Jayson Shaw 714 World Record 2 years ago

so you would bet against him as well to do it in 200 attempts? that is what you are saying.
You put up 5-10 players and they can have 200 attempts to break Jaysons 714 and you can bet what you can post. Minimum 25k per player. Now that’s what I’m saying.
 
Id give you all the players you can find 200 attempts to break 700 and you can bet any amount you can post up.
I believe the documents here for BCA recognition are current....

thanks bob, but it wont open for me unless i subscribe to word 365.
You put up 5-10 players and they can have 200 attempts to break Jaysons 714 and you can bet what you can post. Minimum 25k per player. Now that’s what I’m saying.
none of that is what i said. and you cant high roll me as i can bet a lot more than you can or have ever bet. that is so low class to take someones statement and apply it how you want and try to high roll them as you think you are something special. which you are not.
please put me on ignore.
 
but were they all of his caliber and made 200 attempts?
meaning play the game as well as him.
Svb and ruslan and earl?
That’s for you to decide if they’re the same caliber as Shaw

the number of attempts was all up to each player how much they felt like trying
Except one that had a visa thing or something
 
thanks bob, but it wont open for me unless i subscribe to word 365. ...
Try again, I have added PDFs to that directory.

There are probably free Word viewers around, but I have no idea which are not malware.
 
Gotta reiterate that the pockets are way too big; about as much mystique as a long distance trek to nowhere - last man standing. Backing off the critical sarcasm - no question the 2 JS s can make a lotta ballz but record runs should be pristine and elegant achievements.
 
thanks bob, but it wont open for me unless i subscribe to word 365.

none of that is what i said. and you cant high roll me as i can bet a lot more than you can or have ever bet. that is so low class to take someones statement and apply it how you want and try to high roll them as you think you are something special. which you are not.
please put me on ignore.
Quit simple as you said it’s easy for many players to do it so back it up and make it happen. No hard feelings at all. I’m not trying to high roll you at all just offering you some free cash since you think it’s that easy to break 700 with 200 attempts. And by the way I think you got zero chance of being able to bet more than me. I have no clue who you are but you can grab your cue and I’ll meet you anywhere in the world and play you any game and again bet whatever you can bet or afford.
Now that’s some funny shit. You simply just got put in your place for making a statement and running your mouth. You can now simply ignore my comments and put me on ignore but we all know now your all talk and will 100% respond back to my comment.
 
thanks bob, but it wont open for me unless i subscribe to word 365.

none of that is what i said. and you cant high roll me as i can bet a lot more than you can or have ever bet. that is so low class to take someones statement and apply it how you want and try to high roll them as you think you are something special. which you are not.
please put me on ignore.
Oh I think I might know who you are. Is your name Marty Herman?
 
Gotta reiterate that the pockets are way too big; about as much mystique as a long distance trek to nowhere - last man standing. Backing off the critical sarcasm - no question the 2 JS s can make a lotta ballz but record runs should be pristine and elegant achievements.
Gotta reiterate
For the 1000th time
the game was never meant to be played on tight pockets

Your supposed to make a lot of balls per turn and not take two weeks for a game
 
Gotta reiterate
For the 1000th time
the game was never meant to be played on tight pockets

Your supposed to make a lot of balls per turn and not take two weeks for a game
Known. Also dull. Ignorance is infinite. (this is just a general observation - not directed at anyone) There's new shit to be done in pool - anything for that matter. Look at F1 or Cardistry for that matter. They're just scratching the surface.
Never subscribed to the jock trials - "Let's see _you_ run N squared balls" etc...

FWIW I can manage 50s if I had a few months to settle into the zone lol. Nothing burger. The issue is the quality of performance - remedial.
 
Known. Also dull. Ignorance is infinite. (this is just a general observation - not directed at anyone) There's new shit to be done in pool - anything for that matter. Look at F1 or Cardistry for that matter. They're just scratching the surface.
Never subscribed to the jock trials - "Let's see _you_ run N squared balls" etc...

FWIW I can manage 50s if I had a few months to settle into the zone lol. Nothing burger. The issue is the quality of performance - remedial.

