Use escrow service, that is what it is there for. I would NEVER buy a cue sight unseen from ANYONE without using escrow.
I need the forms help and opinion
- Thread starter cornerstone
- Start date
you need to talk on the phone. two guys both writing unintelligible sentences cant ever get a real feeling on what the other is offering.
since he is mad i would gladly take the 1000 and take your small loss for your mistake in the dealings.
before you get nothing from him.
since he is mad i would gladly take the 1000 and take your small loss for your mistake in the dealings.
before you get nothing from him.
I know less about cues than almost anyone , but even I can tell that Scruggs is beat up pretty bad.
The guy you dealt with is probably telling himself what a clever hustler he is .
It's a shame , but the world is getting worse every day.
Everybody wants to be a "winner", and they don't care how they get there.
The guy you dealt with is probably telling himself what a clever hustler he is .
It's a shame , but the world is getting worse every day.
Everybody wants to be a "winner", and they don't care how they get there.
. .
Last edited:
I think Bill got screwed badly.
Even if the check had been included, the transaction was entirely predicated on the Scruggs cue
being as originally described which was the underlying basis for determining the terms of the trade.
Now Bill has a Scruggs cue that he can't present to the public the same way it was presented to him.
He was supposed to get a brand new-unchalked Scruggs cue & got a damaged, used Scruggs cue.
Bill cannot sell this cue & recover the value he allowed towards the Vollmer cue he gave up in trade.
He now is stuck with a cue that is used & damaged and the bottomline is he was lied to on the deal.
the best thing is to reverse the entire deal and both parties eat their shipping costs. Trying to salvage
this is akin to trying to turn chicken shit into chicken salad. It may look nice but it still tastes like shit.
Matt B.
p.s. Bill is a honest person and I'd trust him with my wallet and, in fact, have in the past previously
having done business with him. I'm eager to do more business with Bill again and he knows that.
Even if the check had been included, the transaction was entirely predicated on the Scruggs cue
being as originally described which was the underlying basis for determining the terms of the trade.
Now Bill has a Scruggs cue that he can't present to the public the same way it was presented to him.
He was supposed to get a brand new-unchalked Scruggs cue & got a damaged, used Scruggs cue.
Bill cannot sell this cue & recover the value he allowed towards the Vollmer cue he gave up in trade.
He now is stuck with a cue that is used & damaged and the bottomline is he was lied to on the deal.
the best thing is to reverse the entire deal and both parties eat their shipping costs. Trying to salvage
this is akin to trying to turn chicken shit into chicken salad. It may look nice but it still tastes like shit.
Matt B.
p.s. Bill is a honest person and I'd trust him with my wallet and, in fact, have in the past previously
having done business with him. I'm eager to do more business with Bill again and he knows that.
lawrence526
Registered
Occasionally no matter how much we know, we get taught a lesson that just bites the heck out of us, been there, done that and feel your pain down in Indiana, Larry............