It's Adam, not Adams .
Looks like a full-splice Adam cue. Might even be Brazilian rosewood points/handle.
In pretty bad shape though .
Is it straight ?
It's Adam, not Adams .
Looks like a full-splice Adam cue. Might even be Brazilian rosewood points/handle.
In pretty bad shape though .
Is it straight ?
What does it matter if it's a full splice or not?
No cue can yield any difference at all in any manner.
At least that is what some in other threads are saying.
Is it straight ?
What does it matter if it's a full splice or not?
No cue can yield any difference at all in any manner.
At least that is what some in other threads are saying.
I'm guessing this cue is a very early Adam design, probably from the 1960's. It may have sold for $25-30 then. Cleaned up and straight and it may bring anywhere from one to two hundred today.
I'm guessing this cue is a very early Adam design, probably from the 1960's. It may have sold for $25-30 then. Cleaned up and straight and it may bring anywhere from one to two hundred today.
Im am surprised it would sell so low, I love old cues and would probably pay $200 as is.
Thank you both for the input. Doesn't sound like it's worth refinishing.
Some are able to appreciate the distinction between the object and the function. Lost on others apparently.
Thank you kindly.
I recognize, understand, & appreciate BOTH.
Then again, perhaps you are not such a really new member. Perhaps time will tell.
And yet don't seem to be able to determine when people are talking about one and not the other. No one claiming that cues act the same, is saying that they look alike, that is just your strawman.
If it will help you with your innuendo, I started posting on pool forums in 1997.
Thank you kindly.