This is what I was looking for. I predicted you would be the one who would give the greatest clarification. Ok, at a minimum, it is what I hoped would be said about slide and draw. :smile:
I think also about force-follow, where perhaps the cue ball is hit with force-follow toward a rail and when the cue ball hits the rail, the cue ball bounces off a short distance with the force-follow still in tact and momentarily sits there, spinning with forward rotation and slipping, not sliding; but that's different as well.
The back-spin example at least has a forward momentum going for itself, unlike the slipping, force-follow example above.
To confess, I was the other person who whined that when the cue ball had back-spin on the cue ball, it was not sliding. I always considered the cue ball sliding when it had no back spin and no forward roll. The other person, a good friend, wailed a way at me and complained that the cue ball even with draw was sliding. We had a bet that we would make declarations (about how wrong we were) to ten different people at ten different times if one of us was wrong. Now, maybe both of us have an excuse for weaseling out of the bet.![]()
Thanks,
to me when the force follow cue ball comes off the rail it is spinning as if hit with draw ie moving forward (away from the rail) but spinning backward)towards the rail) if draw is sliding then your force follow shot would also be sliding
jmho
icbw
p.s. i would have voted for only balls with no spin are sliding