Idcues on E-Bay, Leonard and David Wale

ldcues said:
Your right, what was I thinking? Evan had the cue in his shop. You don't know when, but he did. The structural problems were so bad, he declined the work. But then, a mystery person worked on the cue that had been so crooked and repaired so poorly. And low and behold a beautiful butterfly appears from the mystery cue repairman's shop. (Who must be a damn cue repair genious to fix the horrible structural problems not to mention straighten the obvious warp it once had without affecting the evenness or esthetic beauty of any of the four points) I must not be thinking straight.

Dave

You show no respect for Evan Clarke whatsoever. He doesn't like it when someone messes up his or Bob Runde's work.

Evan Clarke said the cue came with a matching inlay on the other side. Evan said he inspected it and someone had machined it out. Do you really not think Evan Clarke who is a master cue builder, knows that this can be done? You kept saying over and over that Runde built the cue.

I called Bob Runde today at home and he told he never built, nor would he build, a cue with an inlay in one of the four points, even if it was special ordered. He said he would match the two windows and put in a 2nd inlay on the opposite side. He said he wouldn't put his name on a cue with such as design imbalance.

That nobody who obtained such an odd cue would have figured this out and questioned it is beyond me. The fact that your ad omitted the missing inlay says to me it was not a mistake.

How about a refund for Bill now?

Chris
 
Last edited:
Really.

TATE said:
You show no respect for Evan Clarke whatsoever. He doesn't like it when someone messes up his or Bob Runde's work.

Evan Clarke said the cue came with a matching inlay on the other side. Evan said he inspected it and someone had machined it out. Do you really not think Evan Clarke who is a master cue builder, knows that this can be done? You kept saying over and over that Runde built the cue.

I called Bob Runde today at home and he told he never built, nor would he build, a cue with an inlay in one of the four points, even if it was special ordered. He said he would match the two windows and put in a 2nd inlay on the opposite side. He said he wouldn't put his name on a cue with such as design imbalance.

That nobody who obtained such an odd cue would have figured this out and questioned it is beyond me. The fact that your ad omitted the missing inlay says to me it was not a mistake.

How about a refund for Bill now?

Chris


Wow,

He said the exact same thing you did. I guess you hit the nail right on the head, huh? And you are also alledging Evan Clark built this cue... Is that correct? And your initial post, about somebody sanding through the inlay, you just decided to throw that in there?

In this in depth conversation, did he explain how the cue still looks perfect after somebody supposedly machined the inlay out?

And do not tell me whom I do or do not have respect for. The disrespect is aimed solely your way. If you would make reference to what was written in the email, it would probably make it easier to believe. But you mentioned sanding and straightening and turning and none of those words appear in the email.

So, send me Rundes number so I can call him. Send it my email. And no stories please. There are two things that baffle me. 1. Having Rundes home number, why did you wait so long to call him? 2. It surprises me you didn't ask him or Evan Clark to post something on here. That would certainly seem like it would be pretty high up on the priority list.

And what was all the drama about "mystery solved stay posted"? I figured you were writing a book or something. Anyhow, give me Rundes' phone number so I can give him a call.

Dave
 
ldcues said:
And what was all the drama about "mystery solved stay posted"? I figured you were writing a book or something. Anyhow, give me Rundes' phone number so I can give him a call.

Dave

David,

(262) 857-6533 Bob Runde (Bob said it was OK to give out his number, he doesn't mind getting called about this). Why don't you call Evan too on Monday (414) 383-9661 at the Schon cues office.

Be a stand up guy and take the cue back or refund Bill something for his loss.

Chris
 
Jack Justis said:
Dick,
You are to be commended for stepping up and providing this information to help settle this matter once and for all. I have known Leonard and Dave Wales for the past 15 years and they are an honest, hard working family who in my opinion would never deceive or intentionally tell someone something they did not believe was the truth. Anyone making 200 sales on ebay without any negative feedback should tell you something about their character. They deserve an apology on this one.

Jack,

I sure hope this matter can be resolved in a timely fashion without causing all the parties involved any more unnecessary embarrassment.

I know you are a man of your words and you do not speak on behalf of anyone lightly on a public forum.

Personally, I would like to see this issue taken care of in private. I would hate to see the reputations of anyone being tarnished.

By the way, how is the sales of your light weight case going? I am looking forward to seeing them at the US Open. ;) How many will you be bringing down?

