I wasn't even thinking about you so much when I made the post, I was thinking about all the other knockers of CTE. What if you had that many over the length of a decade or more? Wouldn't it at some point just get to the point of disgusting.
Best thing for you to do is stay totally out of comparisons personally. Let your own product do the talking and others for it. We try to do the talking for what we know works, and look what happens. WHY? It's DISGUSTIING with the attacks.
As far as comparisons go, I'm not going to make it between CTE and Poolology because there is none, especially as far as the entire process is applied to make balls.
But yours is very much like Joe Tucker's aiming system. The difference is between fractions to shoot at with yours vs. contact points with his. He was the first one to come up with a grid for all the possibilities of OB placement on the table and the CB placement on the table.
It can all be done without the grid by enough practice to learn it for yourself just to be able to see which number contact point on both balls should be used when shooting. Or it can be done by learning the ball placement on the grid.
That can be quite overwhelming to think it needs to be learned when first seen. If it is learned, the shot is almost automatically seen and known in a flash, but it is a biatch to put all of it into the memory bank. Same as yours.
Yes, a decade of defense would be exhausting. I only defend my book when a post is completely fabricated pertaining to the material in the book. A lie should be put straight. It is not a lie for someone to say, "I don't get it", or for someone to ask questions about certain aspects of the system. I try to respond to those posts in a professional manner, no need to disparage a user for asking legitimate questions when there are legitimate answers.