JAM: I gave you neg rep based on your replies to this post, which was corvette1340's FIRST post in this thread. Not one word was directed to you, and he didn't say anything bad at all, imo.
corvette1340 said:
Why in the world can this guy that supposedly owns a business and had a lot of money spent by spectators nor anyone of his friends nor anyone from the UPA not come up with 30g's? LMAO, its not like its millions of dollars to begin with. When people like this say they can't come up with that amount of money, they are lying and simply don't want to pay it.
This was your answer:
JAM said:
If it's such a paltry amount, why don't you hand it over? You're such a big mouth and a braggart. Yesterday, you had to post to all how you have a college education, make six figures, and don't reconcile your checking account and only look at your brokerage accounts.
You post pictures on this forum of what you do during the day, which fast foot restaurant your six-figure salary takes you to, what your desk looks like, what the inside of your car looks like. I mean, my God, what's next? Are we going to see what your favorite urinal looks like?
If 30K is such an easy amount to acquire, then put it up or shut up.
JAM
In THIS thread there is no doubt that YOU started with namecalling. For that I gave you bad rep.
You then responded by giving me bad rep for this post:
Roy Steffensen said:
I am pretty sure that Chuck knew that he had not the funds atleast 1 week before the tournament started.
It would be a lot cheaper for him to cancel the event...
I can't feel sorry him...
*Next time anyone wants to guarantee added money, especially of the size of 25 000, make sure it requires a minimum numbers of entries, f.example a full field of 128...
And this was your comment when giving me bad rep:
"It is okay for others to use "crack pipe" comments to me, and when I respond, you give me red rep? Right back at you. You in the past joined TheOne, Corvette, Watchez, and others against me. Your true colors are revealed once again."
1. You have obviously misunderstood the whole concept of reps, or you actually mean that my post was not good. I guess you don't disagree with what I wrote. Was it some sort of "revenge" by giving me bad rep, since I gave to you? After all, I felt that I had a reason for it. You started a fight with Corvette for no reason, and I felt you crossed a line.
2. You write that I have joined several others posters in the past, against you. The last time I got bad rep (and only other time) was also from you, in a thread about Ortmann after he won the World 14-1 Championship. You and me had an argument about open/closed tournaments in Europe, and European buckingham-guards, if my memory are correct.
This is the only issue we have been "fighting" about, and I don't feel I crossed any lines in that discussion.
I happen to enjoy most of your posts on this forum, JAM, and I love to read your posts about stories from the past, about players you've met, tournaments you've been to, and a lot more things.
During my time on AZB I have perhaps given you green rep about 10 times, the last time about 2-3 weeks ago. I was supposed to give you green rep for another post just a couple of days ago, but I had to spread around. I am not a part of a "ban JAM group", as you like to think, and I am dissapointed that you believe so based on our different opinions about one issue.
As I just said, I happen to enjoy the majority of your posts. Unfortunately you seem to get in "trouble" with many different people on this board, on many different subjects. Instead of claiming that there excists a "ban JAM community" here on AZ, perhaps you could spend some time analyzing the posts that starts the trouble. Could it be that you are part of the problem?
In this thread, there is no doubt which post, and which person who started the war. For that I gave bad rep, and I would have given that to any person who started it, not only you.
I guess I deserved my bad rep from you for that
