Cornerman said:
I love it. I play more 8-ball than the other games. I always have.
That being said, I don't think 8-ball is more strategic for the professionals. IMO, that's false hope. The professionals are such good shotmakers and position players that what is "proper strategy" and "proper patterns" (which the rest of us mere mortals should be striving for) are pretty much thrown out the window for these guys. They rarely play the "proper pattern," and they rarely get into any safety battles.
C-man,
I have to agree completely.
I just finished watching 2 matches from the LA 8 ball tournament in 2000 or 2001(tournament organized by Jay Helfert). In 2 long matches (Reyes-Immonen, Reyes-Archer) there was precious little strategy or safety play. The same level of play was evident in the DCC IPT qualifier this year.
I have had 2 very strong IPT players tell me the same thing (echoing Earl's oft repeated sentiment), that the game is too easy to differentiate the best players (ie. the best player is not guaranteed to win - the random results of the power break are a stronger determining factor than a small difference in skill level).
Here are the "Betmore Rules" for predicting the winner of any rack between the top pros (remember THESE GUYS ARE NOT SHORTSTOPS).
#1 - You miss a ball - you lose.
#2 - You fail to make a ball on the break - you lose.
#3 - You snooker yourself or miss position badly - you lose.
#4 - You make a ball on the break and have a clear shot - you win.
#5 - You fail to make a ball on the break and your opponent has a clear shot - you lose.
The corollary to these rules is that the first player to the table with a clear shot is the winner the large majority of the time. Like 9-ball, 8-ball is a great demonstration game to see the skills of the pro, but not the greatest way to differentiate the top players (that's why we have straight pool).