Official Scores for the 2007 DMMHT

EQUIPMENT: 8 foot Olhausen, (at the back) 4 1/8" corner pockets, 4 3/4" side pockets.

Session #1 = 90 ; 5,10,14,10,16,5,3,4,19,7
Session #2 = 73 ; 12,2,4,8,9,20,9,8,0,1 ,rats
Session #3 = 64 ; 3,4,5,4,2,3,7,10,10,16 ,holy crap
Session #4 =
Session #5 =
AVG. =
TOTAL =

My goal is 100 avg., improving from my 80 last year.
Foolonthehill said:
Hello all. As you can see, this is my first post here. Been lurking for a while. ..
Glad to have you, the only shame is in not playing along with us!!
 
Last edited:
EQUIPMENT: 8 foot Canon, Corner pockets: 4.5 in the front, 4.0 in the back. 5.0 side pockets
Mcdermott low end cue. Measles cue ball

Session #1 = 16-14-4-12-9-18-10-2-20-14=119
Session #2 = 16-9-20-16-10-12-0-9-12-18=122
Session #3 = 12-8-5-2-18-10-14-12-3-14=98
Session #4 = 19-20-20-14-20-3-14-16-2-7=135 (Bad finish but I'll take it)
Session #5 = 2-8-16-3-20-20-9-12-10-10=110
AVG. = 116.8
TOTAL = 584

I just thought I'd shoot it again for the heck of it. The Mcdermott is OK if you like playing with wet noodles.
 
Last edited:
Hal said:
EQUIPMENT: 8 foot Canon, Corner pockets: 4.5 in the front, 4.0 in the back. 5.0 side pockets
Mcdermott low end cue. Measles cue ball

Session #1 = 16-14-4-12-9-18-10-2-20-14=119
Session #2 = 16-9-20-16-10-12-0-9-12-18=122
Session #3 =
Session #4 =
Session #5 =
AVG. = 120.5
TOTAL = 241

TWEEEEEEEEEEET ! We may have an infraction here. In post #3 you are shooting with a Dufferin cue, now you are using a low end McDermott ? This is highly suspicious ... we must nip this in the bud ... next you'll be out there trying to break records with a cuetech or one of those titanium cues I've been eyeing up at Walmart ... so what happened, did you Earl the Dufferin and think that entitled you to a do-over or what ?

Dave

PS Good on ya Hal, this is good practice !
 
Hal said:
EQUIPMENT: 8 foot Canon, Corner pockets: 4.5 in the front, 4.0 in the back. 5.0 side pockets
Mcdermott low end cue. Measles cue ball

Session #1 = 16-14-4-12-9-18-10-2-20-14=119
Session #2 = 16-9-20-16-10-12-0-9-12-18=122
Session #3 =
Session #4 =
Session #5 =
AVG. = 120.5
TOTAL = 241

Hal, did you develop a multiple personality? If so, how do we know which Hal is posting scores. Enquiring minds want to know.
 
I just thought I'd play again for the heck of it. When my new Phillippi arrives, I might even do it again. If I play each rack slow and take my time, I have no doubt that I can average near 600. My problem is that I play fast and simply miss shots.

Even when I play slow it's probably not slow enough. A session takes me a little less than an hour. How does this compare with everyone else?
 
Hal said:
I just thought I'd play again for the heck of it. When my new Phillippi arrives, I might even do it again. If I play each rack slow and take my time, I have no doubt that I can average near 600. My problem is that I play fast and simply miss shots.

Even when I play slow it's probably not slow enough. A session takes me a little less than an hour. How does this compare with everyone else?
I normally play fast as well, sometimes really fast. For the DM I took alot of time on each shot, even though I was playing a loose table.
What Im surprised about is all the perfect rack scores posted in this thread...... even when there is talk of misses..... :confused:
Chuck
 
Hal said:
Even when I play slow it's probably not slow enough. A session takes me a little less than an hour. How does this compare with everyone else?

