How about this, IPT conflicts with WPC, World 8ball and Mosconi cup in 2006

All three of these events in 2006 conflict with already scheduled events of the IPT. I can guarantee that if these other tournaments don't change their dates, no one from the IPt will attend. Remeber that the ipt is paying players guaranteed money. As much as 5k, i think, for reno. Every player on the ipt will play in EVERY event, if for no other reason than to either try to requalify for 2007, or capture the big payday for as long as the ipt is still operating.
 
welcome to the business world. big fish eat small fish. there's going to be more conflicts to come. let's wait and see.
 
Here's a cut and paste from another thread about my thoughts on this:

I'm very happy for the players that they will be earning some great cash, however, if Trudeau manages to kill the WPC and the International (Not to mention the DCC and the US Open)Challenge of Champions:

Fa-uck Trudeau !
Fa-uck the IPT!
Fa-uck Trudeau's $50 DVD's!
Fa-uck Pool period!

I will not be part of KT's pool power trip!!!Pool is much bigger than Kevin Trudeau!I'm not going to support some ego maniac who claims to have said:"I'm going to own pool."

If on the other hand the IPT wants to co-exist without killing those other great events, I say:

Put Kevin Trudeau in the hall of fame!

JMO,
RJ
 
NYC cue dude said:
All three of these events in 2006 conflict with already scheduled events of the IPT. I can guarantee that if these other tournaments don't change their dates, no one from the IPt will attend. Remeber that the ipt is paying players guaranteed money. As much as 5k, i think, for reno. Every player on the ipt will play in EVERY event, if for no other reason than to either try to requalify for 2007, or capture the big payday for as long as the ipt is still operating.

There only seems to be one conflict, Mosconi Cup.

Since only the top 42 and the 101-150 dropouts will be in contention at the IPT event, there should be plenty of talent pool available for the Mosconi Cup. It would be nice to see some new blood.

WPA (http://www.wpa-pool.com/index.asp?content=cal2005)

11/4/2006 - 11/12/2006
World 9-Ball Championships
Manila, Phillipines

12/16/2006 - 12/19/2006
Mosconi Cup

2/8/2007 - 2/15/2007
World 8-Ball Championships
Fujairah, United Arab Emirates

IPT (http://www.internationalpooltour.com/ipt_content/event_schedule/default.asp)

9/2/2006 - 9/10/2006
World 8-Ball Championships
Reno, Nv

10/22/2006 - 10/29/2006
IPT Players 8-Ball Championship
United Kingdom

11/26/2006 - 12/3/2006
IPT Masters 8-Ball Championship
Chicago, Il

12/12/2006 - 12/17/2006
IPT "King of the Hill" Invitational 8-Ball Shootout and Tour Card Qualifier
Las Vegas, Ca
 
Just remember that a rising tide floats all boats...the IPT can only improve pools situation. So far everything has been first class. These other events will only get better just because of the competition for players and more money. Too bad I only have one oar in the water....LOL
 
Looks like the IPT only overlaps one day of the Mosconi Cup, which would only affect 4 people...the last 2 in the KOH and the last 2 in the Q. I don't know how far they would have to travel to get to the Mosconi Cup, but it could be doable for those that wanted to get both in.
 
This is my post in the other thread WPC vs. IPT:

Yup, this is all very disturbing. I don't know if Efren and the rest of the filipino pool players sponsored by Puyat will renege on their commitment to play in the Asian 9ball tour if the schedules overlap with the IPT, considering that it is sponsored by San Miguel Beer.

SMB, as some of the filipinos here will tell you, is an institution in the Philippines and cutting off ties with the company would be like screwing with your best friend's wife. That's the kind of backlash you'd get. Filipinos have an almost emotional attachment with San Miguel Beer (which is one reason why foreign brands like Heineken, Miller, and Budweiser have never really caught on in the Philippines. Another reason is it just plain tastes good!).

So we'll see if KT will gamble loyalty vs. money when the time comes. The filipinos are a big draw in any tournament, and if they would leave en masse then the credibility of any "international" tournament would be in doubt.

Of course, he could still get a few filipinos who aren't from the puyat stable, like maybe parica (who himself was once a SMB endorser), sambajon, and the others from the Mariano stable like Orcullo, Manalo, and Valle (not really sure about these), but things would really be different without Efren, Bustamante, and Pagulayan (?).

