How the WPA is sabotaging the pool world

gotama

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I started a new blog today. It is a blog that talks about various subjects and issues of the world of pool billiard. There is no intention to discredit any players but some might be included in an example to show a certain deficit.

http://realpooltalk.blogspot.com/

The two first posts are the article I wrote a few weeks ago, the "amateur tour issue", and the newest about the WPA and its leader, Ian Anderson.


Best Regards


Marco Tschudi



WHERE IT SMELLS FUNNY

Early Stages

For this article I want to start a few years ago, in the 90's when I started to play pool to be precise. In 1996 I attended the Youth European Championships for the first time although I wasn't really on the level to really compete yet. I did (mostly) what I was told by my coach and my national federation. Growing as a junior player I had more to do with the federation and its elected principals. It didn't take long to realize that not everything is in order. I was definitely not happy with the situation back then and was even part of a committee that tried to dispossess the national governing body of pool billiard. But I thought by myself: this is Switzerland. Once I am a pro I won't have to deal with stuff like that anymore.
In 2004 I started to play for a German team in the 3rd division of the German League system. Germany is well known in the pool world, not only for its World Champions but also for the huge amount high-level players, especially in straight pool. In fact this was always a dream of mine since I read about the league in pool magazines. And guess what, I even teamed up with one of these World Champions! We had a fun season, raising in the 2nd division without a doubt. Everything seemed to be just fine. But then, one year later, unbeaten in the 2nd division we had to play the play-offs to get into the premier division. And that's exactly when the fun part started to collapse. Yet again the federation decided to change rules for just unreal reasons. And this never ended. While we still won that play-off and finished in the top3 every year of the premier league after that, winning it in 2009, the German federation never seemed shy of unreal, unnecessary and stupid solutions, officially intending to do good for the sport.
At the same time I was playing several European Championships. And what shall I say?! Also the European federation is not above reproach. Many things, in my and also other players' point of view went wrong and a lot of, in my understanding, natural goals were not reached. My biggest disappointment for example was what I gained from finishing 2nd in the EC 9-ball in 2006: a spot at the BCA Open in Las Vegas. To mention, I had to pay the flight, hotel and the 500$ entry fee myself! That is what you get as “first loser”.
All of these federations know about my opinion because I was never shy to say it. And all this time I thought: once I am a pro all this won't bother me anymore because I won't have to deal with it beyond a certain point. I was wrong!

World stage and World Championships

My first appearance at a World Championship was in Taiwan in 2004. The event was managed and run by Matchroom Sport since 1999 when they herald the new-age of pool events in Cardiff, Wales. Besides my performance the event was a total success! Players knew the deal, promotional clips were already running in the national and continental TV when we arrived at the hotel and the queue in front of the WTC convention hall was about 200 people strong. And also important – I felt like a pro!
But this all changed, starting in the very same year 2004. The World 8-ball Championships were given to Fujairah, a city just 90 minutes away from Dubai. Lots of people/players thought that this was promising considering the latest upraising of the emirates. Although the total purse was way too small for such an event most international top players made their way to the desert. I also took part in the 2005 event. And this time it was the other way around. Besides my performance, everything else was ridiculous. We played in a tent somewhere in the back of the hotels, off of everything, with referees that didn't know anything about pool, a time management that made me playing 5 hours late to play for a seat in the elimination round at 3.30am and even an official WC banner over an entrance telling us that we are still in 2004.
I was not only shocked but also sure that this won't happen again because the head of our sport, WPA president Ian Anderson was on location. He must have seen what I had seen and take his consequences out of this experience. But I was wrong again! Since 2004 the WC 8-ball have been given to Fujairah again in 2007, 2008, 2010 as well as 2011. Did it improve? I can't tell because I was never willing to go there again. But the latest blog of former 9-ball World Champion Daryl Peach tells you this:

