de luna lost to navarrete in a total choke show
it seems big name pinoys struggle in the home country
it seems big name pinoys struggle in the home country
I just must have watched one of the most inept performances ever in a major tournament. The match (and I'm being generous to call it that) between De Luna and Navarrete was a snoozefest from start to finish, one miss after another and poorly played position shots in between. I hestitate to call either of these guys pros, since any good amateur player would overwhelm them.
De Luna's game has slipped more in the last decade than any pro I can ever remember. He's gone from being a top player to a complete non entity in the pool world, hanging on by reputation alone. Neither guy could run out with five or more balls on the table and they were both missing relative hangers. De Luna would labor over easy shots, looking at it from every angle and acting like there was some problem in making the ball and playing position. Often he was right, as he would then butcher the shot. Late in the match he had BIH with all the balls out in the open. He studied the table at length and decided a safety was a better option. He then made a mess of a simple safety and gave Navarrete a wide open shot. Stunning is all I can say.
In the final game De Luna got BIH again with five open balls and made it look like he was climbing Mt. Everest. And it was! He hung up and easy, short eight ball to hand the match to Navarrete.
If you don't believe me, watch this one on Youtube. I dare you to sit through all nineteen games. That's how bad it was.
The No Names are crushing! So many of these guys were just waiting for a chance to play in a major (big money) event. The big guns in this field will all have their hands full to reach the final eight and then the final four. More will be falling along the way. Welcome to the Philippines!de luna lost to navarrete in a total choke show
it seems big name pinoys struggle in the home country
I think what’s happening here is a mix-up between ex-ante and ex-post ideas of fairness.I think there is some inherent unfairness in some people getting to lose twice before being out of the tournament while others are ousted from the event on their first loss (wherever that cutoff point happens), so there is some tradeoff. I don't think anyone really disagrees that that is technically the case either (?), some just see it as a super tiny thing and others are slightly more bothered.
I'm ok with true double elimination, double elimination that transitions to single at some midway point, double elimination with just a single elimination finals, or a true single elimination event (although noticeably less fond of the latter than the others). They all have their benefits, especially at certain times, and I think I kind of like that we have the variety, at least for the pro events, but technically some are a bit more fair in the truest sense than others.
In a multi-stage event, a loss in the qualifying Stage 1 is a "so what?" It's two different tournaments.I think what’s happening here is a mix-up between ex-ante and ex-post ideas of fairness.
Ex-ante (before the fact) fairness looks at the structure everyone faces at the start--what John Rawls would call the “veil of ignorance” perspective. From that view, a double-elimination event with a one-match final is completely fair: every player starts with the same two-loss allowance and the same path to reach the finals either clean or with one loss.
Ex-post (after the fact) fairness looks backward once we know who’s undefeated and who isn’t and says, “but that feels uneven now.” That’s the trap. It confuses equal opportunity before play begins with equal outcomes after the bracket unfolds. It’s basically a form of hindsight bias.
If you design the event so that everyone knows from the outset the final is a single race, that rule applies equally to all players. By ex-ante standards, that’s as fair as any format gets. The fact that the final happens to be one match long doesn’t make it less fair — it just makes it the smallest possible single-elimination stage.
moritz is another victim to a no name. krause hanging on by a thread..
Necessity is the mother of invention.Love how random pinoys are destroying ppl
This is distinctly possible. Pro pool must do a better job of scheduling its majors, because they've made burnout too big an issue.I bet Moritz and Chua, among others, are a bit worn down by all their recent play. That's why Yapp skipped The Philippines Open and Qatar.
I bet Moritz and Chua, among others, are a bit worn down by all their recent play. That's why Yapp skipped The Philippines Open and Qatar.
Chua is going to Qatar. Now he has 5-6 days to rest.
David looks to be in good form. A tough test for Jaybee.krause pulled through.
the herd of star players is thinned, as many suspected. the spaniards are doing well though, and alcaide will be playing jaybee sucal tomorrow on TV1 (and likely a dozen pirate streams on tiktok etc). expect big crowds
To your point, most of the big events the last two months have been in Asia. But Asia is, uh, a big place!This is distinctly possible. Pro pool must do a better job of scheduling its majors, because they've made burnout too big an issue.
It seems every other event Matchroom put on is a “Major Event.” It really diminishes what that title stands for in my opinion.