The "old school" players would scoff and say "I'm not kicking at my money
This is where the big misconception comes in to play. To play "Roll Out" you have to know a LOT more about pool to keep up with someone that's a champion player. This is a fact and anyone that's played it like Buddy Hall, Mike Sigel, Earl Stickland, Johnny Archer and Hopkins have will tell you the same thing. It's virtually impossible for a weaker player to out maneuver a champion player playing "Push Out" (Roll Out).
Playing One Foul you might bet lucky with your kicks or the champion player may get unlucky, with Push Out there's NO CHANCE of luck making a difference. The difference will be in the execution of the "Two Way Shots".....this is an incredible skill that has been effectively removed from the game with One Foul Rules.
This is a fact and I do speak from a considerable amount of experience. Wait til you see what happens in the Johnny Archer match where they JUST play roll out after the break. This will make a difference, and if they played "Roll Out" it would make a HUGE difference.
There's not much strategy in One Foul, however, in Two Shot Roll Out there's a tremendous amount of strategy. They are completely different games, and I'm ok with One Foul for tournaments, but in the 80s very few big money matches were played with one foul rules.
The "old school" players would scoff and say "I'm not kicking at my money, are you kidding?" They were right, if you want to prove who the best players is for sure you have to play Roll Out. This is my opinion based on playing tens of thousands of hours with both rules......it's not even close in comparison. 'The Game is my Teacher'
How so?
I kick really well, and do okay with jumping so when you push, you'll hardly put me in a terrible spot. If you do, I have no problems with giving it back and making you come with a good shot.
Eliminating one foul relieves a lot of pressure from me, because now I don't have to worry about giving you ball in hand and running out.
I guess if I were ever going to gamble with someone much better than me, I'd probably prefer playing 2 push out rules.
This is where the big misconception comes in to play. To play "Roll Out" you have to know a LOT more about pool to keep up with someone that's a champion player. This is a fact and anyone that's played it like Buddy Hall, Mike Sigel, Earl Stickland, Johnny Archer and Hopkins have will tell you the same thing. It's virtually impossible for a weaker player to out maneuver a champion player playing "Push Out" (Roll Out).
Playing One Foul you might bet lucky with your kicks or the champion player may get unlucky, with Push Out there's NO CHANCE of luck making a difference. The difference will be in the execution of the "Two Way Shots".....this is an incredible skill that has been effectively removed from the game with One Foul Rules.
This is a fact and I do speak from a considerable amount of experience. Wait til you see what happens in the Johnny Archer match where they JUST play roll out after the break. This will make a difference, and if they played "Roll Out" it would make a HUGE difference.
There's not much strategy in One Foul, however, in Two Shot Roll Out there's a tremendous amount of strategy. They are completely different games, and I'm ok with One Foul for tournaments, but in the 80s very few big money matches were played with one foul rules.
The "old school" players would scoff and say "I'm not kicking at my money, are you kidding?" They were right, if you want to prove who the best players is for sure you have to play Roll Out. This is my opinion based on playing tens of thousands of hours with both rules......it's not even close in comparison. 'The Game is my Teacher'