Drew said:
I think my original intent with this thread has been lost.
It seems to me that everybody on this forum is concerned with the state of pool. There's not enough money. There aren't any sponsors. There's no professional pool. I only wanted to point out the fact that pool is a multi-million dollar industry. Frankly, I don't care how much the APA, BCA, TAP, and VNEA leagues make. But I do care about our professional players. I care that the best players in the country are stuck below the poverty line. I care that the best players have to gamble to make a living.
There are solutions. There is money. There are even governing bodies. Why won't they help?
I love threads like these. If I understand you correctly, you're upset with APA because there isn't a decent men's pro tour?
First off, I'm not sure what a professional tour has to do with an amateur pool league, but I'll respectfully attempt to give you my opinion on the matter.
The APA is very active in sponsoring the WPBA women's pro billiard tour. It's been a long and lasting relationship and it's been a great relationship. I have attended many WPBA functions over the years and the ladies understand the importance of sponsorship. They understand where their bread is buttered. On and off the greens, they represent nothing but the utmost class. They have elevated billiards to a whole new level.
The men's circuit? Not so much. The APA was founded by two long time touring professional billiard players, Terry Bell and Larry Hubbart. Why do they support the women's tour and not a men's tour? Probably because the men can't get their act together. I'd like nothing more than to see a men's tour that was at one point sponsored by APA and many other big sponsors. But, when you have a couple of guys behaving like 3 year olds, a few more disrespecting the sponsors and a couple others openly gambling and causing other kinds of mischief, it's hard to justify doing them any favors.
The men's pro tour used to have Camel as a sponsor. Camel eventually had to go away due to tobacco/advertising legislation, but Camel was dropping the men's tour anyway. I went to Vegas when Camel and APA Nationals were doing side by side events. I was in an elevator with 2 high ranking Camel representatives and 3 pro players. The pro players didn't know who they were in the elevator with, but they were all proudly displaying their non RJ Reynolds tobacco products for the sponsors to see. Use an empty Camel pack to put your Marlboro's in. Switch to Camel just for the event, I don't care. Just don't slap your sponsor in the face right in front of their face. I still smoke Camel's to this day because of Camel's sponsorship with APA. I switched from Marlboro. When we had Bud Light as a sponsor, that's what I drank. It's such a small sacrifice to make for such an impactful relationship.
Camel wasn't just a sponsor of that tour, either. They were supporting that tour. Now, I'm not saying all of the pro players behaved negatively. But, it only takes a few to spoil the whole bunch. One of the pool players I admire the most (excluding Alison Fisher, who defines class) is Johnny Archer. He has always been the very definition of class. There aren't enough out there like him, unfortunately. Many walk around with the attitude that everyone owes them something. Until they start behaving in a manner that would attract big time sponsors, I'm afraid nothing's going to change.
I'd also like to express my gratitude to Scott Lee, Jude and a few other posters in this thread that acknowledged that APA is a business. Unless you have been in business and recognize all the expenses involved in running a business, it's probably not a good idea to attempt to create your own formula to determine how much you think APA is making.
I could sit here and poke so many holes in your formula that it would make your head spin. Right off the bat, I'd point out that a very large percentage of that annual membership pays a $10 renewal fee rather than the full $20 annual membership. Anyone who joined APA after August 15th of the previous year is entitled to a prorated membership fee the following year. So, just in membership fees collected alone, you're already way off course.
There are over 250 APA LO's across North America. Each pays back a portion of the fees collected to their local membership in the form of awards like trophies, Vegas trips and prize money. I can assure you that when you combine all of those APA leagues together and the amount that is returned to the APA membership, you are talking millions upon millions of dollars being paid back on the local level.
As others have stated, APA is a business. If you don't make money, you don't stay in business. So, it doesn't make a lot of sense to get upset with someone for trying to make a living running a business. The beauty of this business (at least in the eyes of the consumer) is that you can get a return on your investment. I have NEVER been given a trophy or a cash prize after paying to see a movie in a movie theater. Instead, they want me to pay $20.00 for a stale bucket of popcorn and watered down soda. What do I get for frequenting the same restaraunt? Nothing. Pool leagues do reward teams for your $6.00 weekly investment. That's pretty cool.
APA is not pocketing as much cash as you imply, and it's not even close. If you want to get into an industry that makes that kind of money, try Exxon or Mobil. They're sticking it to us all. Why? Because they can.
I've had a few of my own APA league members attempt to figure out how much I earn for a living. It's usually a very poor attempt, because they really don't know everything involved with running a business. I usually shut them up pretty quickly when I tell them that my postage bill last month alone was more than $1000.00.
APA is a great business to be in. I won't lie. You can make a decent living running pool leagues, but it's very hard work. And sometimes this job can be one big pain in my ass. Especially when I have some junior entrepreneur, such as yourself, attempting to determine whether I make too much money using very fuzzy math. But, those are few and far between, really. Most of the league members enjoy the league and respect the hard work and effort we put into running the league they enjoy.
Now, I'm not opposed to seeing a relationship someday between the men's tour and APA. But, at this juncture all I would see is APA throwing money at a lost cause, and that's a horrible investment. A sponsor doesn't throw money at lost causes. They expect to see a return on their investment. I'm also sorry to see a whole generation of great pool players never get the chance to actually make a decent living doing what they do best. But, something has to change for the better before big sponsors start knocking on their door.
Now that I've said that, I'd like to add that this is my opinion and not necessarily the opinions of the APA National Office.