GUYS, THE REPELLANT DIDN’T WORK. HELP!!You're not safe. The peppermint oil and cinnamon oil goes great on mashed potatoes and in coffee.I love the stuff.
Try it. Otherwise, it's not worth a DAM! Nor is DAM worth anything on its own.And always remember...stay centered
to keep your edge on everything.
Basically sounds like a trial and error aiming system learned and honed in from lots of practice. Your brain / memory has recorded data from pocketed shots / overcuts and undercuts.When I approach a shot I look where I need to hit the object ball and how the impact affects the cue ball. I bend down look, stroke it a few times and shoot.
No looking at ghost ball or lines or any other principle applied.
I call it the guessing system but what system would this be? I don't use any other principles except to see where I need to hit and hit it.
CG gets you the ghost ball although not in terms of an apparition. It supplies the actual base of the ghost ball along with other stable references. I call it socketing the cue ball.I call bs...
If you look at the object ball and the pocket at any point, then you've instinctively developed a path (line) you want the ob to follow. Just because you haven't envisioned an imaginary red line to the pocket, doesn't mean you haven't developed that line (path) in which you want to the ob to follow.
I also think everyone is kidding themselves if they claim that don't envision a 'ghost ball' contact before pulling the trigger. You may not adhere to the ghost ball methodology, but you still are directing the CB toward the OB. Pretending that you don't imagine how the CB will strike the OB before pulling the trigger is either comical or a glaring error.
I know there are systems out there that do not rely on the above, but that's doesn't mean you don't do those things in happenstance.
Flame on
Is there an instructor that specialises in teaching this technique?i am not garczar but here you go......
I use a mechanical drawing trick which I have freely divulged here but I'll STFU if that's too close to your private reserve.I use a sophisticated system developed before the internet existed, The P&H System. With no mentor and no internet to confuse me I was left with the ghost ball theory some advocated but didn't work all that well. Finally I took a few months of trial and error to be able to visualize the back side of the cue ball I couldn't see hitting the object ball.
"Equal opposites" is much the same but doesn't seem to delve into the occult quite as deeply as my aiming system. I tried to flesh out the back side of the cue ball in my mind's eye. When I would miss a shot in practice I would make guesses and new attempts until I had the portion of the cue ball involved in contact on that shot right then resume practice until I missed another shot due to aiming error. "Lather, rinse, and repeat". If it seems tedious that is because it was. Bit by bit I was completing the surface of the cue ball I couldn't see though. This went on for months and hundreds of hours. Finally I could see the entire blind side of the cue ball accurately in my mind's eye.
I wasn't ready to reveal my aiming secret to the world so when asked about aiming I always replied that I used the P&H method. I have found Poke and Hope to be as effective as any other aiming system.
Hu
Ah yes but that can apply to anything you have taught yourself to see.I think there might be. I recently saw Ralph Ekhart, don't remember where, pretty sure it was here. He says "picture the shot, make it happen". Alah, Jack Nicklaus.
I use a mechanical drawing trick which I have freely divulged here but I'll STFU if that's too close to your private reserve.
Ah yes but that can apply to anything you have taught yourself to see.
Actually it's an equatorial ellipse.What I did involved a lot of work, something most pool players have a severe adverse reaction to. I could put it on billboards and it wouldn't matter.
As a fellow mechanical draftsman long retired I suspect that you may be thinking about parallel lines. Using a straight edge, even a pool stick is close enough, it is possible to shift a line to another location much like we did with two triangles. Not with the exact precision of the triangles but closely enough.
Unless I am being tongue in cheek I don't claim title to any method. If I consider something confidential, it is somebody else's secret I have promised not to disclose. I used to think it hilarious all the secrets circle track racers thought they held. Somebody would swear me to secrecy then tell me something that was common knowledge, often recently published in books or magazines.
One of my better "secrets" with cars was published in one of the big newsstand magazines. It didn't matter, you had to be willing to risk an engine to learn it worked. Somebody bought one of my engines after I had sold it and it passed through several hands. They decided to freshen it up. After racing with no issues for several seasons the engine came apart running in their shop at a fast idle. Burned up the rod bearings.
If one person has a secret it is a secret. Two people, maybe but you are on shaky ground. Three people share a secret and you might as well tell it to the world!
Hu
The only downside to this system is that it takes most people about 20 years to get somewhat proficient at it.When I approach a shot I look where I need to hit the object ball and how the impact affects the cue ball. I bend down look, stroke it a few times and shoot.
No looking at ghost ball or lines or any other principle applied.
I call it the guessing system but what system would this be? I don't use any other principles except to see where I need to hit and hit it.
Rote?When I approach a shot I look where I need to hit the object ball and how the impact affects the cue ball. I bend down look, stroke it a few times and shoot.
No looking at ghost ball or lines or any other principle applied.
I call it the guessing system but what system would this be? I don't use any other principles except to see where I need to hit and hit it.
What is "feel" specifically? Unsure? Doubt? What do I do now? Where and how do I do it?It's often called aiming "by feel" - you learn through practice to recognize the CB/OB picture needed for the shot. All aiming, with or without a system, includes some "feel".
Maybe a straight shot (center to center) - even a half ball shot (center to edge) takes some feel to know when it’s the right shot.Are there any shots on the table (not hangers on the edge of the pocket) that don't require any feel?
this sounds similar to joe tuckers aiming by the numbersI use a sophisticated system developed before the internet existed, The P&H System. With no mentor and no internet to confuse me I was left with the ghost ball theory some advocated but didn't work all that well. Finally I took a few months of trial and error to be able to visualize the back side of the cue ball I couldn't see hitting the object ball.
"Equal opposites" is much the same but doesn't seem to delve into the occult quite as deeply as my aiming system. I tried to flesh out the back side of the cue ball in my mind's eye. When I would miss a shot in practice I would make guesses and new attempts until I had the portion of the cue ball involved in contact on that shot right then resume practice until I missed another shot due to aiming error. "Lather, rinse, and repeat". If it seems tedious that is because it was. Bit by bit I was completing the surface of the cue ball I couldn't see though. This went on for months and hundreds of hours. Finally I could see the entire blind side of the cue ball accurately in my mind's eye.
I wasn't ready to reveal my aiming secret to the world so when asked about aiming I always replied that I used the P&H method. I have found Poke and Hope to be as effective as any other aiming system.
Hu
With a straight shot, there's no "maybe" about it. If a player can't see that CCB lined up to COB to center pocket is dead on...they need to take up another game or sport.Maybe a straight shot (center to center) - even a half ball shot (center to edge) takes some feel to know when it’s the right shot.
With a straight shot, there's no "maybe" about it. If a player can't see that CCB lined up to COB to center pocket is dead on...they need to take up another game or sport.
I think the other shot would be an extreme eighty some degree shot where the CB edge has to skin the OB edge. There is no doubt or feel about it. The aim/alignment/stroke all have to be dead on or it will be missed.
So, let's talk contact points. I've used that for more years than anything else as you do. Simple to find on the OB. Stand behind
the OB in a straight line to the pocket (like the dead straight in shot)...keep your eye on it while going back behind the CB and line up the equal and opposite spot on the CB...and make the stroke. Is that about the same way you see it?
Is there "feel" in doing that? If so, where and why?