MR, 9 on spot, 4" x 4" break box, must break hard... works. It worked too good the MC they used. Johnnuy
This argument about the Magic Rack seems odd to me. Let's cover the basics.
1) The proclaimed IDEAL situation when racking is that all balls touch each other.
2) If the Magic rack achieves this objective then the IDEAL has been achieved.
3) If the IDEAL has been achieved what's the problem?
People complaining about a properly formed rack amazes me. ...
I for one am sick and tired of watching a match and having five minute racking arguments happening on every rack.
MR, 9 on spot, 4" x 4" break box, must break hard... works. It worked too good the MC they used. Johnnuy
Placing the 2-ball in the back will make it a bit more unpredictable for the pattern rackers. .
Then let the decision come down to this....
China open played on Chinese pool tables with made-in-China magic rack.....
US Open should be played on American diamond tables with made-in-USA AccuRack from Outsville
On a side note, the material that the AccuRack is made out of is more similar to the cloth than the plastic magic rack. I've been rewatching the AccuStats 8 ball invitational tournament on DVD, and marveling at the zero clusters given by the rack and the unchanged paths of balls slow rolling over the template after the break. The Accu Rack is definitely more advanced IMO
The material choice and the geometry of the cueouts pretty much lock the object balls into specific paths on the magic rack... tehy tried Barry's plan at Mosconi a few years ago and had to abandon it because of all the breaks that didn't meet the head string requirment becuase balls were locked into kisses regardless of the speed... Will seriously be lobbying on this one because we do not have that issue.....
I can promise you there will be dry breaks if they use the Accu-Rack and not the Magic Rack... You miss hit the break or over power it or under power it it the balls behave properly.....
The U.S. Open is not the Shane Van Boening show, in spite of what some might think, and rightfully should not take his streak into consideration when deciding on the format.
Amazes me that people still think like this, in 2015. The Accu-Rack is the better product, and that should be the only consideration, regardless where it was made.
Too big a foot print when left on the table, and yes I bought one to compare
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Will you have a table with your rack setup at SBE to compare? I'm a MR user and would like to see how yours works if there are differences. Plus I want to stop by and say thanks for making the KiTech tips, I love mine and it's turned into my go-to recommendation for a tip.