PoolSharkAllen said:
John: It's great that last place pays $2000, however, it might be misleading to extrapolate and compare this to full-time workers or the US average. Subtract out say $1000 for travel expenses so that last place really nets $1000. Also factor in the considerable unpaid time spent training and it becomes apparent that this profession doesn't really pay that well for those on the bottom tier.
No, "the job" still pays far more than the average wage because the player is not required to play only on the IPT and thus has plenty of other income opportunities. The training cost is spread out over all of these opportunities. It could be argued that the IPT actually increases a player's income potential because the training required makes each IPT player more skilled and physically fitter. The expenses are part of the job and they are basically the same for all major tournaments. The difference is that all major tournaments do not pay just for showing up and no other major tournaments have the income potential of the IPT.
Also my math was flawed. If a player does not advance at all and makes the guaranteed $13,000 then they have essentially earned that for 48 hours of time, being present one day before the tournament starts and one playing day. That is so far above the average wage that we don't need to discuss it anymore.
If the IPT plays out according to Kevin's dream then the bottommost IPT tour player will be earning far in excess of the average wage. In fact, the $100,000 promise guarntees it.
But, for the sake of ending the argument I will agree that $13,000 for three weeks' worth of work and related high expenses is not the dream wage. $13,000 for doing something you do already though, and coupled with a shot at 8 million is definitely not being treated shabbily. You can spend as much trying to win the US Open 9 Ball tournament and take a chance on not even getting paid.
At least that's how I see it. I think that anyone who has a problem with the payouts is being completely nitty.
20 years ago it was a big deal when Nick Varner earned over $100,000 in a single year and he had to win something like ten tournaments to do it. Go back two years - pre IPT and you won't see earnings over $200,000 a year unless there is some kind of special event like the Challenge of Champions included (which everyone doesn't have the same earning opportunity). Next year there will be 150 pool players who will earn at least $100,000 for being pool players. Even if the IPT falls apart and that doesn't come to pass - no one has ever even had enough balls to dream of such an offer much less make one.
John