World 8ball Championships
"Well, could you really call this tournament that? To be honest, it's one of the worst events I have played in for a long time! I hate to say that because the UAE people are great and I wish the tournament was a big success, but in truth, the organisation was well below par, and the format was terrible. The referees were terrible apart from the odd one, and to be honest ALL the players said the same.
I had what was probably the toughest group, every player in the group was capable of beating the others in the group. But I played some solid stuff and came through on the winners side by beating firstly Joven Bustamante and then Francisco Bustamante, both by a score line of 7-6.
Because of the strange format that they decided to use, there were 56 qualifiers for the straight KO stage, but they decided to give 8 byes to the 8players who had lost the least racks in the group stages....all this meant was that the players who had easy groups got rewarded for it, and players who had tough groups like myself were penalised because it was so hard to win heavily against world class players!
So I drew Vilmos Foldes in the last 56 and had 4 dry breaks from my first 4breaks! I was 7-1 down and got it back to 7-5, but made the mistake of asking the ref to remove the breaking template (magic rack)....he mark the 2 balls that were near the rack but then proceeded to drop one and moved the marker on the other! This messed the whole layout up of the balls. This eventually hindered me in running the balls out and I lost the rack, and eventually lost 9-6.

To be honest, the only reason I was disappointed in losing was because this event carried Mosconi cup points. I was glad to get outta there and get home, and now I look forward to my next event......” - by Daryl Peach (source: http://darylpeachpool.blogspot.com )
And if you ask yourself now if “our” president was on location or not – pictures tell you more than words:

picture only available in the blog

Ian Anderson (white shirt) filling out the draw (with a pen!) on a Championship pool table, placing his drink just next to him, also ON the pool table

Also to mention is the amount of wild cards and local qualifiers for this year's WC 8-ball:


  • 9 organizer wildcards (of which at least 3 are doubtful choices due to no possible serious reasoning)
    6 UAE players
    3 wildcards
    9 qualifiers

That means that 27 of the 112 players are either wildcards or qualifiers. I think there are more than enough players around the world that would have earned their spot more than many of these 27 players! I assumption is that there was "a deal" made or the organizer just was authorized to do want he wants.
Another funny fact is the system they used this year. Daryl describes already most of it. Which promoter would do a tournament with 14! groups?
In 2008 the WPA decided to give the World 10-Ball Championships to Raya Sports of the Philippines, run by Yen Makabenta. Matchroom Sport was kept outside. And it was a disaster! The main squad of Philippine players boycotted the event due to a reigning fight between the Federation, run by Yen Makabenta, and the other stall which promotes the players such as Reyes, Bustamante, Gomez, Orcullo etc.. Spectators didn't arrive, I never received an informational email about the opening ceremony or the opening dinner. Just by accident me and my room mate found out about these happenings just 30 minutes after the first and 30 minutes before the second event. The referees were not trained well! During two of my friends' matches the referee called a foul although everything was 100% okay. During one of my games I had to ask the referee to switch off his cell phone three times in a 3 minutes interval after it didn't stop ringing. Only when I got a little offensive he finally agreed to turn it off. Additionally, players had to wait for their prize money somewhere between 3 and 11 months! You might think now that Ian Anderson and the WPA would not sanction the event again if organized by Raya Sports in the following year?! Wrong! Same old same old in the following year and even worse!
In 2009 the Qatar Snooker and Billiards Federation organized the Qatar Open for the first time. All players were looking forward to a new event, held by an ambitious federation. The hotel was nice, the venue was convenient and the people very nice and courteous. The only mistakes they did is the choice of tournament directors. Their biggest mistake was the draw! You would think that the head of our sport would know how to do a draw but again – wrong! While I played and lost against Darren Appleton, Marcus Chamat beat Yi-Ko Pin. So Yi-Ko Pin and me both won the following match in the loser round and then... guess what: we played the same players again. Darren and Marcus....

>>> go to the blog to finish: http://realpooltalk.blogspot.com/
 
amazing marco!! you are 100% right and with your post you`va brought a little smile at my sad face...
ecspecially from my point of view the funniest thing is that the b-c class players (as we are) are not able to play all the ranking events, even if we are qualified for all of them, because without a semifinal + finish the season would cost at least 10k-15k€ (prizemoney already calculated!!!) i dont think any other sportsman which is a regular and solid player of rankingevents in any other sport will make a huge MINUS in his calculation in the end of a season, right? but a poolplayer does...
for example: since almost 5 years im a regular player at the euro tour and i think that i was in the top 32 of the overall ranking for around 90% of the time, but my calculation tells me that it costet (!!!!) me around 10k€ so far... nice... ;-)
i also played a few world ranking events and world championships and guys, i really can tell you: its sooooo much fun when you fly around the world for 2 weeks and you know if you are running like expectet or even a few rounds better, then you are even!!! (the bad thing is that the bills at home are not taking a time out. they still wanna be paied!!!

i want the best players to have the nicest life in the world, cause they deserved!!!! but i would also love to see pool as a sport, where a solid player at world stage doesnt have to work fulltime to pay his bills!!

we need a change and i also tried many times to get in touch with players to make a change, but i think that you are doing it the best possible way and that i will support you with everything i can!!!
 
