classiccues said:The issues associated with people who want to supply their own parts is they want you to make good when their part fails. In what I do, when people want me to supply a just labor price, I make sure that its spelled out ad nausem in my quotes and contracts that if they supply substandard material, the onus is squarely on them. I know alot of plumbers and electricians that won't do this because ultimately if you buy a cheap faucet and it leaks, or your light fixture goes poof, you call them back expecting a no charge change. Trust me for every person that would expect to be charged for this, their are 100 that would want the replacement for free. By charging a premium on the part, it does two things, covers a little overhead and may help with any material defect change they will need to support.
Ultimately its the end consumer that whines about the high price, yet it is the end consumer that dictates said price. Brutal cycle.
I wouldn't have an issue if the cuemaker rejected the idea, because I have been on both sides of the argument.
JV
I understand this point very well, Joe. And yes, there are those who will use crap parts to cut costs....I am not one of those...just avoiding the charge to cover the replacement of the part to stock. The ol' man is a plumber, and I get it completely. Mine is a case of simply knowing too much...lol.
As far as a cue goes, and supplying the wood....I'm not sure that I would consider going that route, but if I was considering it, I would contact the cuemaker prior to any discussion of design and cost, just to see what their particular guidelines might be, as to how long that particular variety required to be seasoned before it was viable for use in a cue. But it certainly would not be to cut costs, but rather, because perhaps I wanted a particular wood type, that perhaps the cuemaker currently did not have stocked, seasoned, and ready to go....it's the only reason I could think of for myself making such a request.
Lisa
Last edited: