Since when did it become a bad thing in the pool world to have to compensate for English?
A: After the invention of low deflection shafts.
I mean.....shaft makers even have graphs to "prove" that theirs is just a tad bit less deflection than the competitors.
Oh, and if you put an ultra hard tip and make the shaft so thin that it feels like a needle you just might get 1/1000th of an inch less deflection, long as you hit the ball at break speed and have a 30' pool table.
Manufacturers have tried hard to convince the pool world that we need this and that these are somehow "better" shafts.
This is total bs.
But they have succeeded because of the proven marketing fact that we, the consumers, are always more than happy to spend money on anything we thing can improve us. No matter what the field is. Pool, poker, bridge, chess, diet, abs, playing guitar.......
Since there is no shaft where you do not have to compensate anyway, no such thing as zero deflection, I believe one may as well go with good crisp feel and not that numbed up feel that LD's give.
This is what I choose, and I have tried all the top LD shafts out there.
I mean this literally.
After years of experimenting I have truly come a full circle.
FOR ME the shaft I can play a decent game with is a 314-2 shaft, still have that one, but this shaft is still a joke compared to a solid maple shaft.
I was never happier or played a better game than when after years of trying LD's that I went back to the shaft that came with my 97 Richard Black cue that I play so much.
Last one I tried, just a month ago - on that same cue - was an OB + Classic.
LD's just don't do it for me.
And to the sensitive fragile minded AZers.
YES.......all this is just my opinion and should mean nothing to anyone.
Just sharing my experience and what works for me.