One of the last major issues I have left to tackle is that I sometimes hit the cueball too hard. I do this a lot when I'm trying to break up a straight pool rack, especially when I'm playing on bar tables. If I'm not perfect the OB will rattle out.
Is there a rule of thumb for maximum cueball speed, or something to that effect?
It's called hitting the ball at "pocket speed." You will hear pros use this term occasionally. Basically it means hitting the ball at the correct speed for the pocket to accept it. Hit it too hard and it will often rattle. I'm certain you can hit the ball at this speed and still break out the rack. You don't really want to hit the rack too hard anyway. You just want to do enough to break out some balls and keep the cue ball in play.
I sound like an expert and I've never even run 100 balls, but I knew a few guys who had. Some pretty decent Straight Pool players like Sigel, Mizerak, Rempe, Hopkins and Varner. There used to be so many good straight pool players. It seemed like they all grew up in the Northeast with a few exceptions. Dallas West in Rockford, Jeff Carter in Beloit, WI, Dan Louie in Seattle, Dick Lane from Texas and a few others. But back East we had Marino, Mataya, Margo, Fusco, Martin, Butera and a few others I'm probably forgetting. These guys were all top flight 14.1 men. I'd make Miz number one and Sigel number two from that generation. They dominated. All the rest are real close in ability, hard to pick between Hopkins, Rempe, Varner, Margo, Martin, West and Butera. Pretty strong second echelon here. I'm glad I got to see them all play. I always felt like they were never going to miss a ball. When they did I was shocked.
Some capsules:
Mizerak - by far the most powerful stroke, he could shoot the cue ball through a wall. Knew the game and all it's nuances, and like Mosconi he was not about to let anyone beat him. Like Earl at 9-Ball, Steve simply had a higher speed at 14.1 than anyone else.
Sigel - A straight pool machine, he could run balls all day and never look like he was working that hard, Just kind of nonchalantly go through the rack, shrugging his shoulders now and then and maybe smirking a time or two, when he felt like he got an inch out of line. Smart like Steve, maybe the only difference was Miz's superior execution of all shots.
Hopkins - Used that short, choppy stroke to perfection. It looked bullet proof and it was. Just as smart and nearly as good as our first two, but didn't put together as many high runs or as consistently.
Martin - He got every last ounce out of his God given ability. An overachiever, Ray had to work hard to reach the high level he attained. You could tell he was working when he was out there, but his concentration may have been the best of anyone.
Butera - The Godzilla of long ball runners. In a super long challenge match he was unbeatable. Not even Mizerak was the favorite here. Lou might hit you with a couple of 200's back to back. In one race to 150 he was beatable because he often disdained the safety and fired away at some very tough shots.
Varner - Another steady Eddie, played a very controlled methodical game, content to let his opponent make a mistake, so he could pounce. Kind of like he plays One Pocket too. Nick could wear a guy out with his patience. Plus he shot good when cold and under pressure.
Margo - Very flashy style, liked to shoot dramatic and exciting shots, like combos and kisses from out of the pack. Capable of beating anyone at anytime, quit while he was on top. Petey had it all; game, style and was a crowd pleaser as well. People liked to pull for him.
Rempe - Another very steady player, who took advantage of every opportunity. Always took the right shot, never gave away anything. Had a little trouble closing out a match sometimes, but that's about it.
West - Super solid stance, got really locked in on all his shots. No real weaknesses other than the same problem Rempe had winning the big ones. One or two uncharacteristic mistakes often proved costly.
Marino, Mataya, Lane and Fusco were all quite capable of beating anyone on this list, just not as often as they might lose to these same players. Perennial contenders who usually finished high up in the final standings. Same goes for Carter and Louie when they played.
In a full field of 64 players in a World Championship, easily half the field were high level Straight Pool players, capable of 100 ball runs. And many of the other guys were the 50 and 60 ball runners, who might break off a 70 or 80 once in a while. I think overall the fields were a little deeper back then and to win a World Straight Pool Championship really meant something. Nowadays it's hard to get sixteen good players together.