Justin Bergman vs Tom Cousins

A year ago I didn’t even know who the guy was, but I like Tom Cousins in this. Justin’s cue ball is better, but I think TC’s patterns are better and his cue ball is good enough. I think they’re very even and it’ll be a fun match to watch
 
I"m curious about this, as well. Ultimate Pool rules is alternate breaks, I believe.

The way pros playing barbox 8b goes, if it's winner breaks then it could be 30-0. Alternate break, 30-29. In either case, whoever wins the lag is a big favorite.
If you believe that it means that you have not watched much of the UPUSA play. Dry breaks are pretty common. Scratching on the break is not uncommon as is being hooked after the break and sometimes pro's miss, even on a barbox. I know its hard to believe because all barbox haters make every single ball on the "kiddie table" and cant be bothered to even acknowledge they exist because the game is just so damn easy on a barbox.
 
A year ago I didn’t even know who the guy was, but I like Tom Cousins in this. Justin’s cue ball is better, but I think TC’s patterns are better and his cue ball is good enough. I think they’re very even and it’ll be a fun match to watch
I don't know if I would say Cousin's patterns are better but he does have a way of getting around the table with minimal cue ball movement. That seems to be a common trait for most Brits.
 
who is putting up the 100 thousand dollars they are playing for. is it winner take all.

or are the players putting up the money or a big part of it. otherwise in the middle is bullshit.

how come after the win you never see the winner getting a 100k check in his name. guess why?
 
I don't know if I would say Cousin's patterns are better but he does have a way of getting around the table with minimal cue ball movement. That seems to be a common trait for most Brits.
That's how I'd define pattern play. If you can run out with minimal cue ball movement and all easy shots, your patterns are real good. I can't remember which event it was, but I seem to remember watching Tom Cousins carry his ~450 fargo partner deep in the mixed doubles tournament a few months back.
 
who is putting up the 100 thousand dollars they are playing for. is it winner take all.

or are the players putting up the money or a big part of it. otherwise in the middle is bullshit.

how come after the win you never see the winner getting a 100k check in his name. guess why?
I'm with you, the $ amount in the middle doesn't mean much to me. It's promoted that way to make it seem like the players have a ton of pressure on them, in reality they're often free-rolling or close to it
 
Tom Jones has brown curly hair but he's never won a UPUSA event. He was won on the pro tour over there.
Yes, thank you. I looked up his picture that's the guy I remember watching one match. I thought he was in the finals and won. Maybe it was a match just before the finals I remember.
 
I"m curious about this, as well. Ultimate Pool rules is alternate breaks, I believe.

The way pros playing barbox 8b goes, if it's winner breaks then it could be 30-0. Alternate break, 30-29. In either case, whoever wins the lag is a big favorite.
If they are using UP rules (alternate break, 8 racked on the spot) I don't think Bergman stands a chance.
 
Back
Top