No Deflection
- Thread starter nodeflection
- Start date
Have you tried your technique on a tighter gambling table? That is where I find the men get separated from the boys.
It would depend on the way you work the cue. If I plan to prolong the time on the ball Im looking for more of a solid feel with a lot of force backing it up. The CB is gaining "extra" speed due to increased time on the ball. You have to plan the shot that way and be ready or it won't work, it has to do with reflexes. Grip pressure doesn't matter, you could squeeze it as hard as you want.
Given that I am still ironing out the details it would be prudent to jump up and bet the farm. I like to play on 4 1/8 pockets or smaller, the more gaffy tight the table is, the better. What if I were female how would I prove myself to such a stranger?
Someday, maybe a titanium cue shaft.
Howard Vickery used t o break with a titanium shaft.....it was NG
I need you to witness it to know I achieved it?
Maybe* things will happen sooner than later.
Last edited:
Im saying they all will be converted to NO deflection shafts.
Yeah, well, like I said, good luck with that. I'll look forward to the video.
pj
chgo
And I have a compression software that will speed up the internet 1000X faster.
You have a vaporware.
Only YOU claim such a product.
You have no name or product.
Zero deflection was claimed by Meucci decades ago and was debunked.
If you have such a product but you are here "investigating ", means you have no such product.
I'd be shocked if you even have a lathe and a taper machine.
Meaning you have NO proof.
I never mentioned I make cues/shafts. The techniques will eliminate the deflection.
I think it can be done....on an electronic game.
I think it can be done.........on a real pool table.
At one range (speed and distance)you could aim like center ball...
...change the range, you must change the aim...hell, just change the cloth...
Like Joey said, Meucci claimed zero-deflection over 30 years ago....
...but it was for one shot.
The guy who showed me, a HOFer, I told him to try it on a directional nap cloth...shooting
with and against the nap...he saw what I meant right away.
A llot of cues, trying to achieve zero deflection, end up with a massé problem.
At one range (speed and distance)you could aim like center ball...
...change the range, you must change the aim...hell, just change the cloth...
Like Joey said, Meucci claimed zero-deflection over 30 years ago....
...but it was for one shot.
The guy who showed me, a HOFer, I told him to try it on a directional nap cloth...shooting
with and against the nap...he saw what I meant right away.
A llot of cues, trying to achieve zero deflection, end up with a massé problem.
I agree with the masse statement. I do have a method for applying side spin that does not masse over a long distance or throw the object ball. I can actually drag the object ball with outside English. Definitely can't do that on an electronic table (unless the physics engine is that good).
Last edited:
After going thru 4 pages I must say... well played
I am not saying that because you are a 600 Fargo that I have a better handle on the laws of physics.
My investigation is complete. Thanks for the replies guys.
Thank you.