Just wondering if you guys have seen this,nice to see the Professor playing some great pool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66SL4MSDrH8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66SL4MSDrH8&feature=related
Fast Lenny said:Just wondering if you guys have seen this,nice to see the Professor playing some great pool.![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66SL4MSDrH8&feature=related
LOL,he did shoot great pool obviously to get to the finals even though when he got to the hill he might have made some errors.av84fun said:Thanks for the blast from the past...but were you being sarcastic about
Grady playing great pool?
He had 4 shots in the two racks...made 1, dogged 1 and played 2 poor safeties.
No disrespect intended. I'm just sayin'.
(-:
Jim
RunoutalloverU said:Im not sure when billiard world championships started, but it wasn't in 1988
grady would be annilihated by today's stars even in his prime.
But thanks for the post, its interesting to go back in time, and see what they considered world class pool.
Grady you obviously shot great pool to get to the finals in that field,this video is to show people who have doubts that you were playing at the top level of the Pro Tour.I cant even imagine what it was like to be in the finals of an event like that and get to the hill before Nick did,an inch here or there on one of your safeties and you would have been Champion.I posted this video to commend you for your fine shooting and not to bash you because you lost in the finals of this match,its more then 99.9% of us on the forum will ever accomplish in pool.Grady said:This a perfect example why I don't post anymore on AZ. I could tell you everything about that tournament, including facts unknown to the general public. Why get picked apart by idiots? It just isn't worth it.
To those of you who would enjoy finding out interesting things about that event or other questions, ask me on Onepocket.org .
Grady played nearly flawless for the rest of the TV event, beating Kim Davenport in the quarters, absolutely crushing Jimmy Mataya in the semis, and then bringing the finals to a climactic hill-hill classic!!!av84fun said:Thanks for the blast from the past...but were you being sarcastic about
Grady playing great pool?
He had 4 shots in the two racks...made 1, dogged 1 and played 2 poor safeties.
No disrespect intended. I'm just sayin'.
(-:
Jim
I've noticed aswell...and alot of other non-professional players...jimmy-leggs said:I don't blame you Grady, for pulling the plug on this forum after remarks like that.When I first came on this forum I was amazed the amount of professionals that posted on here, BUT where are they now?
Terry Ardeno said:RunoutalloverU,
You couldn't be more wrong. Grady not only played at a world class level, he WON the World One Pocket Championship 4 different times, over the likes of Mike Sigel, Buddy Hall, Danny DiLiberto, Jim Rempe, Larry Johnson, Ed Kelly, Larry Lisciotti, Nick Varner, Allen Hopkins, etc. So, according to your gauge, what does that make all these guys he BEAT to win the title(s)? Chumps?
Also, apparently you didn't know that he also played 9 Ball at a world class level. Anybody that finishes 2nd in World 9 Ball Championship, believe it or not, really does know how to play.
Grady is universally hailed by his peers as being an elite player in 14.1. His high run is 326! Have you ever seen ANY of his 14.1 matches on Accu-Stats where he beats other world class 14.1 players?
There's a reason why he's in the Onepocket HOF with guys like Ronnie Allen
and Jack Breit.
So now, Grady's going to stay away from here for who knows how long.
Hey, RunoutalloverU, how about YOU making a series of videos on kicking and saftey play?
Maybe Pat Fleming could hire YOU to do some commentary? Or are you all booked up doing commentary with T.A.R. and the IPT?
Here's looking forward to you keeping us all enlightened!
RunoutalloverU said:Ok ill agree. He is a great United States Champion. But now Terry, pool is ACTUALLY a world sport. With people from all over the WORLD that play. You can't have a sport where its all US playes, and two philipino guys, and call it a world championship. Im not sure how much more obvious or clear the situation has changed from then to now can be.
StevenPWaldon said:Perhaps, but the Accu-stat ratings from pros twenty years ago are just as high as current players. Look through Mike Sigel's old scores, many above .920, .930, .940+. You can talk semantics about what constitutes a World Championship, but regardless Grady deserved a spot in the finals of that tournament. In his prime he was a champion. At any game. Period.
RunoutalloverU said:I agree, good point. But then again, that doesn't disagree with anything ive ever thought or said. Sigel is on a different level. Sigel could have played with and beat in his prime any kid today from any asain country. Or any other country for that matter. I think strickland is in that category as well. Yes, they all played with each other and beat each other, i.e. grady, varner etc.... But so what? Jordan probably got outplayed once or twice too. But we don't know who they are. Because its about greatness over a long period of time, not just a couple of years or so.