pharaoh68 said:So wait. You mean to say that out of every cuemaker out there who makes beautiful, top notch, incredible playing cues, your pipcks would be Bob Dzuricky (sp?) and Micky Stacy?!?!?!?! All I can say is.... wow. (And not in a good way).
pharaoh68 said:So wait. You mean to say that out of every cuemaker out there who makes beautiful, top notch, incredible playing cues, your pipcks would be Bob Dzuricky (sp?) and Micky Stacy?!?!?!?! All I can say is.... wow. (And not in a good way).
duke@neo.rr.com said:hey, if you wanna play with something else, by all means...do, but this is the only answer you picked out? so...xidica's answer of Steve Klein's cues is fine, though huh? you amaze me. you guys find nothing more interesting than busting MY balls about every frickin thing while someone else can mention pretty much the same thing, and get away with it!![]()
its no wonder the really good players don't come here and post or even read...some of you guys here are just ***holes...and you seem to be the leader of the pack!! both of MY choices make EXCELLENT cues. just cause they don't have so-called "collector value" means nothing to me...uhh, I'll even tell ya' what...you get whatever "collector" worthy cue you want and come play me with my "junk" cues and lets see who can win? I'll guarantee you won't like the outcome...and yes, we can play for money, no problem there! some of you guys simply amaze me with your thinking of "if its not a Scruggs, Gina, southwest, etc...its NO GOOD!!!" those names I just said are accomplished cuemakers who have been doing this for a long time, and should have NO bearing on the "up-and-coming" cuemakers of the future...but I guess your mind is as closed as most. I'm done arguing with you over this, you have no basis for comparison anyways and are not open to anyone's cue except the "big name" guys...so pay a fortune for something you can get for 1/3 of the price without a "name" on it...leave me alone, you're confused!!
Southpaw said:I'm sorry, didnt you ask for peoples OPINION about what cues they liked and why? I for one never criticized anyones choices. I simply answered the question that was proposed in the thread. If you are afraid to hear other people's opinions, then you should be careful what you ask them. And, I will take you up on your offer to play some.
Southpaw
duke@neo.rr.com said:ok, I guess my "what and why" question isn't good enough due to all the "just WHAT" answers...so I'll rephrase that. I have an idea as to what you guys would buy cause of the resale value...I get it, but I'm talking about PLAYING CUES. which cue do you think plays well enough to use daily, and why is it like that? feedback, response of shaft, solid hit, etc...I'm looking for REAL answers here guys, not just "cause I like them".
duke@neo.rr.com said:ok, I guess my "what and why" question isn't good enough due to all the "just WHAT" answers...so I'll rephrase that. I have an idea as to what you guys would buy cause of the resale value...I get it, but I'm talking about PLAYING CUES. which cue do you think plays well enough to use daily, and why is it like that? feedback, response of shaft, solid hit, etc...I'm looking for REAL answers here guys, not just "cause I like them". answers like the ones I'm getting are doing me no good...I want to know an honest reason as to WHY you'd pick what you would, and resale value means nothing...its all about playability in this thread for me. so c'mon, give me better answers guys
Jeff, it sounds like you are wanting us to describe how the cue hits, and that is not possible because HIT is subjective. Sure...some players say their cue hits "a ton'', "like a cannon", "has a monster hit", and etc., etc.duke@neo.rr.com said:which cue do you think plays well enough to use daily, and why is it like that? feedback, response of shaft, solid hit, etc...I'm looking for REAL answers here guys,