I hope your not quoting this PPV as one against the UFC because this one was HORRIBLE. 2 quick fights and 90 minutes before the main event? We couldn't see that fight they where blabbing about behind them really?? UFC if they are between time will show a fight that might have went quick or fight something else in. UFC have very bad cards. But come on a fight of this hype (24 /7 is an excellent series to show that I am not 100% ufc biased... ) but the amount of talk was crazy. Great I'm paying 10 bucks over for HD and I pay to watch Larry Merchant blab on and on.
thebigdog said:I disagree with that statement. I have regretted every PPV UFC fight I have paid for. Boxing does have its share of duds but then you get that one great fight that sucks you back into the sport. The most recent was the Margarito-Cotto fight a few months back. UFC is pretty boring to me, and the way I see it that sport is resembling WWE more every day.
I have Direct TV and had to pay an extra $10 to get the fight in HD. Am I the only one who is really pissed off about that? I know that I pay an extra $10 a month per HD reciever on my account. Since I pay for these receivers shouldn't I get all programs in HD that are offered. They pulled the same move the NFL Sunday ticket package selling the package for one price and then only giving the games in standard definition after the first week, I had to pay an extra $100 to be able to watch the games in HD. Do companies like comcast charge extra for PPV programs in HD as well?