Richard
 
Last edited:
ldcues said:
And do not tell me whom I do or do not have respect for. The disrespect is aimed solely your way.

Dave

Dave,

It's OK for you to disrespect me. I can be a real prick. I get on a lot of peoples nerves.

But Bill has been a real gentleman. He's all class. You should just be dealing with him.

Chris
 
TATE said:
Dave,

It's OK for you to disrespect me. I can be a real prick. I get on a lot of peoples nerves.

Chris


Damn Chris...now I know why we've gotten along so well together and like each other. You're a man of my own heart...and vice versa. :p :D
 
drivermaker said:
Damn Chris...now I know why we've gotten along so well together and like each other. You're a man of my own heart...and vice versa. :p :D

Don't go soft on me now!

Get that cue and come on out here for a drink - I'm sending you a ticket!

Chris
 
IDCues NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY, THE EVIDENCE IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU.

All someone has to do is look at the cue on ebay and read your description. You PURPOSELY only showed the side of the cue with the inlay, and DID NOT mention anything about the other side of the CUE. NOW, THE PERSON WHO BOUGHT THE CUE HAS BEEN DECIEVED AND WANTS A REFUND. CHRIS MAKES THIS KNOWN PUBLIC, AND YOU THROW A BITCH FIT.

IDCUES, YOU NEED TO GROW SOME BALLS BUDDY, YOU ARE A POOR BUSINESSMAN AND A CON ARTIST, NOBODY GIVES A SHIT IF ALL OF YOUR OTHER FEEDBACK IS POSITIVE. DOES THAT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO FRAUD AND CON SOMEONE ELSE? THATS WHAT I THOUGHT, LOSER.
 
LastTwo said:
You PURPOSELY only showed the side of the cue with the inlay, and DID NOT mention anything about the other side of the CUE. .

Last Two,
Wow, you must have forgotten that he's a "nice guy." Oh wait, I just saw a television special on Jeffrey Dahmer and all of his family and neighbors kept saying what a nice guy he was.... please ignore this post.


P.S. - doesn't anyone besides me find it ironic that in that whole thread there are several mentions of "highly respected cue dealers" (a little close to an oxymoron for my taste), "he's no fly by night cue dealer" (is there any other kind?), "he's a nice, honest guy" (what does being nice have to do with selling potentially stolen merchandise - yes, I know the thread was about a defective, falsely advertised cue, but I'm on a roll). I always find it self-serving when these cue dealers/collectors start complimenting one another about their integrity and honesty (I would believe it more readily coming from a used car dealer, since his merchandise is less likely to be stolen). Just because a lot of nice people engage in this hobby/profession does not make it any more reputable.

The most telling comment (?from Tate?) was when he described tracing the lineage of a cue as EXTREMELY difficult. Very true; and I'm afraid many cue dealers/collectors don't make enough effort in this regard. JMO.

At least these guys aren't as bad as the art dealers (who deal in works much more expensive than cues). A friend was in Chicago, looking for a Boulanger, was referred to a large art dealer and told, "well, you have to prove you are not a cop, then ask to see the works in the special back room." Those guys are REALLY sleazy.
 
Last edited:
LastTwo said:
IDCues NO MATTER WHAT YOU SAY, THE EVIDENCE IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU.

OK Boys, Let's give David a chance to sort through this and make it right. Sounds like a lot of people were confused about this cue.

Chris
 
nipponbilliards said:
Jack,

I sure hope this matter can be resolved in a timely fashion without causing all the parties involved any more unnecessary embarrassment.

Richard

Richard,

Thank you for your positive comments. Frankly, we were all a little surprised at the way this story unraveled. It seems like there was a lot more to it than we all thought, including Jack, whom I have the utmost respect for.

Chris
 
drivermaker said:
...he should be black-balled and boycotted. Now, if David has HIS side of the story to tell...here we are with open ears. Come in David.....

Hey hay!! Watch it, pal! I had nothing to do with this and refuse to let him be me. He sounds like a real triple-slick POS ripoff artist.

SCAMMERS SUCK! GIVE THE GUY HIS $ BACK
 
point toward the reflection

Guru said:
eth·ics ('e-thks)
n.

The rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or the conduct of the members of a profession.


You clearly lack the above.


Hello,

You change a quote that I had supposedly written, sign my name to it and then throw the word ethics around as though it might be something you have practiced in your lifetime. Sorry, I forgot to mention brutalizing the phonetics. Moronic... ironic... what would you call it?