Since I'm lucky to make four or five balls a rack, I can play this out quite a bit faster....mixed blessing though. :o
 
Time To Get R Done...

Isn't it time to finsih this thing?

Post your final scores soon and I'll compile them and post the recap in a seperate thread.

I'll do that Friday, so hurry up if you need to shoot some.

OK?

Jeff Livingston
 
chefjeff said:
Isn't it time to finsih this thing?

Post your final scores soon and I'll compile them and post the recap in a seperate thread.

I'll do that Friday, so hurry up if you need to shoot some.

OK?

Jeff Livingston
Jeff,
I think we've said that players have until after DCC; so you may want to wait until Monday to compile. Thanks for the help.
 
Williebetmore said:
Jeff,
I think we've said that players have until after DCC; so you may want to wait until Monday to compile. Thanks for the help.

10-4 back door, put the pedal to the metal, what ya waitin' for? Hammer down like you got wings, pebbles in your wheels, goin' ding ding ding...

I'll wait for those havin' so much fun in Louisville. You bastards!;)

Jeff Livingston
 
Time to put this to rest and post the scores for another year? Did Breakup do his sessions during DCC? Will the Green Hornet return for a rematch against Batman and Robin, stay tuned for this and other entertainment.:rolleyes:
 
Do I have until tomorrow? League party at Amsterdam Billiards tonight and there is no way I could focus on a session of Q-Skills.

Willie, you'll be proud of me for knowing that I joined the straight pool league this season. I'm getting more and more infatuated with the game at a worryingly fast pace.
 
challange scores

8ft brunswick 5" corners 5.5 sides. mcdermot cue.

1) 10+8+14+9+14+10+12+3+12+20 =112

2) 20+16+14+7+3+14+20+14+20+12=140

3) 9+4+18+13+20+10+18+14+10+12=128

4) 20+5+12+10+15+20+5+16+20+16=139

5) 10+18+20+3+20+4+2+9+20+20=126


total =645/5= 129
 
Hal said:
I just thought I'd play again for the heck of it. When my new Phillippi arrives, I might even do it again. If I play each rack slow and take my time, I have no doubt that I can average near 600. My problem is that I play fast and simply miss shots.

Even when I play slow it's probably not slow enough. A session takes me a little less than an hour. How does this compare with everyone else?
Hal after my first year of this Challenge i simply fell in love with the game and use it as a daily practice. I love to do drills and try to perfect them and this game is a great challenge to put out all 20's and have yet to do it. I find that a session take me about an hour myself a little bit longer is a great session for me as i find myself really looking and determining my layout of the table to get a 20.
 
I think I did it wrong. I didn't separate it in 5 sessions of 10 racks. I did in one session of 50 racks:eek: now wonder why it took 3 hours.

score was 481.
 
Better late than never!

Somehow this whole thing escaped my notice when it was going on, but the recent "rate my game" thread has aroused my interest. I wonder if WBM will accept this as the first reported score for the 2008 DCC?

Anyway,

EQUIPMENT: 8 ft., 4 5/8 corners, 4 3/4 sides, Simonis 860, Red Circle cue ball

Session #1 =178
Session #2 =
Session #3 =
Session #4 =
Session #5 =
AVG. =
TOTAL =
 
VIProfessor said:
I wonder if WBM will accept this as the first reported score for the 2008 DCC?

Anyway,

EQUIPMENT: 8 ft., 4 5/8 corners, 4 3/4 sides, Simonis 860, Red Circle cue ball

Session #1 =178
Session #2 =
Session #3 =
Session #4 =
Session #5 =
AVG. =
TOTAL =
VIP,
No problem. You are definitely the frontrunner at this point.
 
Williebetmore said:
VIP,
No problem. You are definitely the frontrunner at this point.

Getting close to time to start catching up with the old professor, isn't it ? No ? OK, I'll wait till October, but then I'm starting to practice and save my empty beer bottles for refunds so I can afford to level the table .... excuse me now, I have to go drink :)

Dave
 
Back
Top