It would do KT, the IPT and pool in general, good if he could just somehow get together with the organizers of these other tournaments and come up with a consensus on who gets what dates and adjust their schedules accordingly. Like 2 weeks of every month beginning January is reserved for the DCC, February for the BCA Open, March for the US Open, April for an IPT event, May for the World Pool League, June for the World Pool Masters, July for another IPT event, August for the Challenge of Champions, September for the Mosconi Cup, December for the IPT King of the Hill, etc. etc. The other tours can then work their way around this schedule, like the Asian 9-ball can take the last week of every month from March to July. The European tour can overlap with the Asian tour because they're mutually exclusive (as of now). Straight pool, 1 pocket, 9ball tournaments can take the first weeks of the month, etc. etc.

Isn't this kinda like how the golf and tennis tournaments work things out?

Whatever happens, things are definitely looking up for pool and like it or not, KT now has a major say on how things will look like in the future. He can either steamroll the other tournaments into submission or work together with them for the betterment of pool. Let's hope he does the right thing....


"Can't we all just f***ing get along??!" -- from an ancient Chinese proverb
"Do no evil." -- Google co-founder sergei brin
 
HA!

Welcome to free market economics. Something few people understand.

Who cares about the other events - IF the IPT is financially stable, and is going to be around, all the money and excitement will be there.

In my opinion, the other events are so been-there-done-that. The IPT will only get more interesting as the money list and rankings begin to become and issue and people fight tooth and nail to keep their tour card.

Now, as for the other events. I don't want to see them fail, but I don't care if they can't survive either. In other words, if there is a demand - there will be a supply. I doubt that everyone in the world and here is going to be happy with 8-ball on carpet cloth round robins. The other events will survive so long as there's an interest to see them. Will pool fans all of a sudden not like to watch 9-ball anymore? I doubt that.


As for the players....some of you folks are making statements as if the IPT is to blame for being the force behind taking away all the players from these events. Guess what? The IPT forces absolutely no one from playing in these events (unless KT makes membership exclusive someday *more on that below). The one's who will make the decisions on where to play will be the players. Their decision will clearly be made by their desire to make more money by playing on the IPT and their NEED to play as many events as possible to retain their tour cards. All of which are their choices alone.


What's wrong with that? Don't blame KT or the IPT. Blame the players for being "sell outs"...that's all you can really do, and doing that is just absurd.



Now, I don't think IPT membership will become exclusive anytime soon. The entire basis behind making membership exclusive would be the potential successful branding of players. That requires that they become somewhat popular or kind of celebrities in some type of media, mostly TV. If the IPT spent all that money and time, as well as was the main vehicle for getting their faces out and making them characters/stars or whatever, they have a legitimate claim to the player's popularity. That player will draw viewers, fans, attention, which then brings in advertisement dollars etc..why should some other event or promoter or organization profit from the celebrity status of a player that the IPT made?


It is exactly the same reason record labels sign new artists to LONG contracts. You owe that label x amount of albums or singles before you can go your own. Why? Because they will spend millions of dollars getting your face everywhere, getting your music out, and promoting you. They want a return on their invenstment and then some.



Will this happen to pool players? I seriously doubt it. So I don't see KT's brainstorming of exclusive membership in the IPT ever becoming a reality.



That will always leave the choice of where to play and what to play up to the players. Which brings us back to the free market. The players will go where the money is at - end of story. Don't like it? Tough. The players aren't your personal entertainers or slaves to do as you please. If you can't stand the fact that the top talent won't play in other events because of the IPT -- vote with your wallet and remote control and boycott the IPT.


It's a free country.
 
NYC cue dude said:
........ Every player on the ipt will play in EVERY event, if for no other reason than to either try to requalify for 2007, or capture the big payday for as long as the ipt is still operating.

NYC cue dude,since you've brought the above subject into the discussion,would have to say that it seems to be at least a slight exaggeration:D

Have you forgottenthat several IPT members already withdrew from the first event? There will almost certainly be further withdrawals of IPT members from the Reno event and from the following two events.For example there is no way that all the snooker player IPT members are going to play all 4 events.Alternates......stand by for action;)
 
cheesemouse said:
Just remember that a rising tide floats all boats...the IPT can only improve pools situation. So far everything has been first class. These other events will only get better just because of the competition for players and more money. Too bad I only have one oar in the water....LOL

Tell that to all the people who have been put out of business by Walmart and Microsoft.
 