Thank you, Marco, for sharing your very well-written blog. It is one of the features of this forum here at AzBilliards that is great when we are able to communicate with those around the world.

Speaking as an American railbird, it is interesting to learn how professional pool is viewed on a global scale.

I especially enjoyed reading Peach's remarks as well. Both you and he help to shed light on the current state of affairs.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts! :)
 
Hi y'all

I have already received a few emails. Thank you very much for your opinions! Now we also need some people here in the forum to post their thoughts and opinions.
The AZBforum is maybe the pool forum with the biggest overall knowledge about our sport. So I ask all you guys to participate in this thing here.
I kindly ask everybody not to write something to just talk bad about the WPA or any other organisation/person in this thread. But if you have something constructive to say you are more than welcome. I really think that something has to be done pretty soon so we can enjoy our game also in the future. Please be part of it, even if only as a supporter.

Best Wishes

Marco Tschudi
 
Marco, good luck with your blog! I'm too very concerned about current condition of pool and where it is driven by the WPA. My view, since Matchroom is away from running world championships the title lost pretty much weight. Yes, Far East might bring money, but a world championship without decent internet coverage, site, score updates, interviews? Let alone live TV shows or at least records...
 
Marco, enjoyed your view from a players perspective, it all rings with such a familiar tone paralleling the pool scene flow the last 40 yrs here in the states (not all venues). People on the non playing side willing to support our game have no vision/idea/clue of how things are, should or can be and then they probably get one players help figuring out how to do it. It's as if the attitude in many areas of the globe (nonplayers/businessmen) is "its just a game" and they can go ahead on a whim and put in this rule, or we'll try it this way. In essence it reminds me of bar room 8 ball rules, different in every bar and every players mind in every state and rules can and do change whom ever is holding the table at that particular time. Until someone with an idea that will chum the waters of our game from the bottom up and create needed funds to make change, pools still going to keep trying to create the sport from the top down. Welcome to to pool world, the industry took the fun out of the game decades ago by leaving it in the basement.
 
I was told that there is also an article by Mike Panozzo about the WPA. I read it immediately. What a nice coincident! Check it out what the owner of Billiards Digest has to say:

http://www.billiardsdigest.com/showblogentry.php?id=140

Thanks for the link Marco. Very interesting. Would be useful to know how the nomination and election process for board members in WPA works. Currently Europe have no board members - due to conflicts within the board. However, the board is not electing itself, is it?
 
Thanks for the link Marco. Very interesting. Would be useful to know how the nomination and election process for board members in WPA works. Currently Europe have no board members - due to conflicts within the board. However, the board is not electing itself, is it?

Just to update your information Europe are now represented on the WPA Board by Poland's Marcin Krzemiński and Euro Tour's David Morris.

For those who read Mike Panozzo's article, a correction. The field only consisted of 112 players and the entry fee was $200 not $250. With some exempt entries this produced around $20,000 (not $32,000).
 
I like how the people with money and power decide what is best for the sport. That story has inspirational elements if one wants to see the benefits of power and money on those that seek it and it shows and easily a replacement can be found when access to a chance to the prize money is limited. Still hoping to hear how the story ends, it doesn't seem like it peaked from the players point of view.
 
I was told that there is also an article by Mike Panozzo about the WPA. I read it immediately. What a nice coincident! Check it out what the owner of Billiards Digest has to say:

http://www.billiardsdigest.com/showblogentry.php?id=140

Now that man is, indeed, a writer. Wow! Well punctuated and excellent content flow. It is no wonder that Billiards Digest continues to be at the top of the heap of billiard magazines.

I don't always agree with Mike Panazzo's editorials, but he's right on the money with this one [pun intended].

I gotta give credit where credit is due. Bravo to Mike Panazzo and Billiards Digest for speaking the truth.

