I agree with Darren
- Thread starter Fatboy
- Start date
You're a joke. I didn't say I had any dealings with Eric and I don't think I was judging him. You made a blanket statement that people get what they deserve. You have this idea that all is fair. If I can do it to you before you do it to me then all is right with the world. I will agree with you that there are ignorant (not stupid) people in this world and they sincerely do not have the knowledge to see beyond trying to get ahead in life. I am not talking about people becoming wealthy just being able to make payments with a little left over to do just a little more. No Lambos in their future but they may be able to stay out of nursing homes or send their kids to school.
You are right that most people on AZB only know what they've read about Eric and I am certainly one of them but what we've read isn't good.
You really wanna play this game ? Lemme tell ya somethin...
Hard working people, many under financial duress, gave their $150 with the understanding that they would be able to gain access to up to $2500, cash advance or credit. The company made a material representation and/or implication that the $150 would pay for access to the above $2500.
Some may have intended to use that for a new roof. Or a costly repair on their car. Or to pay medical expenses not covered by their healthcare provider. Or a variety or other incurred expenses to 'try and dig themselves out of the hole'.
What they received was significantly different from what they were promised. The $2,500 line of credit and the “credit card,” are limited to purchases of goods from the company's catalogues. The $2,500 cash advance is limited to an initial cash advance of $10. And they don't really receive a card, they only get a form to use to send for an application for a credit card.
It's deceit, no matter how you slice it.
And you are trying to defend and condone that type of deceit.
That tells me a lot about not only him, but you as well.
I didn't realize you were a moderator, telling me what I can and cannot post here.
And I've based my opinion about 'the person himself' after reading and hearing a great deal of things about him, here and other places.
Actions speak louder than words, no matter how much money you have...
Speaking of mods... where are they?
SHhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... they're sleeping!!!! :boring:
You seriously think that's why I suggested we need a mod? lmao.
They're trying to figure out how to compress a month's worth of downtime ("Downtime - 11-30-2011 until 12-31-2011") into 10 minutes:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/announcement.php?f=6
Talk about making time fly!
-Sean
I was thinking much the same thing.
Dennis would have been a much better choice, for sure.Dennis Hatch was up for running as being the captain of Team USA. With all of his spirit and ethusiasm that he displayed in the previous Mosconi Cups, it sure is a shame he was not selected as the captain. :sorry:
I guess Johnny, et al., chose Charlie because they wanted him to be a part of their Mosconi Cup experience. :grin-devilish:
As far as excitement goes, Dennis would have complemented the entire event. Everybody loves Dennis.
I think Johnny, et al., made the wrong selection. That's my opinion, and I'm sticking with it.
I agree, Varner was a great choice.
Still trying to figure out why young and business sense might win over age, wisdom and talent that has been earned on the table.
I always thought that in order to be a good coach or mentor, that your team
would look up to you in admiration, for your past achievements, talent and knowledge of the game.
This, I believe you could easily find in the likes of Nick, Buddy, Mike M, Jim R and yes even Earl. CW? No way. I doubt he could give any of the players a real run for the money. In their day, any of the names I mentioned could have done it. Even now it would be foolish to assume that any of them couldn't keep up to them because perhaps they are past their prime.
Earl could whack any of them hard on any given day.
Even a youngster like Dennis would be a far better choice. Hes animated and a team player. He could keep a team together.
I have yet to hear any proof or reason as to why CW will make a good coach. That is over any of the names mentioned by myself or other posters. I'd love to hear it.
As far as I can see, this is strictly a political game being played out by a couple of members of the APB and Dragon promo.
Its a joke and like other recent moves, will only come around to bite them in the butt eventually.
Probably sooner than later, the way they are going about it.
I always thought that in order to be a good coach or mentor, that your team
would look up to you in admiration, for your past achievements, talent and knowledge of the game.
This, I believe you could easily find in the likes of Nick, Buddy, Mike M, Jim R and yes even Earl. CW? No way. I doubt he could give any of the players a real run for the money. In their day, any of the names I mentioned could have done it. Even now it would be foolish to assume that any of them couldn't keep up to them because perhaps they are past their prime.
Earl could whack any of them hard on any given day.
Even a youngster like Dennis would be a far better choice. Hes animated and a team player. He could keep a team together.
I have yet to hear any proof or reason as to why CW will make a good coach. That is over any of the names mentioned by myself or other posters. I'd love to hear it.
As far as I can see, this is strictly a political game being played out by a couple of members of the APB and Dragon promo.
Its a joke and like other recent moves, will only come around to bite them in the butt eventually.
Probably sooner than later, the way they are going about it.
Last edited:
I guess we could see if the Enron boys or Bernie Madoff have any cash left over for a pool tour...
Lou Figueroa
since we don't seem to care
where the dough comes from