I understand that there are variations of the rules but this one sounded a little odd to me.
On the break my opponent pocketed two solids and took his next shot. He went for another solid and missed.
I made a move to shoot for a solid because to me the table was still open and he stopped me with the claim that if you sink two of the same balls off the break you are automatically shooting for that kind of ball.
People around us were wishy washy about it but I stood my ground and threatened to leave the game because of precedence. I eventually made the shot for solids but lost the game.
Does that rule sound absurd to anyone else but me?
On the break my opponent pocketed two solids and took his next shot. He went for another solid and missed.
I made a move to shoot for a solid because to me the table was still open and he stopped me with the claim that if you sink two of the same balls off the break you are automatically shooting for that kind of ball.
People around us were wishy washy about it but I stood my ground and threatened to leave the game because of precedence. I eventually made the shot for solids but lost the game.
Does that rule sound absurd to anyone else but me?