I own one and it is a thing of beauty and an amazing player.
Who cares if someone builds a cue like someone else. Unless it is a huge collector/museum piece that was obviously the crowning achievement of someone's cue making career, it is just another cue. If the cuemaker copyrighted/patented his design like the Lambros Ultra Joint, then it might matter. If not, why should it?
I could go out and take a Gina and match it 100% and sell it in any way I chose. I'm still not building a Gina cue. I'm building an Antfarm cue that would have my signature on it. I wouldn't say it was a Gina cue. I might say it was a Gina tribute. But then, I'm giving credit to Gina for the design.
Bottom line, it doesn't matter.
Greg
It does matter. It matters more or less depending on the perspective you are looking at the issue from.
If you are the person who spent a lot of time to figure out something that has never been done before then you naturally would not like to see it copied ever. And if it does get copied then you certainly don't want to see other people taking credit for the design as if they invented it.
If you are the guy who doesn't have $5000 to spend on a high end cue then you are not so concerned with copies of $5000 cues as long as you can get them for $500.
If you're the company that is poised to put 20 million into a marketing campaign for your new super widget you don't want to see another company getting the jump on you with the half-priced copy.
If you're the customer standing in Best Buy then you want the largest selection of Super Widgets possible and who copied who is not on your mind.
The fact of is that designers are driven by ego. Their (and mine) sense of self-worth comes from the amount of praise they get from their creations. It HURTS a lot when someone copies your work substantially and they get praise for it and don't mention you.
I have always been one to mention WHERE I get inspiration from and why. I enjoy talking about what inspired me and what changes I made and why I made them. I am a huge huge huge case geek. Because of this I respect my peers SO MUCH that I will only take what I think is the very best of what they do. And when I do I will give them credit and encourage people to buy from them and really just pretty much try hard to work within the belief that there is enough room for all of us to co-exist and build off each other.
When you sit in the show room of a big importer and you are talking about how many cases they will order and you see that they have four pages dedicated to copies of your work as I have then it really hurts. It's not the same as when Porper decides to take a main element of my most popular case. That hurts but it's also a HUGE compliment. But when your own customers bring in dead-nuts copies of your work then it's brutal. Especially when you must continue dealing with them because you depend on their orders.
Has nothing to do with legality. It's just a major slap in the face. And it's a dance in business that never ends.
So yes, copying matters. To what degree is the question. My current philosophy on it is that it's part of the cycle of life. It's nothing new. In all societies through recorded history that which is popular and successful and desirable has been copied.