September 14, 2011
My apologies for reporting that the Juan De Fuca Pool League was operating under the umbrella of the Peking Pool League. That was apparently not true! At that time!
To all of you BCAPL lovers out there here is some more information for you to chew on.
I contacted the Peking Pool League about them providing an umbrella for the Juan De Fuca Pool League and the following was their response, “There were two leagues last year which had nothing to do with each other and still don't.” The response of someone that should know. That places the BCAPL squarely in the position of being fraudulent by issuing sanctioning to an undersized league playing an unwritten game without written rules!
The BCAPL can no longer claim innocents when it comes to the sanctioning of the Juan De Fuca Pool League #263 in 2010, 2011 league year. They simply hoped that it would go undiscovered and unpublished.
When it became apparent that this league would not be able to meet the BCAPL rules for sanctioning, as stated on their website over ten times, they decided to fraudulently accept them, for the second year, and provide them sanctioning, hoping to keep it quite and unnoticed by the remainder of their membership especially those that had been refused membership on the numbers. 24 player members on 5, 4 man teams is just a tad short of the 30 playing members on 6, 4 man teams required by the BCAPL rules expressed on their website. All of which would have gone unnoticed by me until the league operator illegally voted the calling of the 9-Ball in as a rule and I hit the website. We all know what happened after that!
All of this and my notification to you here and in Port Townsend, WA seems to have left the BCAPL with no out except to de-sanction me in hopes that that would quite me, HA, HA! Never happen!
This is, beside the fraudulent manor in which they treat their playing rules where the operative word is ALL. But, they got their money anyway all $655.00 (+) of it. That is plus the money collected by the Peking Pool League membership for eleven weeks of play. Lets face it money is the operative word here and the most important thing to the BCAPL’s collective nature, anything goes!
I was told once to follow the relationships of people, like cousins, uncles and aunts then dollars etc. Except for the dollars that’s not possible in this case, but, it almost seems to be the case where Bill Stock & Mark Griffin the league operator and her husband are concerned. Does anyone else know?
C. Carl McConnell
My apologies for reporting that the Juan De Fuca Pool League was operating under the umbrella of the Peking Pool League. That was apparently not true! At that time!
To all of you BCAPL lovers out there here is some more information for you to chew on.
I contacted the Peking Pool League about them providing an umbrella for the Juan De Fuca Pool League and the following was their response, “There were two leagues last year which had nothing to do with each other and still don't.” The response of someone that should know. That places the BCAPL squarely in the position of being fraudulent by issuing sanctioning to an undersized league playing an unwritten game without written rules!
The BCAPL can no longer claim innocents when it comes to the sanctioning of the Juan De Fuca Pool League #263 in 2010, 2011 league year. They simply hoped that it would go undiscovered and unpublished.
When it became apparent that this league would not be able to meet the BCAPL rules for sanctioning, as stated on their website over ten times, they decided to fraudulently accept them, for the second year, and provide them sanctioning, hoping to keep it quite and unnoticed by the remainder of their membership especially those that had been refused membership on the numbers. 24 player members on 5, 4 man teams is just a tad short of the 30 playing members on 6, 4 man teams required by the BCAPL rules expressed on their website. All of which would have gone unnoticed by me until the league operator illegally voted the calling of the 9-Ball in as a rule and I hit the website. We all know what happened after that!
All of this and my notification to you here and in Port Townsend, WA seems to have left the BCAPL with no out except to de-sanction me in hopes that that would quite me, HA, HA! Never happen!
This is, beside the fraudulent manor in which they treat their playing rules where the operative word is ALL. But, they got their money anyway all $655.00 (+) of it. That is plus the money collected by the Peking Pool League membership for eleven weeks of play. Lets face it money is the operative word here and the most important thing to the BCAPL’s collective nature, anything goes!
I was told once to follow the relationships of people, like cousins, uncles and aunts then dollars etc. Except for the dollars that’s not possible in this case, but, it almost seems to be the case where Bill Stock & Mark Griffin the league operator and her husband are concerned. Does anyone else know?
C. Carl McConnell
