Unreal that people are debating this. I'm sad for humanity.
I'm with you on this one
Unreal that people are debating this. I'm sad for humanity.
Unreal that people are debating this. I'm sad for humanity.
Now you are contradicting yourself. The rules don't mention this as a foul, therefore...
ya can't fix stupid![]()
I'm surprised that the FFB does not follow the WPA rules. They seem to be using a modified set that is at least 7 years old. You may want to ask your representative why they don't follow the WPA rules. Here they are: http://www.wpa-pool.com/web/the_rules_of_play and in particular look at Section 6 for unsportsmanlike conduct, which includes:Thanks for all your replies and opinions!
As the tournament was run by the French Billiards Federation, we were using their rules, which are here for anyone who understands French!
http://www.ffbillard.com/telechargements.html?dossier=23707&id_discipline=4
I had a read through and interestingly it seems that this case isn't properly accounted for in the rules. It is stated that hitting any ball other than the cue ball is a foul, but there is no mention of putting the illegally struck ball (in this case the 9) back to the position where it was before the foul.
That sounds like a fairer outcome - is that what is known as 'all ball fouls' rules? Maybe we need to get these rules added to the federation rulebook, so that this can be avoided in future! We're a fairly small community of pool players in France, so I'll lobby the representatives and see what we can do.
Did you miss the part where the fouler just knocked the 9 into the pocket without the cue ball being involved in any way? He just pushed the 9 in with his tip. He didn't try to shoot any shot. He never hit the cue ball with his stick.Sounds like a regular ball in hand.
Someone pockets the 9 and opponent gets ball in hand and the 9 is spotted....keep shooting.
Happens all the time. No biggie.
I'm surprised that the FFB does not follow the WPA rules. They seem to be using a modified set that is at least 7 years old. You may want to ask your representative why they don't follow the WPA rules. Here they are: http://www.wpa-pool.com/web/the_rules_of_play and in particular look at Section 6 for unsportsmanlike conduct, which includes:
(b) changing the position of the balls in play other than by a shot;
I guess you didn't realize you were in integral part of the debate when you suggested those involved "can't be fixed".
Intentionally shooting the nine ball in the pocket is loss of game. It is treated as a concession of the game. Really no different than someone taking their cue and raking the balls. Disturb the balls intentionally and you've conceded that game.
you're right. Because only you seem to believe it's OK to something so utterly ridiculous, that anyone that has played pool for only a couple years knows is not only against the rules but it is a complete Dbag move.
Sometimes the game is played by written rules. You may want to read those rules. Sometimes the rulings are not made just by someones gut feel.I change my mind and agree with Jay on this one. I feel its not loss of game due to unsportsmanlike even though it is unsportsmanlike but rather the offender conceded by pocketing the game winning ball with his cue. ...
Sometimes the game is played by written rules. You may want to read those rules. Sometimes the rulings are not made just by someones gut feel.
Which areas? Which rule sets?I sense there are a few too many areas in the rules that are ambiguous. Perhaps intentionally so.