It must have been the camera angle, but watching from home, it looked like the 6 straight in the side was very makable, instead of playing the 6 carom off the 7 that he missed.
So I was thinking the same thing. In one of his last matches leading up to the final, I swear he played a ball in the side a thousand miles an hour that no one saw coming at an even tougher angle. This one he could have floated in at any speed and had position really. I know it was thin for a guy like me, but they seem to be a strength of his.
I really think the clock affected him with a couple of his decisions. You could see him really battling it the last few racks. In particular, I think the 2nd to last game where he played the loose safe that cost him, that he originally planned to shoot. I think he was trying to decide exactly how he wanted to shoot it and ran out of time. Then in the last game, he played that stop shot leaving him super long. Not saying it was the wrong shot, but he seemed very rushed and I think he may have been able to play the same shot, but stun down a couple more inches getting him off the rail a bit more and still been in line. If he could have done that, he would have had more options. Then on the shot he missed at the end, I think he needed a bit more time to look at the side, the carom, and really feel them out. It seemed he felt rushed, saw the finish line, and blasted it. IDK, who knows, maybe with all those shots he would have played them all the same way with no clock, but I would bet against that.
I can only imagine, so much pressure, in the final, and he's probably played in the least amount of tourneys with a shot clock, compared to the rest of the top guys. With that being said, I love the shot clock. It makes viewing so much better and I like watching the players have to make quick decisions, especially with tricky racks.