Cookoo
Cookoo
Cookoo
If it's good enough for the BCA, then it's good enough for the vast majority of the pool community. Me included.
And who is the BCA nowadays and who are the 2 guys at the BC A that none of us have ever heard of involved in approving anything. I would have to agree with one thing. If Guinness approved it under their microscope than it should be considered legit.
Guinness would have to see a whole unedited video not an edited video including seeing the 1st 200 balls that is not on the video that is being shown to people paying 50 bucks and having to sign a (NDA) to watch it.Also Guinness would dissect all the non standard conditions that we’re set up and that carnival table and probably destroy any chance of making it legit. Maybe someone should contact Guinness after all Schmidt and all the nuthuggers are calling it some kind of World record. I’m still at a loss as to what record it is?
Cranfield 768 is the highest run.
NDAs are detrimental, not just to cue sports, but to society as a whole.
What is John trying to hide? Is is just him, or is the BCA culpable as well. What about Charlie, John’s sponsors?
What it just John, or were e multiple shooters deployed?
I want the truth!
There is a difference between being a skeptic and a contrarian.
So what’s the truth? I don’t know and neither do you. The evidence is video that JS will not put out in unedited format for general release, for what is at this point in the proceedings dubious reasons. Recently we have learned that the well touted “BCA certification” of the run was accomplished by just two guys at the BCA office who may very well not know how to screw together a two-piece pool cue. Viewing has been limited with little to no word from anyone who isn’t family, friend, or fan. Who knows what we will learn next?
As to your suggestion that all publicity is good publicity, after many years in the PR bizaness I can assure that that is not so. Just ask Jussie Smollett.
Lou Figueroa
And who is the BCA nowadays and who are the 2 guys at the BC A that none of us have ever heard of involved in approving anything. I would have to agree with one thing. If Guinness approved it under their microscope than it should be considered legit.
Guinness would have to see a whole unedited video not an edited video including seeing the 1st 200 balls that is not on the video that is being shown to people paying 50 bucks and having to sign a (NDA) to watch it.Also Guinness would dissect all the non standard conditions that we’re set up and that carnival table and probably destroy any chance of making it legit. Maybe someone should contact Guinness after all Schmidt and all the nuthuggers are calling it some kind of World record. I’m still at a loss as to what record it is?
Cranfield 768 is the highest run.
Yes, because comparing a person committing a felony is "almost" the same thing as a pool player breaking a world record. LMAO PR bizness, huh?
What was the reason for Smollett concocting the original alleged assault scenario?
Cause he's as stupid as this thread.
Cause he's as stupid as this thread.
NDAs are detrimental, not just to cue sports, but to society as a whole.
What is John trying to hide? Is is just him, or is the BCA culpable as well. What about Charlie, John’s sponsors?
What it just John, or were e multiple shooters deployed?
I want the truth!
Let me see if I can help you understand...
What was the reason for Smollett concocting the original alleged assault scenario?
Lou Figueroa
I do wish he would come through Springfield, Mo and try me some bank on any sized table - he could even bring his little anvil - it would not help though. I don't think we can bank on it - can we Rj.![]()
I do wish he would come through Springfield, Mo and try me some bank on any sized table - he could even bring his little anvil - it would not help though. I don't think we can bank on it - can we Rj.![]()
Could someone please explain CTE to me?