Dave
 
ldcues said:
Hello,

You change a quote that I had supposedly written, sign my name to it and then throw the word ethics around as though it might be something you have practiced in your lifetime. Sorry, I forgot to mention brutalizing the phonetics. Moronic... ironic... what would you call it?

Dave
Well, you seem to know more than everyone about everything. Now even the dictionary is wrong. You're some piece of work. Dictionary.com: Ethics It was a cut n paste, moron.

You must need another picture to esplain it to you, Lucy.
 

Attachments

  • bullshit.jpg
    bullshit.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 298
Guru said:
Well, you seem to know more than everyone about everything. Now even the dictionary is wrong. You're some piece of work. Dictionary.com: Ethics It was a cut n paste, moron.

You must need another picture to esplain it to you, Lucy.

Oh I apologize, nothing on the internet is ever wrong! Why don't you get off of your lazy ass and go get a dictionary and perhaps CHECK!!! before you cut and paste. You no named little person! I'm sure you take comfort in knowing you'll have a reserved place within the moronic fringe of the community! Idiot! Do some of your own work every now and again! GURU!?!!! HAH!!!

David Wale
 
Guru said:
Well, you seem to know more than everyone about everything. Now even the dictionary is wrong. You're some piece of work. Dictionary.com: Ethics It was a cut n paste, moron.

You must need another picture to esplain it to you, Lucy.

LMAO!!!!! He is clearly nuts if he couldn't realize that was from the dictionary LOL what dull guy...
 
TATE said:
David,

(262) 857-6533 Bob Runde (Bob said it was OK to give out his number, he doesn't mind getting called about this). Why don't you call Evan too on Monday (414) 383-9661 at the Schon cues office.

Be a stand up guy and take the cue back or refund Bill something for his loss.

Chris

Hello Chris,

Okay, I have given the phone numbers to my father. (the owner of the cue) He is going to call Runde and Clark and the person the cue was purchased from, via conference call. Then, Bill Loucks (the buyer of the cue) will be informed of the outcome. Although my job as a professional nothing (which happens to pay very well) will hinder me from posting during the week, if I hear anything interesting I'll try to post next Friday night.

This posting stuff kind of gives the trash talking hotheads, who most likely can't really get there, a chance to utter defamatory statements and slander peoples' names as they see fit. And thereby voicing their opinions without any repercussion. I'm sure this one will get it's share. Gentleman, take an example from Mr. F. Agnir, he doesn't jump to conclusions he gathers facts, makes a point and doesn't wander aimlessly placing blame left and right.

Although I have written it a few times, I'm still not sure anybody is aware this was not my cue. I will argue to the end on my fathers' behalf, but the final decision is his. He told me not to write anything on here from the beginning, but the guy started in on my private parts. Even somebody that couldn't get there would have jumped on that! Furthermore, Chris did not buy this cue, Bill Loucks did. Apparently, he will argue until the end as well. (I have the funniest feeling he does much arguing on this forum) But, it comes down to the final outcome being decided by them, regardless of outside opinion.

By the way Chris, the Eddie Laube we originnally bought from you way back when, by way of eBay auction. In your description you said it was pictured in the "Billiard Encyclopedia". Well, you were wrong! That's not it. Was that a mistake? Because I know people make mistakes. Did you know those two cues were not the same? And just to prove what I have been saying about what our business ethics were when we were in the business, "Did we ever cry to the masses about you lying on purpose?" Did we tell everybody you were a scam artist? No, we looked at your feedback and we figured you made a mistake. Now, if you don't want to comment on this, that's fine. But if you try to say it is not true, don't think just because it took place two and a half years ago we don't have the proof. Dick Abbott is not the only person that saves everything, Leonard Wale does too.

Jack Justis still makes the best case in the world!

Regards,
David Wale
 
ldcues said:
Hello Chris,

Okay, I have given the phone numbers to my father. (the owner of the cue) He is going to call Runde and Clark and the person the cue was purchased from, via conference call. Then, Bill Loucks (the buyer of the cue) will be informed of the outcome. Although my job as a professional nothing (which happens to pay very well) will hinder me from posting during the week, if I hear anything interesting I'll try to post next Friday night.

