The only way Paypal releases the funds is after the buyer gets an e-mail from Paypal asking if the item was received. Until the buyer responds, the seller has to wait for release of the funds, or ten business days (approx.)without the buyer responding......which ever comes first. CLARIFICATION: That hold on funds is with e-bay purchases and the sale item/identity is known to exist.
I dunno, I've still never seen that happen before. And not really relevant to this topic since eBay sales aren't able to be purchased as a gift option
And keep in mind that the offer of a gift or as a purchase is ultimately decided by the buyer, not the seller. So before assuming the moral high ground on this one, the sellers that make this offer, such as I recently did, are complicit but the buyer is the one that pulls the trigger. If everyone just responded to offers of a gift or purchase always as a purchase, this would be an academic issue......no one would be using the gift option.
Also not entirely right, I'll keep my ground thanks

I sold a set of wheels once for $1,100. The guy sent the money as a gift even after I told him I would cover the fees. I sent it back to him and asked him to re-submit as "goods".
Sending it back gave him time to decide he probably should've spent that money more wisely than on a set of wheels, and ultimately it took me about another 6 months to sell them and in the end I only got $800.
So I lost $300 and waited another 6 months, but I still felt I made the right choice. But that's just me.
Come-on now.....are you naive to think that Paypal would not hold the money a little longer than needed.......do you comprehend the significance between clearing house funds and federal funds (book balances vs collected balances) and its value relationship to selling funds overnite thru the Fed as day loans......just 1-2 days delay on releasing the funds to you nets Paypal huge profits. And please do not talk about morals when it comes to Banking. The long business history of banking is notoriously immoral....doubt me? Ever hear of Andrew Mellon, Rockefeller, even Alexander Hamilton was not without sin and how about even today with Jamie Dimon, CEO, Morgan Chase Bank......Duh?
Oh, I'm sure they hold it longer than needed, my bank isn't the one who takes 4 days to complete a transfer. I'm not saying they don't, what I'm saying is they don't hold it until someone says "It's cool PP, I got my stuff" on every transaction.
The point is, I don't care if PP finds a way to make 100% profit on the money I send through them. Congrats to them for having a successful business. Does there profit margin have anything to do with my side of the transaction? Not at all.
I still agreed on the cut they'd get for their services when I signed up.
Just because we're talking about a historically corrupt field of business, doesn't mean it's okay for me to leave my morals at the door.
For the same reason I'm not returning the condescending jabs you take at my intelligence/naivety while I'm just trying to have a friendly debate.
Will it significantly change the outcome? Nope.
Will it make me feel better about myself? Not really.
If the buyer wants to pay as a gift, that's their decision.
I'll refer you to my story from the second response above.
I have no interest in risking my account status.
When PP suspends your ability to receive (legitimate) gift payments, you're going to tell them it's not your fault because you didn't ask for it that way?
You accepted the payment and shipped the item, you've got equal responsibility there too