Now, if he can do something about that BCA industry-member organization, he would really be my hero. :grin-square:
 
Well Marco

I can see that you have put a lot of thought into your article and have some sincerely held views on the issues therein. From conversations that we have had in the past I am probably the last person that you would have expected to be defending the WPA.

Many times in the past I have been critical of them (and with just cause) but there are a few misconceptions surrounding matters that you present as facts.

Fujairah was not the greatest event that they have ever staged but there were extenuating circumstances. Last year the WPA brought their own tournament director and with his experience he did a pretty good job. This year in an effort to keep costs down they procured the services of WPA Board Member Jerry Forsyth as TD.

Jerry was already there wearing his AZB hat and was paid by the sponsors to act as Press Officer for the tournament. All that was needed was to give him a WPA hat to wear as well.

Now Jerry has been around the game a long time, has attended a great number of events and assumed that scheduling an event of this nature was something that he could probably do in his sleep.

But he got a wake up call when his flawed format threw up some problems that unfairly penalised some players.

With 112 players in the field some byes were inevitable but they should have been inserted at the start of the tournament not in the middle.

Obviously if you are in a tough group then it is virtually impossible to win without sacrificing racks. Daryl Peach had to concede 12 racks in Double Bustamante victories while Antonio Lining only dropped 2 racks in a much weaker group.

This determined your weaker/stronger opponent in the final knock out stages. It also gave the 8 seeded players a major advantage and a $1000 step up the prize ladder while the others had to play two matches to reach the final 32.

The other factor to take into account was the WINNER BREAKS format. A casual poll before the start would have found a majority in favour of this.

But after Raj Hundal confined Konstantin Stepanov to a losing lag shot and Mika Immonen finished off a match with a 7 pack and then ran the first 8 racks of his next game, the concensus shifted.

I like winner breaks but this was brutal. Perhaps the shooter should hand the break over when he reaches his target and his opponent has a chance to emulate his feat. In the unlikely event that he achieves this then they could play two ahead.

The other thing that should never be repeated was the public collection of entry fees. This was done by Ian Anderson and Jerry where a player paid his money and was then required to pull a piece of paper corresponding to a slot on the draw sheet. This paired him up with one of the prepositioned seeds. But many players were unaware that for the first time since 1999 there was an entry fee to be paid. The whole thing descended into an undignified farce. This was the first time that fee collection was an issue and I don't expect this collection process will be operated in this way again.



Finally, a simple typo error scheduled sixteen matches on to 8 tables for three of Mondays sessions.

It wasn't noticed until the practice room suddenly seemed over full and it was solved by moving second round matches to their rightful corresponding spots on Tuesday. Unfortunately with players scattered round the hotels of the town the WPA did not have enough manpower to inform eveyone of the change. With a result of players turning up for their matches 24 hours early.

Jerry had his hands full with his dual roles and in final desperation he cut back the races in the semi finals and finals But this was not an experience that he enjoyed and I cannot see him heading up the volunteers in the future.

Doug
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link Marco. Very interesting. Would be useful to know how the nomination and election process for board members in WPA works. Currently Europe have no board members - due to conflicts within the board. However, the board is not electing itself, is it?

how is it the same people (or is it just 1 man) stays in power this long? where and when are elections? who votes?
I dont think ive heard any good things about the WPA from anyone ,except maybe the people sanctioning with them and paying off sanction fees
 
I was told that there is also an article by Mike Panozzo about the WPA. I read it immediately. What a nice coincident! Check it out what the owner of Billiards Digest has to say:

http://www.billiardsdigest.com/showblogentry.php?id=140

Quoting Mr. Panozzo's article: "...the WPA needs to be more proactive in sharing its vision and, frankly, needs stronger leadership."

Sounds to me that the WPA actually HARMS pool. Observe what Elizabeth Warren (tapped to head the embattled newly formed consumer financial protection agency in the US) said regarding her newly formed organization:

paraphrased by financial columnist Jane Quinn Bryant: "Elizabeth Warren, who first proposed the idea of a consumer financial protection agency, has always said that she’d rather have no CFPB than have a weak one that couldn’t function. A “pretend” bureau would be the worst of all".

I think that Ms. Warren is right. I also think that a "pretend" WPA is worse than no WPA.
 
Back
Top