Nah.... I don't think he'll be back, barring any other proclamations that get out via Facebook or other means. Not in this thread, anyway.
Then again, he might get bored, and come back to mix things up.
Have we all forgotten that Danny is radarx?
Nah.... I don't think he'll be back, barring any other proclamations that get out via Facebook or other means. Not in this thread, anyway.
Then again, he might get bored, and come back to mix things up.
Have we all forgotten that Danny is radarx?
Nah, DH shoots pool at an incredibly high level, but he can't structure a post like radarx.
Maybe he "can", but certainly never has, that I've seen.
Still only a handful of what-ifs and vaguely plausible possibility.Sorry Jeffyjazz. Radar is not xradarx, I am though. Maybe DH is not the only wily and paranoid creature who also thinks they are psychiatrists/psychologists and can just heap those accusations upon anyone that they choose to. Shame..Shame...
Not an easy one to forget?
Partly right on and nothing limiting trolling here!
Whoa there pardner!!! Summary from someones's questionable memory bank. 50 attendees, not one question from anyone and absolutely no answers from the presenters. Approximately 189 shots speedily talked over and we're supposed to believe that the viewer was super attentive and missed nothing at somewhere near 50 FPS to possibly 150 FPS. All of this while filling himself on free spaghetti and meatballs. Is this all you got for the free admission, and paid food???
Do you actually think that he counted each and every shot of the 627 shots?? I don' think so!!!
Easy! just continue...
im-posters everywhere, have to play some game when not playing pool. Perhaps you're still playing RPS. Who(m) knows? I changed the charade and decided to call a halt to feeding others' ego.
...
Do you actually think that he counted each and every shot of the 627 shots?? I don' think so!!!
...
Well, look what crawled out of jail....
Whoa there pardner!!! Summary from someones's questionable memory bank. 50 attendees, not one question from anyone and absolutely no answers from the presenters. Approximately 189 shots speedily talked over and we're supposed to believe that the viewer was super attentive and missed nothing at somewhere near 50 FPS to possibly 150 FPS. All of this while filling himself on free spaghetti and meatballs. Is this all you got for the free admission, and paid food???
Do you actually think that he counted each and every shot of the 627 shots?? I don' think so!!! ...
Using Bob's data, here's how the pace of play proceeded (approximately) throughout the run, for each group of 7 racks (98 balls):
1st 98 -- 24 min., or 4.1 balls per minute (bpm)
2nd 98 -- 28 min., 3.5 bpm
3rd 98 -- 34 min., 2.9 bpm
4th 98 -- 42 min., 2.3 bpm
5th 98 -- 47 min., 2.1 bpm
6th 98 -- 48 min., 2.0 bpm
final 38 balls -- 20 min., 1.9 bpm
Total -- 626 balls in 4 hrs and 3 min. (per prior info), 2.6 bpm
More from Bob's info:
Breaks from left side of rack -- 19
Breaks from right side of rack -- 20
Breaks from below rack -- 4
Breaks into a side pocket, cb in kitchen -- 2
As a 3rd generation 15 ball, I am not at all surprised. We've been kept down by whitey for hundreds of years.The data reveal some regrettable biases.
The only ball never used for a break ball was the 15-ball. That's just not right.
The 1-ball and 5-ball were most popular with 6 breaks each, and the 6-ball and 9-ball were close behind with 5 each.
The 10-ball and 11-ball were largely shunned, with just one usage apiece.
The data reveal some regrettable biases.
The only ball never used for a break ball was the 15-ball. That's just not right.
The 1-ball and 5-ball were most popular with 6 breaks each, and the 6-ball and 9-ball were close behind with 5 each.
The 10-ball and 11-ball were largely shunned, with just one usage apiece.
In the olden days, playing rotation, the 15 was the most prized.As a 3rd generation 15 ball, I am not at all surprised. We've been kept down by whitey for hundreds of years.
...
Pass the bong :thumbup:Data in it's pristine stage is the same as an unedited video. Transposed, it is as fallible as an edited video.
Data in it's pristine stage is the same as an unedited video. Transposed, it is as fallible as an edited video.