How long before somebody else comes out with something similar for more like a buck? I am amazed it has not happened yet.
I don't think anyone in a meaningful match will skip chalking because of the brand they're using. I think this is the big mistake people make about Kamuii. There's just no way in hell you're going to draw a ball 7 feet and think, "Oh, don't bother chalking. I did that last game." That's insane.
Kamuii chalk is more reliable. It's a better product. It greatly reduces a player's amount of miscues. Nobody is going to argue with that. It's also $25-$30 per cube. I understand it if a player wishes to chalk a little less but I think such a strategy will only get you in trouble. A player should always chalk before every shot. They should check their tip before executing any extreme-spin shot no matter what brand they're using.
I argue with that. So far it's all claims with no objective evidence.
pj
chgo
Part of the allure of something like this is the exclusivity of it. If someone made a run of the material at a substantially lower price then it loses that aspect.
People like to state that they'd buy Kamui at $5 (or some arbitrary figure), and while that may be true, my guess is that at least some of those people actually wouldn't. Kamui gets most of the discussion because of its high price, not in spite of it. People often buy it for no other reason than to see what can be so special about a cube of chalk that costs that much. Once bought people will often subconsciously rationalize the cost to themselves. Psychology is a big reason much of the anecdotal claims, regardless of whether of one's bias, are so suspect as evidence.
If it were $5, you'd still have an incredible mark-up from the current prices from top competitors.
But could you sell $5 chalk without the exclusivity?
Luxury cars could be produced significantly less than they already are. They're often throwing components in that aren't necessarily better, just more exotic.
Now, if we reduced the price of the car to something more resembling what most would consider reasonable, how would that affect sales? Does owning a Ferrari mean as much without the prestige of owning such a thing......a prestige that is at least partially created by price and intentionally limited production numbers.
Kamui does the same thing, with the same target in mind. We can pull up just about any of the numerous threads on this board alone and find at least a handful of people who express their pride in the fact they bought a piece of chalk that cost that much. It's more than curiosity that's attracting these cats. The mere fact people did pay that much can cause people to believe the item is doing more than it may be doing as a mechanism to convince themselves of some merit in the decision. It can also do the opposite and create a negative expectation in the consumer's mind feeling that such a product that far out of its expected price range couldn't possibly be worth it.
We've certainly seen both sides. Kamui has a carefully considered marketing strategy here and that includes price.
I have used it, but only very briefly. It was a borrowed cube that I had to return right away, so I didn't get to do any experiments, but I also didn't notice any obvious improvement over Masters.I'm not sure you've used it yet or not but in case you haven't, the moment you do, you'll quickly see why this stuff is going to do what everyone claims it does.
I have used it, but only very briefly. It was a borrowed cube that I had to return right away, so I didn't get to do any experiments, but I also didn't notice any obvious improvement over Masters.
pj
chgo
That's not going to happen. As I've said before, I don't have a $25-$30 problem with Masters....you really need to get your own cube
That's not going to happen. As I've said before, I don't have a $25-$30 problem with Masters.
pj
chgo
I don't have to "care" in order to know and say the claims are unsupported.Jude:
...why would you care about objective evidence? You're not going to use it because it's $25.
I don't have to "care" in order to know and say the claims are unsupported.
pj
chgo
It would make compliance much easier if you'd post your criteria for who should comment on what subject, Jude. Maybe the mods will make a sticky for you.Is this some strange game you're playing. The thread is about chalk you've barely used and have no interest in using. You're an amateur lawyer and practicing cross-examination!
It would make compliance much easier if you'd post your criteria for who should comment on what subject, Jude. Maybe the mods will make a sticky for you.
pj
chgo
A minor fender bender.Sorry, feel free to flame as you please.
If it were $5, you'd still have an incredible mark-up from the current prices from top competitors.
Part of the allure of something like this is the exclusivity of it. If someone made a run of the material at a substantially lower price then it loses that aspect.
People like to state that they'd buy Kamui at $5 (or some arbitrary figure), and while that may be true, my guess is that at least some of those people actually wouldn't. Kamui gets most of the discussion because of its high price, not in spite of it. People often buy it for no other reason than to see what can be so special about a cube of chalk that costs that much. Once bought people will often subconsciously rationalize the cost to themselves. Psychology is a big reason much of the anecdotal claims, regardless of whether of one's bias, are so suspect as evidence.