Bola Ocho said:
HA!

Welcome to free market economics. Something few people understand.

Who cares about the other events - IF the IPT is financially stable, and is going to be around, all the money and excitement will be there.

In my opinion, the other events are so been-there-done-that. The IPT will only get more interesting as the money list and rankings begin to become and issue and people fight tooth and nail to keep their tour card.

Now, as for the other events. I don't want to see them fail, but I don't care if they can't survive either. In other words, if there is a demand - there will be a supply. I doubt that everyone in the world and here is going to be happy with 8-ball on carpet cloth round robins. The other events will survive so long as there's an interest to see them. Will pool fans all of a sudden not like to watch 9-ball anymore? I doubt that.


As for the players....some of you folks are making statements as if the IPT is to blame for being the force behind taking away all the players from these events. Guess what? The IPT forces absolutely no one from playing in these events (unless KT makes membership exclusive someday *more on that below). The one's who will make the decisions on where to play will be the players. Their decision will clearly be made by their desire to make more money by playing on the IPT and their NEED to play as many events as possible to retain their tour cards. All of which are their choices alone.


What's wrong with that? Don't blame KT or the IPT. Blame the players for being "sell outs"...that's all you can really do, and doing that is just absurd.



Now, I don't think IPT membership will become exclusive anytime soon. The entire basis behind making membership exclusive would be the potential successful branding of players. That requires that they become somewhat popular or kind of celebrities in some type of media, mostly TV. If the IPT spent all that money and time, as well as was the main vehicle for getting their faces out and making them characters/stars or whatever, they have a legitimate claim to the player's popularity. That player will draw viewers, fans, attention, which then brings in advertisement dollars etc..why should some other event or promoter or organization profit from the celebrity status of a player that the IPT made?


It is exactly the same reason record labels sign new artists to LONG contracts. You owe that label x amount of albums or singles before you can go your own. Why? Because they will spend millions of dollars getting your face everywhere, getting your music out, and promoting you. They want a return on their invenstment and then some.



Will this happen to pool players? I seriously doubt it. So I don't see KT's brainstorming of exclusive membership in the IPT ever becoming a reality.



That will always leave the choice of where to play and what to play up to the players. Which brings us back to the free market. The players will go where the money is at - end of story. Don't like it? Tough. The players aren't your personal entertainers or slaves to do as you please. If you can't stand the fact that the top talent won't play in other events because of the IPT -- vote with your wallet and remote control and boycott the IPT.


It's a free country.

In the same vein as no man is an island, no country in the world is exclusively a free-market economy. Not the USA, not Dubai, not Hong Kong, and not Singapore. Why? Because as attractive as a laissez-faire economy sounds, it just does not work that way in the real world. why? because people tend to be greedy and corrupt. and there is no one greedier and more corrupt than the person with absolute power.

if the department of justice did not say that AT&T was a monopoly and broke them up into baby bells, we'd still be paying for long-distance calls through our noses. if microsoft wasn't stopped, we'd never get firefox or opera to work on windows.

The OPEC controls majority of the world's supply of oil. Their decisions could make or break entire countries reliant on oil. Which mean practically every country in the world. Remember the oil crisis in the seventies? or even the oil crisis we're facing now. Everyone feels it. In a free market, we can say, hell, F**K the OPEC! I'll buy my gas elsewhere. Uh, where?

So what to do? Well, middle-east countries can't produce everthing on their own. They have to get their cars, fresh produce, microchips, lumber, vodka, butter, or missiles somewhere else. Get the picture?

Sure, they have all the money in the world, they can BUY these stuff! Not if you're driven by something else other than greed. The UN and the G7 nations can impose sanctions, put up trade barriers. Why? To protect the smaller countries who have no bargaining chips. That's what they're there for.

I only wish the best for the IPT, KT, and pool in general. However, someone who declares that he wants to "own pool" should not be taken lightly. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. If and when the IPT becomes the only game in town, who's to stop KT from imposing his will on everyone?

A little regulation never hurt anyone. It's meant to keep everyone honest. If we left everything to the free market, chaos would ensue. Remember, free markets only work in a perfect world. Something we're still a long way off.
 
Bola Ocho said:
HA!

