Cornerman said:Thanks. I mean, that's what I thought.
Sniper and LastTwo, you answered what I was thinking. That he looks like he's on his way to be one of the head of the pack.
SJM, it's not that I disagree with you, it's just that I watched him in person a few times and I don't get that same "elite" feeling apparently. Maybe I haven't seen him in top form. And I know I keep talking about the BCA like it's a cakewalk, but it's tough to point to that event when they have the easiest equipment year after year.
When people talk about controlled, mechanical, within himself etc., he certainly is all of that, but the elite of those words IMO is Fong-Pang Chao, who won again at the Challenge of Champions. When he's in his groove, which seems to be every time I watch him live, that guy exudes eliteness. That's what I'm talking about. Maybe one day, I'll have the pleasure of seeing it in Hohmann. I just haven't yet, and I've watched him play more than I've seen Chao. That's why I'm asking if I've missed something. I think you're telling me I have.
Fred
9balldiva said:Not amused!
azbilliards=pool website...I'd think most people would know that's what I am talking about. No hard feelings, just not nice!
Cornerman said:SJM, it's not that I disagree with you, it's just that I watched him in person a few times and I don't get that same "elite" feeling apparently. Maybe I haven't seen him in top form. And I know I keep talking about the BCA like it's a cakewalk, but it's tough to point to that event when they have the easiest equipment year after year.
LastTwo said:I would love to see a marathon ahead-set between Yang and Manalo for some serious money. Who else would pay to see that, huh?
lewdo26 said:You also seem to think of Bustamante as an elite player, but *Bustamante* has no majors under his belt. Hohmann does.
I guess the question is, what is your standard for "elite"?
LastTwo said:Are you saying you've ran 400 balls a few times on a pool table?![]()
Cornerman said:This is a good question. And it will end up being a circular thread. At any tournament today, you normally can pluck off 4-5 names that are favored to win. Alex, Francisco, and Efren always get picked. When they were healthy, Buddy and Nick. Earl will be picked in any 9-ball event, even though he has dropped a touch. Archer was always a pick in the 90's and has been showing strength of late. Chao seems to be able to win the Challenge of Champions any time he wants.
So, that's why I asked. At what point did Hohmann join this list? Don't answer... I got my answer. He's one of the best "newcomers." He's proven in Europe to be a top all-around player including multi wins in 14.1 and 8-ball. He won the World's a few years ago, and should have by now proven that it was no fluke. He bageled Archer in the finals of the BCA Open this year. Only skeptics like me for some reason aren't ready to put him in the top field yet. As I've said previously, I only base my reasoning on recent events that I've watched him play in person. I felt he was clearly out-classed.
Maybe next year, I'll be ready to give him the elite status that others have already given him.
Fred
Cornerman said:No doubt. But... Earl and Schmidt have 400 ball runs. Nobody is talking about Schmidt like they are Thorsten. Engert had a 400 ball run, and wasn't a threat at the US 14.1 Open.
And I know it will sound like an insult, but is the European 8-ball Championship a true test? Do they play 8-ball in Europe? (That's a serious question).
And, as Colin Colenso's post should have shown, prowess at 14.1 can be helpful, but you have to be an 8-ball player to win at 8-ball. Unless you're Efren. And Thorsten is no Efren.
It's not true that just because you're good at 14.1, that you'll be good at 8-ball. They're too different, and have different foci when it comes to running out.
Fred
9balldiva said:Is it hard to believe someone not on the pro circuit can do it?? I was being completely sarcastic...my high run is probably somehwhere around 80-100, and that's because I was super determined to prove a man wrong when he said i couldn't pass 50!!
Don't doubt that there are many people out there who can run 400, but never got into to pro circuit.
9balldiva said:Don't doubt that there are many people out there who can run 400, but never got into to pro circuit.
Cornerman said:Agreed.
With regard to 8-Ball, my own experience has told me you must map out your ENTIRE run-out pattern before you get started. With regard to straight pool, it is best to map out the next 5 shots+.
buddha162 said:Me!
Yang has been a bitter dissapointment to me in not getting the job done. I was a fan since he won the Japan Open at 17, but since then? Nada...
His game, when he could find it, is perfect.
-Roger
titlistsucker said:Incidentally i dont seem to see any taiwanese being invited to IPT?
9balldiva said:When did Archer FALL OFF!!?? !
Mr. Wilson said:I'd love to buy into that.......but like they say, "if it sounds too good to be true......"
Cornerman said:I've met a few people that had run over 300 balls that never played in any tour. I don't know about today, but 20 years ago, certainly possible.
Edit: I've spent a few hours on the phone with Gene Nagy, a 400+ ball runner that I don't think ever played in any kind of tour.
Fred
This is such bullshit.9balldiva said:...my high run is probably somehwhere around 80-100, and that's because I was super determined to prove a man wrong when he said i couldn't pass 50!!
Don't doubt that there are many people out there who can run 400, but never got into to pro circuit.
buddha162 said:Me!
Yang has been a bitter dissapointment to me in not getting the job done. I was a fan since he won the Japan Open at 17, but since then? Nada...
His game, when he could find it, is perfect.
-Roger