understand that they did this also in Port Angeles their very first year.
Now, how about accepting some responsibility for the fraud of the BCAPL yourself by admitting that your support is and continues to be instrumental in this fraud? Read my previous very truthful posts and your comments. Perhaps you’ll reconsider.
Thank You,
C. Carl McConnell


I for one will sleep much better tonight. I was really really worried that those crazy folks that run that Juan De Fuca Pool League were on the up-and-up. BUT it sounds like they are up to their old antics again. When will they ever learn??? The sad thing is, I knew Juan De Fuca and he was one heck of nice guy. He used to be involved in a nation wide badminton league if I'm thinking of the right guy. Or was it lawn jarts, prior to them being banned? Can't quite remember...

Oh well, thanks for the update.
 
Nobody cares what you say until you use words like, "fraud."

You're probably even money for the BCAPL to forcibly stop your stupid talk.

Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
 
September 14, 2011


My apologies for reporting that the Juan De Fuca Pool League was operating under the umbrella of the Peking Pool League. That was apparently not true! At that time!

To all of you BCAPL lovers out there here is some more information for you to chew on.

I contacted the Peking Pool League about them providing an umbrella for the Juan De Fuca Pool League and the following was their response, “There were two leagues last year which had nothing to do with each other and still don't.” The response of someone that should know. That places the BCAPL squarely in the position of being fraudulent by issuing sanctioning to an undersized league playing an unwritten game without written rules!

The BCAPL can no longer claim innocents when it comes to the sanctioning of the Juan De Fuca Pool League #263 in 2010, 2011 league year. They simply hoped that it would go undiscovered and unpublished.

When it became apparent that this league would not be able to meet the BCAPL rules for sanctioning, as stated on their website over ten times, they decided to fraudulently accept them, for the second year, and provide them sanctioning, hoping to keep it quite and unnoticed by the remainder of their membership especially those that had been refused membership on the numbers. 24 player members on 5, 4 man teams is just a tad short of the 30 playing members on 6, 4 man teams required by the BCAPL rules expressed on their website. All of which would have gone unnoticed by me until the league operator illegally voted the calling of the 9-Ball in as a rule and I hit the website. We all know what happened after that!

All of this and my notification to you here and in Port Townsend, WA seems to have left the BCAPL with no out except to de-sanction me in hopes that that would quite me, HA, HA! Never happen!

This is, beside the fraudulent manor in which they treat their playing rules where the operative word is ALL. But, they got their money anyway all $655.00 (+) of it. That is plus the money collected by the Peking Pool League membership for eleven weeks of play. Lets face it money is the operative word here and the most important thing to the BCAPL’s collective nature, anything goes!

I was told once to follow the relationships of people, like cousins, uncles and aunts then dollars etc. Except for the dollars that’s not possible in this case, but, it almost seems to be the case where Bill Stock & Mark Griffin the league operator and her husband are concerned. Does anyone else know?

C. Carl McConnell

No words are necessary: This!
 
No fair. My employers IT department has added AZBilliard in their blocking software, so I can't play "reference the song" all day to have fun with C.Carl...
 
Back
Top