smashmouth said:
IPT failure means pool will NEVER reach it's rightful place as a big-time spectator sport with big TV deals and high player earnings.
This whole IPT thing is really gonna allow us to gauge what kind
of demand there is among spectators for bigtime pro billiards in America.
opinions?
The key word for me is highlighted in red:
America
Pool in the American culture doesn't seem to have as good a fit as it does overseas, namely Philippines, Taiwan, and even some parts of Europe. This is my opinion as an American.
If it ever becomes apparent that there is no interest in pool here in the States, it would seem prudent to this writer that the IPT will contemplate taking its tour and moving it to predominantly overseas locations, where pool "athletes" or "professionals" will be welcomed with open arms followed by big bucks.
If you look at the audiences overseas compared to the audiences here in America, it is also very telling. Pool events are more of an attraction in other countries, enjoying sell-out crowds, instead of the same faces of friends, family members, and railbird road-runners that make up the audience on the American tournament trail.
Do you think TV exposure will elevate pool as a sport here in the United States? Most Americans stereotypically think of pool players as the hustler playing in a smoke-filled opium den, where women aren't allowed.
On the other hand, Germany and Netherlands, two European examples, think of pool players as "athletes." I seem to remember reading that Niels Feijen was/is sponsored by the Olympic Committee of his country. Foreign sponsorship may bring a much-needed infusion of money into pool, which will keep the IPT engine running.
Again, as an American, I don't like these kinds of thoughts popping in my head, but it is a possible reality that comes to my mind when wondering about a successful future for pool. JMHO, FWIW!
JAM