Now, I don't think IPT membership will become exclusive anytime soon. The entire basis behind making membership exclusive would be the potential successful branding of players. That requires that they become somewhat popular or kind of celebrities in some type of media, mostly TV. If the IPT spent all that money and time, as well as was the main vehicle for getting their faces out and making them characters/stars or whatever, they have a legitimate claim to the player's popularity. That player will draw viewers, fans, attention, which then brings in advertisement dollars etc..why should some other event or promoter or organization profit from the celebrity status of a player that the IPT made?

KT and the IPT seem to be very successful with their brainwashing campaign to convince the players that HE will turn THEM into celebtities. The IPT has taken all of the ALREADY established, well known, current pool players: Efren, Earl, Allison, etc. plus the legend Hall of Famers: Massey, Varner. etc., to brand, and create the IPT, not the other way around. These players were already well known celebrities before KT and the IPT came along, the IPT was taken seriously and was able to get off the ground because of THEM. Yes, he upped the stakes, and that's great, but they were already familiar, popular faces on TV and in the pool world. This phoney explaination for requiring their IPT exclusivity is just an attempt to justify his plans to control pool and destroy the other major tours by excercising total control over all the players. Because of the amount of money already invested, the real truth is that he now needs the players more than they need him. And they should know and act as though they know it.
 
Renegade said:
In the same vein as no man is an island, no country in the world is exclusively a free-market economy. Not the USA, not Dubai, not Hong Kong, and not Singapore. Why? Because as attractive as a laissez-faire economy sounds, it just does not work that way in the real world. why? because people tend to be greedy and corrupt. and there is no one greedier and more corrupt than the person with absolute power.

if the department of justice did not say that AT&T was a monopoly and broke them up into baby bells, we'd still be paying for long-distance calls through our noses. if microsoft wasn't stopped, we'd never get firefox or opera to work on windows.


I don't really want to get into a political or economical discussion, but monopolies are created by protectionism (government, or government corruption). People have it all wrong when the they think government is the great savior that busts up monopolies on our behalf. Without government, these large companies would not be able to squash competitors. Government was established to protect the people, but that's not the case anymore (if it ever were). If there's anyone to blame - it's the government. We know people are greedy, and we know the government is made up of people - however, we put them in power to do a specific job and they don't. Corporations don't have a social-contract (like a constitution) with us for any specific goal. In light of that, government, on behalf of the greedy bast4rds, prevents free market economics which always benefit the end user. Look at our pharmaceuticals! Why do the Canadians have drugs we cannot get? Why do we have to pay monthly fees for PVRs(tivos)..when the Japanese (a couple of years ago) were ready to ship a PVR unit that does not require subscription.. Why do we have to get raped? Because greedy bast4ards pay the corrupt bast4rds in the government. Without the thugs in DC, these corporate whorez would be powerless. So I blame the government more.


[back to pool talk which is so much better.....]


jimmyg said:
KT and the IPT seem to be very successful with their brainwashing campaign to convince the players that HE will turn THEM into celebtities. The IPT has taken all of the ALREADY established, well known, current pool players: Efren, Earl, Allison, etc. plus the legend Hall of Famers: Massey, Varner. etc., to brand, and create the IPT, not the other way around. These players were already well known celebrities before KT and the IPT came along, the IPT was taken seriously and was able to get off the ground because of THEM. Yes, he upped the stakes, and that's great, but they were already familiar, popular faces on TV and in the pool world.



EXCELLENT point. Very true words and I agree for the most part. I think that KT is referring to how the players will become celebrities in the context of his vision for pool. IE, how he will attract new fans to pool. His model is similar to Poker. A lot of people watch Poker on TV for the characters and faces. Almost becomes like a soap opera.

Now, I'm not saying that's going to happen. I think it won't. KT's idea is to fish in a new pond for views and fans - because in his view, the current pool fans aren't enough to make pool big, and I if I could add some conjecture here, might not be the right kind of fans he's looking for.


Sure Busta, Allison, Reyes, and all of them are already stars to US, but they are not stars to Mr. Average Joe American who might become a new pool watching fan after flipping to OLN one day....
 