This posting stuff kind of gives the trash talking hotheads, who most likely can't really get there, a chance to utter defamatory statements and slander peoples' names as they see fit. And thereby voicing their opinions without any repercussion. I'm sure this one will get it's share. Gentleman, take an example from Mr. F. Agnir, he doesn't jump to conclusions he gathers facts, makes a point and doesn't wander aimlessly placing blame left and right.

Although I have written it a few times, I'm still not sure anybody is aware this was not my cue. I will argue to the end on my fathers' behalf, but the final decision is his. He told me not to write anything on here from the beginning, but the guy started in on my private parts. Even somebody that couldn't get there would have jumped on that! Furthermore, Chris did not buy this cue, Bill Loucks did. Apparently, he will argue until the end as well. (I have the funniest feeling he does much arguing on this forum) But, it comes down to the final outcome being decided by them, regardless of outside opinion.

By the way Chris, the Eddie Laube we originnally bought from you way back when, by way of eBay auction. In your description you said it was pictured in the "Billiard Encyclopedia". Well, you were wrong! That's not it. Was that a mistake? Because I know people make mistakes. Did you know those two cues were not the same? And just to prove what I have been saying about what our business ethics were when we were in the business, "Did we ever cry to the masses about you lying on purpose?" Did we tell everybody you were a scam artist? No, we looked at your feedback and we figured you made a mistake. Now, if you don't want to comment on this, that's fine. But if you try to say it is not true, don't think just because it took place two and a half years ago we don't have the proof. Dick Abbott is not the only person that saves everything, Leonard Wale does too.

Jack Justis still makes the best case in the world!

Regards,
David Wale

David,

All I wanted was a reasonable conclusion to this event. My friend Bill is a great guy. I am hoping that the name calling and insults on both sides of the board can now end.

You and me, Leonard and Bill are all a lot more alike than we may care to think. We are all family men, pool cue and memorabilia collectors, players, and enthusiasts, and we all have a sense of pride in ourselves and what we do. You have friends I respect who have said nice things about you and your family.

Idcues didn't get to 200 positive feedbacks for nothing. You worked hard and did well to get there. You were honest, careful, and accurate. Well, I didn't get to 239 100% positive feedback rating for nothing either.tateUTS

I've sold a lot of cues as well and always offered a 100% guaranteed return policy, no questions asked. Believe it or not, I've only had 2 cues returned. Sure, it's a pain in the ass and disappointing, but it comes with the territory. I've also offered and paid for, repairs on two cues buyers wished to keep - both forearm refinishes because of a smudge or scratch. $125 bucks, big deal. I've bought a few stinkers too like all of us and it is part of the learning curve.

I've always believed in excellent customer service. That was my training early in my business career. If you look at my feedback where I was the seller, you will see many people truly pleased with their cue and the service. From a limited education and humble beginnings in life, I've built my own business (another industry). I just like seeing people get really excited about things, and if they're not I try really hard to make it right. The reward to me has been extremely loyal customers for my whole career. It's hard to compete with someone when their customers are 100% loyal.

No matter what, I refuse to mistrust people. I've found that most people are incredibly honest. One of the people I admire in this regard is Bill Loucks . His honesty is brutal. He sold a couple of cues he didn't like and had nearly bad mouthed them in the ad (and somehow got more money for the cues than I would have ever believed). I observe Bill and learn from him. He takes his lumps, but money cannot buy the respect I have for him.

If I made a mistake on the Laube ad, I apologize. It certainly is within my capabilities to make a mistake. I will offer to take the cue back from you or the current owner for a full refund, no questions asked, plus 15% annually on the amount you paid. I will cover all shipping and insurance costs.

In any case, I am confident this will come to a reasonable conclusion. Please thank your father for me for making the effort.

Best wishes,

Chris
 
Last edited:
Pizza Bob said:
I certainly don't doubt Dick's word, and his photo's speak for themselves. But, as I said in a previous post and was reiterated by Guru, don't you think the fact that it only had one inlay was noteworthy? Shouldn't this have been disclosed in the original Ebay description, along with the fact that there was no logo on the butt cap? This whole thread would be moot if that had been the case. Those things didn't happen and the buyer was dissatisfied as a result. The buyer's money should have been refunded due to those omissions - simple.

Adios,

Pizza Bob
It would seem to me that the cue may be even more valuable than previously thought, wouldn't it? I mean, being so rare and all with the inlays only in one point...if it is original???
 
Last edited:
Back
Top