Perfect aim - review

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clark_the_Shark said:
PJ... I think the part that you might have missinterpreted is that your eyes aren't necessarily over the line formed by the edges of the CB/OB (Unless they are thin cuts to either side) The eyes go over the line of the shot, whether it be through the center of the cue ball to a portion of the OB, or their respective edges.
Click to expand...

That's what I expected the video to say, so I was looking for it, but it's pretty specific about using the CB's edge - this is one of the omissions I disliked. I think you must be inferring somehow, but I can see how that's possible - frankly, the discussions about this stuff here on AZB have been more complete, reviewing all the various possibilities. Gene is very emphatic on the video that his chosen way is the only way and all other ways are bogus - that's another thing I disliked.

pj
chgo
 
Patrick Johnson said:
I've tried it many times, along with all the alternative versions of it that been discussed multiple times right here on AZB. These are common ideas that have been around since long before Gene tried to sell this one as his own.

But the real reason I described it is that a review of the video would be meaningless without some indication of the contents. The fact that my quick and simple description includes so much of the contents of the video is not the result of me overstepping any ethical (or legal) review boundaries; it's the result of there being so little content in the video to begin with.



Empty "testimonials" is what we've had up to now in the hundreds of posts in multiple threads, and it hasn't helped anybody really assess the usefulness or quality of the product. The outpouring of thanks I've received since posting the review shows that people weren't getting the info they needed to know what to expect from the video.


And, by the way, I still haven't heard any specific examples from the complaineers of anything I got wrong or anything important I missed. Are they demonstrating the "biased bashing" they complain of? I'm sure it's just for educational purposes...

pj
chgo
Click to expand...



So Let me get this straight!!! We have hundreds of testomonials , But yours (review), Is the one we should listen to? Now I know why Spider has had it with you!

So we have hundreds of people who claim they improved their game from the dvd ( pooly done or not).

Yet no one,from your side of the fence, claims to have improved their game from reading your review! Hmmmm! I think Gene still has you beat!!!
 
9ball said:
Yet no one,from your side of the fence, claims to have improved their game from reading your review! Hmmmm! I think Gene still has you beat!!!
Click to expand...


Well that could be because the REVIEW is only a FEW DAY OLD!!!! People need time to try it IMHO.
 
Spidey:
how about IF I'm able to go into great detail about what you got wrong in your posted technique - you perma ban yourself.
Click to expand...
How about you just say whatever you have to say like the adult you claim to be?

pj
chgo
Click to expand...
I said it in my first post. You're an asshole.
Click to expand...
Oh, I see. When you said "great detail about what you got wrong" I thought you meant great detail about what I got wrong. Didn't realize it was Spidey-speak.

pj
chgo
 
We have hundreds of testomonials , But yours (review), Is the one we should listen to?
Click to expand...

I haven't said who you should listen to. If you think "I liked it" is more informative and reliable than what I posted, that's your choice. Now you have one.

pj
chgo
 
9ball said:
So Let me get this straight!!! We have hundreds of testomonials , But yours (review), Is the one we should listen to? Now I know why Spider has had it with you!

So we have hundreds of people who claim they improved their game from the dvd ( pooly done or not).

Yet no one,from your side of the fence, claims to have improved their game from reading your review! Hmmmm! I think Gene still has you beat!!!
Click to expand...

you misinterpret that? He said a "REVIEW".

Everything i've seen were simply "it helped my game" no specifics nothing.
 
Patrick Johnson said:
That's what I expected the video to say, so I was looking for it, but it's pretty specific about using the CB's edge - this is one of the omissions I disliked. I think you must be inferring somehow, but I can see how that's possible - frankly, the discussions about this stuff here on AZB have been more complete, reviewing all the various possibilities. Gene is very emphatic on the video that his chosen way is the only way and all other ways are bogus - that's another thing I disliked.

pj
chgo
Click to expand...

This is the part I had to call Gene up myself and ask... he is NOT referring to the edge of the Balls when he talks about the edge of the shot... THAT is what is SO confusing! I didn't infer, I had to call him to clarify.
 
Patrick Johnson said:
I haven't said who you should listen to. If you think "I liked it" is more informative and reliable than what I posted, that's your choice. Now you have one.

pj
chgo
Click to expand...