Bola Ocho said:
Now, I don't think IPT membership will become exclusive anytime soon. The entire basis behind making membership exclusive would be the potential successful branding of players. That requires that they become somewhat popular or kind of celebrities in some type of media, mostly TV. If the IPT spent all that money and time, as well as was the main vehicle for getting their faces out and making them characters/stars or whatever, they have a legitimate claim to the player's popularity. That player will draw viewers, fans, attention, which then brings in advertisement dollars etc..why should some other event or promoter or organization profit from the celebrity status of a player that the IPT made?

It is exactly the same reason record labels sign new artists to LONG contracts. You owe that label x amount of albums or singles before you can go your own. Why? Because they will spend millions of dollars getting your face everywhere, getting your music out, and promoting you. They want a return on their invenstment and then some.

Will this happen to pool players? I seriously doubt it. So I don't see KT's brainstorming of exclusive membership in the IPT ever becoming a reality.


Now about this other point, I noticed you made several good points for why KT should/could require exclusive contracts from the IPT players. And then, you turn around and say that you don't think this will happen. You said you "seriously doubt it". So you don't see this ever becoming a reality. but, you didn't say the reason why. (?)

Well, I could tell you a reason why KT shouldn't even consider holding the players to an exclusivity contract. It's happened before. History would show why holding people to exclusivity contracts is counter productive to the industry as a whole and just isn't right. I'm talking about Hollywood and the whole entertainment industry.

Decades ago, movie stars were the exclusive property of the studios that made them famous. According to them, they had a ligitimate claim to the actors' popularity. Why should other studios profit from the celebrity status of an actor that the studio made? They naturally want a return on their investment and then some. So what happened?

Movie stars became unhappy, they wanted out, but their studio didn't let them, so they started acting crappily, whether in front of cameras or not. Pretty soon, the studios were just all too happy to let them go. I know this explanation is a bit protracted but basically that's what it boils down to.

Maybe KT could keep all the IPT players happy since he pays top dollar. But what happens when someone else comes along offering better payouts, better terms? Or what if, just what if, on the slim chance, some of the players are not really motivated by the money??? that they value their health more, or their families, or their loyalty to their country?

NOw, I'm not trying to pick fights with anyone. All this is just pure speculation. We're really not sure whether KT would impose exclusivity contracts on the IPT players. Here's hoping he does not.
 
Last edited:
jimmyg said:
KT and the IPT seem to be very successful with their brainwashing campaign to convince the players that HE will turn THEM into celebtities. The IPT has taken all of the ALREADY established, well known, current pool players: Efren, Earl, Allison, etc. plus the legend Hall of Famers: Massey, Varner. etc., to brand, and create the IPT, not the other way around. These players were already well known celebrities before KT and the IPT came along, the IPT was taken seriously and was able to get off the ground because of THEM. Yes, he upped the stakes, and that's great, but they were already familiar, popular faces on TV and in the pool world. This phoney explaination for requiring their IPT exclusivity is just an attempt to justify his plans to control pool and destroy the other major tours by excercising total control over all the players. Because of the amount of money already invested, the real truth is that he now needs the players more than they need him. And they should know and act as though they know it.
my sentiments exactly:)
 
I'm confused.

I don't think KT will be able to successfully brand the players in the IPT to the point where he'll feel that he owns a part of their celebrity. I wasn't siding with KT's thinking, just elaborating on his statements and potential justifications/motives from a speculative standpoint.


That's what I was getting at. Good point on the movie actors comparison. I agree on that.

My personal opinion is:
I think making the IPT exclusive would be bad. But I don't think pool or the market for pool will ever allow that decision or move to even get on the table for consideration in the first place. That's kind of my prediction or foresight on the potential success of the IPT.


The only way, like I said, is if the IPT became absolutely huge and had zero competition (no one else to form a tour or league). I don't think the IPT will reach that kind of exposure or dominance. I think it can be successful, but not that much. Here's another thing that would make that condition impossible. If he catapults pool to that level of popularity and success -- he will encounter competitors. He'll prove to others who have money and never considered pool to be profitable that it can be, and they'll copy his model or build upon it -- therefore, making exclusivity almost impossible. That's the free market at work again. Sure, you guys can sweat a potential KT dictatorship over of pool, but the same way he has the right to start a tour, so does anyone else. And there's other rich people and corporations that are bigger than KT. They'll treat him the same way, saying that there's no such thing as "the governing body of pool"....
 
Bola Ocho said:
I'm confused.

