I'm with you on this.Maybe its my erratic shape play but I've had to doIt's not a kick, it's not a double kiss, it's just a straight shot to the corner. It's a good shot, but not anything amazing. It's an open shot to that pocket. I guess I just don't understand all the amazement about it.![]()
It's not a kick, it's not a double kiss, it's just a straight shot to the corner. It's a good shot, but not anything amazing. It's an open shot to that pocket. I guess I just don't understand all the amazement about it.![]()
It's not that amazing...but what's amazing is where the cueball ended up...cutting it that thin, the cueball had so much forward direction and momentum, I can't see how you'd draw it back enough like that without having double-kissed the object ball after the rail...???
It seems like whenever you shoot that shot, you're always worried about the scratch into the same corner...which is the reason for the draw.
It's not that amazing...but what's amazing is where the cueball ended up...cutting it that thin, the cueball had so much forward direction and momentum, I can't see how you'd draw it back enough like that without having double-kissed the object ball after the rail...???
It seems like whenever you shoot that shot, you're always worried about the scratch into the same corner...which is the reason for the draw.
It's not a kick, it's not a double kiss, it's just a straight shot to the corner. It's a good shot, but not anything amazing. It's an open shot to that pocket. I guess I just don't understand all the amazement about it.![]()
Folks, look at the path of the CB. How can anyone say it was a straight cut shot by looking at where the CB went after impact with the OB?
I'm not sure if it was a kick shot or a double-kiss, but one thing is certain. The CB hit the OB after hitting the rail. So it was anything but a straight cut shot.