Drew said:
Out of curiosity...
This thread circulates once every few months. Edward Norton is always the actor of choice....Do you guys realize how much it costs to get Norton? He got paid 8 million for Death to Smoochie. That was 6 years ago. The last few movies he's done, he has also co-produced. To top it off, you guys are talking about Tom Cruise, Matt Damon, etc...These are not cheap actors. What studio is going to fund a $100M project about pool?
Well Fox, I think, did do this in the past with The Color of Money. That was a big budget major motion picture with huge stars of the time: Scorsese (Directing), Newman, Cruise, Turturo, Shaver, Mastrantonio, and Whittaker.
The film budget was $10 Million. Other films that had a $10 Million budget in the 80's were: King Kong Lives, Stripes, and Rumble Fish.
According to
Measuring Worth - Relative Value of US Dollars at best 1986's $10million is worth $31million today.
Edit: That $10million figure was only for the film production. Touchstone Pictures (distributor) no doubt spent many, many more millions to get it in theaters and to get you and I to go see it!
Drew said:
One more thing
Why is it always the responsibility of Fox or Paramount to come out with this fantastic pool movie? I believe several regular posters have written much about the subject of pool. One even has a script written and ready to go. Instead of sitting around talking about what the major studios need to do, why not film it by ourselves. I happen to know there are script writers, video editors, photographers, and investors who post regularly on this site and are very devoted to the game of pool...We even have a celebrity with, I assume, plenty of connections in the film and tv industries.
The reason the responsibility falls on the major studios is the bottom line, MONEY!!!
Even a shi* movie with money behind it makes money. Notice that we all know who Adam Sandler is and he keeps making movies - they are all dog shi* for movies. It's because he has $$$ behind him. By now, we are all so saturated and marketed to, that we think he's good (yeah Happy Gilmore is kinda funny!)
Anyway, back to the point. The major outfits can advertise, market, and get the film shown (worldwide) to have an impact. A great (the best ever) movie that does not have the $$$ and networks behind them, at best will only be seen in art house theatres and hardly anyone will have heard of them.