I don't think KT will be able to successfully brand the players in the IPT to the point where he'll feel that he owns a part of their celebrity. I wasn't siding with KT's thinking, just elaborating on his statements and potential justifications/motives from a speculative standpoint.


That's what I was getting at. Good point on the movie actors comparison. I agree on that.

My personal opinion is:
I think making the IPT exclusive would be bad. But I don't think pool or the market for pool will ever allow that decision or move to even get on the table for consideration in the first place. That's kind of my prediction or foresight on the potential success of the IPT.


The only way, like I said, is if the IPT became absolutely huge and had zero competition (no one else to form a tour or league). I don't think the IPT will reach that kind of exposure or dominance. I think it can be successful, but not that much. Here's another thing that would make that condition impossible. If he catapults pool to that level of popularity and success -- he will encounter competitors. He'll prove to others who have money and never considered pool to be profitable that it can be, and they'll copy his model or build upon it -- therefore, making exclusivity almost impossible. That's the free market at work again. Sure, you guys can sweat a potential KT dictatorship over of pool, but the same way he has the right to start a tour, so does anyone else. And there's other rich people and corporations that are bigger than KT. They'll treat him the same way, saying that there's no such thing as "the governing body of pool"....

Good! We agree then! :)

I think KT realizes this. Definitely, money is not THE barrier to entry to starting a tour like the IPT. That's why he might be seriously considering putting them on exclusivity contract. That way, he has all the top players working for him. But as I've already said, hopefully he won't go down this path as it's bound to self-destruct.
 
Do all top players need to play in all tournaments? Or they prefer to play where they like? ATP tour overlaps over and over but you don't hear players complain. Federer don't play in every tournaments. Let them play wherever they please. If San Miguel overlaps with Euro tour overlaps with WPC with Mosconi Cup with US open etc, then it overlaps. What can we do about it. Maybe all of them should talk together and create 4 Major tournament where all top pro should attend, lets say, US 9 Ball Open, WPC World 9 Ball Open, IPT World 8 Ball Open and WPA World 8 Ball Open. Like Grand Slam of tennis or The Majors in Golf. The rest will be like semi major or minor tours. Others will be exhibition matches like Mosconi or Invitationals. They should all talk and work something out or everything will be a disaster.
 
parvus1202 said:
Do all top players need to play in all tournaments? Or they prefer to play where they like? ATP tour overlaps over and over but you don't hear players complain. Federer don't play in every tournaments. Let them play wherever they please. If San Miguel overlaps with Euro tour overlaps with WPC with Mosconi Cup with US open etc, then it overlaps. What can we do about it. Maybe all of them should talk together and create 4 Major tournament where all top pro should attend, lets say, US 9 Ball Open, WPC World 9 Ball Open, IPT World 8 Ball Open and WPA World 8 Ball Open. Like Grand Slam of tennis or The Majors in Golf. The rest will be like semi major or minor tours. Others will be exhibition matches like Mosconi or Invitationals. They should all talk and work something out or everything will be a disaster.

Correct! But someone mentioned that KT requires (or would require) his players to play all his tournaments or else lose their tour card. And it's been bandied about that he's considering (not yet sure) putting them on an exclusivity contract that would prevent them from playing other tournaments. Like I said in my previous post,

"It would do KT, the IPT and pool in general, good if he could just somehow get together with the organizers of these other tournaments and come up with a consensus on who gets what dates and adjust their schedules accordingly. Like 2 weeks of every month beginning January is reserved for the DCC, February for the BCA Open, March for the US Open, April for an IPT event, May for the World Pool League, June for the World Pool Masters, July for another IPT event, August for the Challenge of Champions, September for the Mosconi Cup, December for the IPT King of the Hill, etc. etc. The other tours can then work their way around this schedule, like the Asian 9-ball can take the last week of every month from March to July. The European tour can overlap with the Asian tour because they're mutually exclusive (as of now). Straight pool, 1 pocket, 9ball tournaments can take the first weeks of the month, etc. etc.

Isn't this kinda like how the golf and tennis tournaments work things out?

Whatever happens, things are definitely looking up for pool and like it or not, KT now has a major say on how things will look like in the future. He can either steamroll the other tournaments into submission or work together with them for the betterment of pool. Let's hope he does the right thing...."

Putting players on exclusivity contracts would not be a good idea!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top