uwate said:Ktown I pmd you.
Sydbarret....ill do something with you on JS/DH. PM me on that. I also like SVB so nothing there but you might get others on here to do something. I can vouch for you that your action is good. You payoff via check though...you really need to get paypal man.
uwate said:TAR has alot of action matches slated for the next few weeks.
First up is Danny Harriman v John Schmidt. (May 2,3,4th)
with Danny being the dog in 14.1,
Wow, dog maybe a little strong dont you think...
poolfire said:uwate said:TAR has alot of action matches slated for the next few weeks.
First up is Danny Harriman v John Schmidt. (May 2,3,4th)
with Danny being the dog in 14.1,
Wow, dog maybe a little strong dont you think...
as in underdog...
mac1972 said:ill take mike sigel against anyone if he gets matched up
uwate said:u got action Doug.
Celtic said:I want to see that. How about Sigel vs Schmidt in a first to 500 Straight Pool match on a Diamond Pro-Am.
I cannot imagine a more interesting match, the younger supposed best straight pool player in the USA (and maybe world) against the guy who was the clear best straight pool player when he quit.
Not sure if you could find the backers for Schmidt but if enough money was upped on his end you could probably get Sigel interested enough to do it. I would guess you would need at least $50,000 to get Sigel to actually do it but the PPV should be decent for a match like that. I know I would pay $20 to watch that stream.
DeadPoked said:Did you seriously just say that John Schmidt would have trouble finding backers to play Mike Segel. That's laughable. And I doubt that Mike Segel would need at least 50K posted to play John. I would venture to guess that Mike Segel would have a lot of trouble finding enough backers to put up 50K against John Schmidt.
Last night KT mentioned that John & Mike have played 14.1 and that John Schmidt won. Mike talks so much about how great he is and he knows more than anyone that he should limit his talk to how great he was. Because of this, I think you would have a much more difficult time getting Mike in the box. His pool game can't back up his mouth and getting in the box with a true competitor would prove it. It's one thing to hype up a match against a female that's out of stroke... it's another thing to woof up action with an instroke, 20 yrs younger, champion.Celtic said:Not sure if you could find the backers for Schmidt but if enough money was upped on his end you could probably get Sigel interested enough to do it.
UrackmIcrackm said:Last night KT mentioned that John & Mike have played 14.1 and that John Schmidt won. Mike talks so much about how great he is and he knows more than anyone that he should limit his talk to how great he was. Because of this, I think you would have a much more difficult time getting Mike in the box. His pool game can't back up his mouth and getting in the box with a true competitor would prove it. It's one thing to hype up a match against a female that's out of stroke... it's another thing to woof up action with an instroke, 20 yrs younger, champion.
OK sounds like a bet to me,same deal as last time,MO within one week of match.Thanks for the action.Maybe this time i will finally book a winner,im like 0% for online wagering on pool matches.Luxury said:Alright Fast Lenny let's bet again. You've got Shmidt for $20 and you've got Frost for $20 Payment via money order after the second match is over. So one of us will win $40 or we will break even. This bet is not on until you post a response on this thread.
Good luck my friend