If there is a definite difference in playability between production and custom cues I'm not good enough to detect it. I guess the people who routinely run 200 balls in straight pool may have such a fine touch that any tiny difference in balance point etc is a big deal, but I've asked all the top players I know what cue they use, and I've even gotten to shoot with most of them. They are mostly pretty "vanilla" production cues.
I've met a lot of people that put a lot of faith in the difference between cues. Some of them are better players than me, but the majority are worse. Most of the really good players are kind of neutral on the subject. There is a difference, but overall it's not that important to them. You certainly won't see many of them with 5k or 10k cues, even if they can afford them. A few of the great players change cues quite often, but their level of play stays pretty much the same...That goes for the terrible players as well...Give a great player a house cue, and he will run racks on you. Give a D player a house cue and he will continue to drive balls into the rail. There is no mystery to it. It's a decorated pointed stick. Pointed sticks came before the wheel was invented. Even monkeys use sticks.
I got my butt kicked today on the snooker table by a guy who routinely makes century breaks. He plays with a cheap cue, and he says there is no difference between it and more expensive ones. Since his stroke and touch by far exceed most peoples, including mine, who are they to overrule his judgement? He's tried every major snooker cue brand, btw.
I've tried some cues that were so terrible that it was difficult to make routine shots. Those usually have something seriously wrong with their construction. A loose ferrule, joint screw, joint collar etc can make a big difference, as well as a severely warped shaft or busted up tips etc, but 96% of cues with a good tip on them will pretty much do anything I'm capable of on the table. Some cues may feel "better", but that is purely subjective, at least I can't get any of the cue "experts" to agree on what cue is the best, and if you wait 2 months they will no longer be in agreement with themselves..
Deflection etc is just a matter of what you are used to. I'm used to ld shafts, so they play "better" for me. If I took the time to adjust, I'm sure I'd play equally well with a maple shaft. Some custom cues have unreasonably large deflection, and I have a hard time seeing what the upside to that may be, but overall it's not a big factor.
The custom cue guys are willing to pay 1000 dollars for a shaft of snow white or dark, flawless maple. I can understand why someone would be willing to pay extra for "perfection", or even brag about their ability to do so, but when they claim that the playability of their shafts exceed anything else on the market..well it's hard to take them seriously. I'd like to see someone try to prove that. And why is it that the people with 10k cues are not spamming the straight pool challenge or ghost challenge with their awesome runs? I guess they must be modest?