I always had one! I didn`t need your stupid amatuerish review to make up my mind. I pride myself in being able to think for myself and not needing someone to help me make a decision! Your eyes are blind, your mind is blind and your leading the blind!

By the way this is just my review of your review. Don`t take it personally.:grin: I have a right to my opinion right?:smile:
 
Patrick Johnson said:
Oh, I see. When you said "great detail about what you got wrong" I thought you meant great detail about what I got wrong. Didn't realize it was Spidey-speak.

pj
chgo
Click to expand...

Re-read post 61 or wherever my first large post was. I called your move long before you pulled it. I'm not posting the REST of Gene's info unless I'm getting something out of it...i.e. you vamosing outta here.
 
SUPERSTAR said:
Ok, THIS, was funny as chit! LOL
Click to expand...

Here's something to help you remove your lips from his c**k:

Goo_gone.jpg


THAT'S funny as chit! LOL
 
Last edited:
CocoboloCowboy said:
Like a Dinning Critic writing a Review of a Place to Eat.
Click to expand...

Would you listen to a Dining Critic's Review if he only ordered the food, but didn't actually eat it the way it was intended to be ate?

I think by the sound of crickets coming from Patrick on everyones question if he even got to a table and did what Gene instructed, and if he didn't understand, did he call Gene directly and ask for further help! We know the answer.

I saw the first video and if I had a bad attitude going in and didn't actually do the techniques at the table, probably would have thought the same things that the non-believers are posting in here. BUT, I did take the lesson from Gene personally and was able to ask the questions that I didn't understand. I also spoke to Gene on the phone about further questions and shots. The first thing I did (at the table) was find out which eye dominant I was on various different shots and by how much. From there I was able to take his techniques in identifying if I was lined up correctly or not. It took 5 - 10 minutes on each different type of shot to get aligned correctly and see that I was correct. After an hour of practicing, I got setup on various difficult shots and knew 100% when I used the techniques that I was going to drill the shots.

And like many people that I also know have the DVD and/or took the lessons, when I was done with the lesson my eyes were exhausted. It took me another full day of practicing to get my eyes to learn the technique without feeling cross-eyed afterwards. Now months later there are many shots that I get down on and can align easily and feel much more confident in the shot. Many of the shots that I have really improved on are the Weak Side shots.
 
SpiderWebComm said:
Here's something to help you remove your lips from his c**k:

Goo_gone.jpg


THAT'S funny as chit! LOL
Click to expand...

I take it you don't like losing huh. LOL

It WAS funny. You said one thing, he responded, and you insulted him without ever following through with what you originally said. A nice example of how NOT to argue.

If you are so gun ho about this whole thread, i highly doubt you would reveal any info that hasn't been said already.

If you ARE willing to reveal more info that is on the DVD, then you are no better then the people you accuse of knocking Geno, and you know this.

AS such, don't be pissed at me if you talked yourself into a corner and can't follow through without making yourself look bad, and don't be pissed off if other people see that you talked yourself into a corner, and laugh about it.
 
stuckart:
the sound of crickets coming from Patrick on everyones question if he even got to a table and did what Gene instructed
Click to expand...

I answered that awhile ago - yes, I've tried the technique and even use it occasionally (along with other techniques). It's not new.

and if he didn't understand, did he call Gene directly and ask for further help! We know the answer.
Click to expand...

The video is not clearly organized or presented, but I got it all first time through. It kinda surprises me that anybody didn't.

pj
chgo
 
SpiderWebComm said:
When called out, he throws the ball back into your court to explain what he doesn't understand and I never bring him up to speed because quite frankly --- he's a dick (and this thread proves it).
Click to expand...

I talked myself into a corner? I called his move on post 62. I'm not posting the rest of Gene's info nor did I post myself into a corner. I will post the info if PJ wants to bet that his post was accurate. I'd never out Gene otherwise. PJ isn't smart enough to talk me into any corner. Send your boy in - live up to your name.
 
Last edited:
SpiderWebComm said:
I talked myself into a corner? I called his move on post 62. I'm not posting the rest of Gene's info nor did I post myself into a corner. I will post the info if PJ wants to bet that his post was accurate. I'd never out Gene otherwise. PJ isn't smart enough to talk me into any corner. Send your boy in - live up to your name.
Click to expand...

Wow! Did you actually just say that you would do exactly what you are accusing PJ of doing, if you get something for it?

:eek:

Steve
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top