One Pocket Players: Removing Balls From Jaws of Opponents Pocket

I'm hitting the long rail first....low left and sticking whitey.....lots of left.
Hopefully, the 1-ball will bank towards the far corner on your side of the table.

If the one is a tad deeper, I like coming off the short rail with a bit of left and kick-banking
the one towards the seven....and hopefully whitey runs into the fifteen and gets it outta
there.

Moving the one just a little bit still leaves you at a disadvantage.....

Yeah kicking under the one short rail is no good here. If the 1 is close to the middle of the table I might just try and spin it away with outside and try to lay on the 7.
 
The faster the cue speed, the faster the english takes. Meaning that with faster cue speed relative to the force imparted on the cue ball, the less the cue ball with slide after contact.
So you're talking about top or bottom spin? Those are the kinds that affect CB sliding.

A punch (or hard stroke or whatever you want to call it), or a forceful but slower stroke at the same contact point on the cue ball will cause the cue ball to slide more and then draw.
I don't understand this either. You seem to be saying that a faster stroke and a slower stroke can deliver the same force to the CB, but a slower stroke is less forceful by definition.

The speed of the cue has changed in these instances but I'm now relying on the mass of my arms to punch into the cue ball, rather than "throw" my cue through the cue ball with nice unhindered pendulum action.
That's reasonable thinking, but unfortunately I'm pretty sure gripping the cue tighter actually does not add the mass of your arm to the force delivered to the CB. Even with a tight grip the soft flesh in your hand "decouples" the cue and your hand/arm during contact, so the force delivered to the CB depends pretty much solely on cue speed and cue mass.

I'm sorry man but I have seen you ask many a baiting and rhetorical question on here in order to provoke these types of debates.
Thanks for the compliment. If I'm "provoking" discussion about things I see being misunderstood and misstated here, then I'm succeeding.

I understand that having your statement questioned isn't the most fun. Sorry, but I'm more concerned about seeing quality info disseminated here.

pj
chgo
 
Last edited:
I'm hitting the long rail first....low left and sticking whitey.....lots of left.
Hopefully, the 1-ball will bank towards the far corner on your side of the table.

If the one is a tad deeper, I like coming off the short rail with a bit of left and kick-banking
the one towards the seven....and hopefully whitey runs into the fifteen and gets it outta
there.

Moving the one just a little bit still leaves you at a disadvantage.....
To point out the obvious, with the OB about centered on the pocket, the difference between the long rail and short rail kicks is the CB's angle into each rail. If the CB was near the opponent's pocket, then kicking off the short rail would be easier than the long rail.

What if the OB was centered on the pocket and you could put the CB in either place? Which would you prefer? Which offers the best strategic outcome?

pj
chgo
 
To point out the obvious, with the OB about centered on the pocket, the difference between the long rail and short rail kicks is the CB's angle into each rail. If the CB was near the opponent's pocket, then kicking off the short rail would be easier than the long rail.

What if the OB was centered on the pocket and you could put the CB in either place? Which would you prefer? Which offers the best strategic outcome?

pj
chgo

I prefer kicking off the long rail 'cause I feel I can control where the one goes better.

If the seven wasn't there, I could reverse the trap by going to the short rail and getting
the one near my hole while moving the fifteen ball.
Coming off the short rail, you have to aim wide and spin it for the thinner cut on the
kick-bank....this gets the carom on the fifteen.
 
If the seven wasn't there, I could reverse the trap by going to the short rail and getting
the one near my hole while moving the fifteen ball.
Coming off the short rail, you have to aim wide and spin it for the thinner cut on the
kick-bank....this gets the carom on the fifteen.
If I was confident of hitting the 15 pretty square I'd shoot that regardless of the 7. But that's too big an if for me.

pj
chgo
 
A punch (or hard stroke or whatever you want to call it), or a forceful but slower stroke at the same contact point on the cue ball will cause the cue ball to slide more and then draw. Most people who grip the cue to tight or don't have a very good stroke in the first place tend to do the latter automatically. However, this type of stroke can be used as a tool in ones game. I personally hold the cue fairly loosely and have quite quick cue speed. I tighten my grip and paused on my backstroke for these type of shots because of this. Its much easier for me to achieve consistent results this way. The speed of the cue has changed in these instances but I'm now relying on the mass of my arms to punch into the cue ball, rather than "throw" my cue through the cue ball with nice unhindered pendulum action.

For practical purposes there are four and only four things that determine everything about how the cue ball reacts (everything about the speed and spin). They are:
1. Where you hit the cue ball.
2. The speed you hit the cue ball.
3. The elevation of your cue.
4. The weight of your cue.

So when thinking about or describing a shot, those four things (well really only the first three since the weight of the persons stick can't be changed for a shot so usually no need to even mention it) are all you need to think about or describe when explaining to someone how to hit the cue ball on a particular shot (and number 3 is generally assumed to be "as level as possible" unless stated otherwise so you usually don't have to mention that one either, which leaves just the where and at what speed).

Anything to do with grip, wrist, poke or smooth stroke, or anything else like that have zero affect on the cue ball (unless they affect one of the above things like making you hit the cue ball in a different place than you intended or think did because of a certain grip that changed your impact point for example). So in describing your shot above, all you really need to tell us was where you hit the cue ball and at what speed. The rest of the stuff makes no difference. All the cue ball knows is where it was hit, how hard, at what angle, and with what weight of cue.

If a "punch" or certain length of back stroke or how tight your grip is or any of that is having any affect on how your cue balls reacts it is only because it is changing where you are hitting the cue ball or how hard you are hitting the cue ball.
 
Sorry I don't have a picture for reference but I'll try my best to describe the situation:

Your opponent has a ball half way in the jaws of his pocket. There is still enough from to get the cue ball behind it to kick it out. You're positioned so that the cue ball would be coming into the rail behind the object ball at around 30 - 45 degrees.

My goal is to kick the object ball out and stop the cue ball in place. I usually use high english with a little inside english (toward the object ball) however more often than not once I perform the kick the cue ball rolls a few extra inches and scratches.

Do you think I'm using the wrong english or just taking the wrong kicking angle?

Set the shot up and repeat it a bunch of times until you figure it out.
 
If I was confident of hitting the 15 pretty square I'd shoot that regardless of the 7. But that's too big an if for me.

pj
chgo

My success rate on a Gold Crown is pretty good....
...a bit scarier for me on the quicker railed Diamond.
But the shot is worth learning....like the break, it's tricky....but by repetition, you get to own it.
 
Back
Top