I have never taken a shot with a low deflection shaft and have been considering trying one. My issue is if it isn't broken should I fix it?
Dealing with squirt is a tradeoff:I have never taken a shot with a low deflection shaft and have been considering trying one. My issue is if it isn't broken should I fix it?
The following make ld shafts that are not laminated, McDermott, poison, mezz, universal and more I can't think of right now.If it's not laminated, I'd say yes. I've never cared for laminated shafts and my ld shafts are not laminated. You'd have to find one made by a cue maker as I don't think there are any commercial ones that are not laminated.
If you are satisfied with your game I say forget about LD shafts.I have never taken a shot with a low deflection shaft and have been considering trying one. My issue is if it isn't broken should I fix it?
The following make ld shafts that are not laminated, McDermott, poison, mezz, universal and more I can't think of right now.
For convenience, here are the direct links to the pertinent info:Dealing with squirt is a tradeoff:
...low squirt cue = more precise / less automatic
...high squirt cue = less precise / more automatic
So one way to figure whether low squirt is worth trying is to think about whether precision (low squirt & "manual" english) or ease of use (high squirt & BHE) is more important.
Dr. Dave's Pool FAQ explains all the pros and cons, as usual.
I assume you mean because swerve is a bigger factor in those shots and swerve is harder to estimate.Assuming LD shafts are suitable for the kid starting out is foolish.
If anything, these shafts require more focus and concentration
on the low speed shots.