“Theres new shit to be done”
But I’d bet your a 9ball fan
Don’t care about cars or I’d be on a racing site
 
High run records should remain specific to the equipment it’s achieved upon. Just like golf, each course has its own incomparable course record independent of other courses.


Sent from my iPad using AzBilliards Forums
 
“Theres new shit to be done”
But I’d bet your a 9ball fan
Don’t care about cars or I’d be on a racing site
Not particularly. I mean straight pool. The equipment is almost there. Notably missing are synthetic chalkless tips, and some kind of carbon weave cloth; the general idea being 100% consistent equipment. Then players can then move on toward better breaks - even slicker, tricker breaks and of course super tight pockets.
 
Known. Also dull. Ignorance is infinite. (this is just a general observation - not directed at anyone) There's new shit to be done in pool - anything for that matter. Look at F1 or Cardistry for that matter. They're just scratching the surface.
Never subscribed to the jock trials - "Let's see _you_ run N squared balls" etc...

FWIW I can manage 50s if I had a few months to settle into the zone lol. Nothing burger. The issue is the quality of performance - remedial.
I ran 72 balls once and I want the BCA to post that as my high run record! I think it falls somewhere in the highest 100,000 runs ever recorded. :rolleyes:
 
I ran 72 balls once and I want the BCA to post that as my high run record! I think it falls somewhere in the highest 100,000 runs ever recorded. :rolleyes:
Jay I believe you and if you release the unedited video for all us to see than all the world will believe. The trouble is people say they break a record but keep private an unedited video for the public to see. Jaysons video is unedited and thousands of people have seen it,but can't say that about others.
 
Jay I believe you and if you release the unedited video for all us to see than all the world will believe. The trouble is people say they break a record but keep private an unedited video for the public to see. Jaysons video is unedited and thousands of people have seen it,but can't say that about others.
I have never doubted that Jayson made his run, whether it be accepted as 714 or 669 with an early foul deducting 45 balls. I have yet to hear any questions about how the balls were racked or anything else for that matter.

What I did see and hear about Schmidt's run caused me to question it until I've seen more. More so that the unedited video has never been put into wide release. Among the few who have seen it there appears to be some questions about the racking, position of the break ball and possible segments edited out. He may or may not have a legitimate claim to his 626 ball run. Of course the import of that run was diminished after Jayson surpassed it.
 
Last edited:
I have never doubted that Jayson made his run, whether it be accepted as 714 or 669 with an early foul deducting 45 balls. I have yet to hear any questions about how the balls were racked or anything else for that matter.

What I did see and hear about Schmidt's run caused me to question it until I've seen more. More so that the unedited video has never been put into wide release. Among the few who have seen it there appears to be some questions about the racking and possible segments edited out. He may or may not have a legitimate claim to his 626 ball run. Of course the import of that run was diminished after Jayson surpassed it.
Yes Jay I agree. With John having the biggest ego in Billiard History and the biggest bragger it shatters peoples minds how he didn’t release an unedited video.well many are aware of the numerous times he has cheated and taken short cuts. You don’t have to hear this from me as it’s known world wide. The money was not important to John for the 1st time in his life he choose to shy away from money as he held private little dinner shows with everybody holding each others hands and playing footsies from the start of the show until the end he got lots of people to praise him and pat him on his shoulders and his ego was getting satisfied.
That all went down the toilet when Jayson shattered the B.S. 626 claim.
Now nobody is interested in his run and wouldn’t pay a nickel except me. I’d be willing to pay $1,000 cash for an unedited copy if there is one from John. If it’s real why turn down free cash?
Several people claim to have seen his run so sell me a copy. Let’s get it reviewed by the 4 committees that the BCA put together to discredit Jaysons high run.
It does matter for history as it’s very disrespectful to the Mosconi family and the pool world if the run has editing or errors or fouls. Let’s see just how easy that table is. Let’s not forget the stunt he pulled in Canada with racking the balls an inch high to make room for the break ball to be able to be pocketed.
A few people on here or elsewhere claim to have seen an unedited video is no where near enough people and it needs to be seen by video technicians. Jaysons run was reviewed by several video technicians so fair is fair.
Good to hear from you Jay and hope to see you soon and chat. I’ll buy dinner next time I see you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ACL
Back
Top