People who don't understand what "mint condition" means ought not to use the term. By any definition, "mint condition" implies that the item being described is in absolutely perfect condition. When applied to a cue, it should mean that the cue shows no signs of being used AND is in perfect condition overall. I believe the standard is even higher than "like new" because a "new" cue may have some minor flaws in workmanship but still be "new" per se.
Recently, I had a transaction with a fellow AZer who made the following comment in one of his original PMs ....
"......... I was wondering if you'd take a trade plus cash. I have a mint condition [MAKE] fancy sneaky with 1 shaft with a brand new tip."
We did the deal here is the result. The butt itself is indeed pretty close to mint condition, but the shaft has a fair amount of blueing.
If you read the statement again, you find that it appears to be constructed deliberately, maybe implying that the word "mint" applies to the butt only, so I suppose one could argue that point, but that would be a stretch at the very least.
I'm ultimately ok with the deal and not here to litigate in front of the "AZ Court". As it turns out, there appears to be a small manufacturer defect in the new cue as well that I sent him so that is being resolved as well. That is not the point of this post.
I feel that terms like "mint" and "like new" should imply exactly what they are supposed to and inspire a level of confidence that other terms do not. Ultimately, using percentages (95% condition, 90% condition, 85% condition, etc), along with a description, offers a much better feel for the actual condition of a cue.
Recently, I had a transaction with a fellow AZer who made the following comment in one of his original PMs ....
"......... I was wondering if you'd take a trade plus cash. I have a mint condition [MAKE] fancy sneaky with 1 shaft with a brand new tip."
We did the deal here is the result. The butt itself is indeed pretty close to mint condition, but the shaft has a fair amount of blueing.
If you read the statement again, you find that it appears to be constructed deliberately, maybe implying that the word "mint" applies to the butt only, so I suppose one could argue that point, but that would be a stretch at the very least.

I'm ultimately ok with the deal and not here to litigate in front of the "AZ Court". As it turns out, there appears to be a small manufacturer defect in the new cue as well that I sent him so that is being resolved as well. That is not the point of this post.
I feel that terms like "mint" and "like new" should imply exactly what they are supposed to and inspire a level of confidence that other terms do not. Ultimately, using percentages (95% condition, 90% condition, 85% condition, etc), along with a description, offers a much better feel for the actual condition of a cue.