So, I just took a Gallup strength finder test and the results are revealing. It turns out I do NOT possess a killer instinct and I never will. It turns out that I approach our game just like I approach people. The test basically says that I enjoy interacting with people, enjoy creative thinking and problem solving, enjoy competition and enjoy being near the top of the group…BUT, here’s the key, I do not possess the drive to be the best! So, there it is, I said it. I would say that the truth hurts, but it doesn’t.
As it turns out, I really just enjoy playing the game as best as I can. I’m happy when I win, but am not crushed when I lose. I will never be a killer in the game. In fact, when I run up the score in a set (as happened last night), I almost always either cease bearing down, or try more interesting patterns or banks rather than the routine, reliable out. In other words, I tend to try to play just well enough to maintain my lead and to keep the game interesting for myself.
Some may say this is a bad thing. And it may be, from a perspective. Certainly most focus on winning, I get that. But the satisfaction I derive from our game these days is improvement, human interaction, camaraderie, exploring new patterns, etc. I’ve even tried gambling, but even that pressure doesn’t change my approach to the game and I continue to try odd ball shots and outs as the session wears on.
As Socrates advised us to know ourselves, this is what I am learning about myself and my game. I enjoy the activity, creativity and beauty of the game more than I enjoy its outcome. I enjoy my opponent more than I enjoy beating them. Turns out that scores, numbers and cash bore me.
I remain a walking contradiction.
Best,
JL (Gawd, is it Friday yet???)
As it turns out, I really just enjoy playing the game as best as I can. I’m happy when I win, but am not crushed when I lose. I will never be a killer in the game. In fact, when I run up the score in a set (as happened last night), I almost always either cease bearing down, or try more interesting patterns or banks rather than the routine, reliable out. In other words, I tend to try to play just well enough to maintain my lead and to keep the game interesting for myself.
Some may say this is a bad thing. And it may be, from a perspective. Certainly most focus on winning, I get that. But the satisfaction I derive from our game these days is improvement, human interaction, camaraderie, exploring new patterns, etc. I’ve even tried gambling, but even that pressure doesn’t change my approach to the game and I continue to try odd ball shots and outs as the session wears on.
As Socrates advised us to know ourselves, this is what I am learning about myself and my game. I enjoy the activity, creativity and beauty of the game more than I enjoy its outcome. I enjoy my opponent more than I enjoy beating them. Turns out that scores, numbers and cash bore me.
I remain a walking contradiction.
Best,
JL (Gawd, is it Friday yet???)