rukiddingme said:The silence is deafening...
ruk
Flex said:Just imagine the sound of a check dropping on a plush carpet, for just one second.... shhhhhhh.......
Da Poet said:Does anyone know, or at liberty to disclose word for word what the written mutually agreed contract payment terms are for these IPT players?
jjinfla said:Payday is the 1st of the month.
JJJ
jjinfla said:I don't think there ever was a contract.
It was based on trust.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha ha ha
It has only been 17 days.
Payday is the 1st of the month.
JJJ
Purdman said:I have heard that several players here at the Open have recieved checks. That, if it is true, is wonderful news.
Purdman![]()
I will ask some players tomorrow morning.
av84fun said:<<I think the website could be construed as a conract. The catch is that players would have had to print it out in case it changes.>>
Trust me, there is a "oral contract" which is just as enforceable as a written one so long as the terms of payment can be shown (which they obviously can be) and there has been substantial performance by both parties which can also be clearly shown. There is no court in America that would rule that there is no binding contract.
"An oral contract is a contract that terms of which have been agreed by spoken communication, in contrast to a written contract, where the contract is a written document. There may be written, or other physical evidence, of an oral contract -- for example where the parties write down what they have agreed -- but the contract itself is not a written one."
jimmyg said:Yes, oral contracts MAY be legal and binding just as written contracts also MAY be legal and binding, but neither is always so. There are several "elements" to a legally binding contract (oral or written), one of the elements, which is subject to interpretation, is that there must be a "meeting of the minds": the parties must agree to the same things, in the same sense and at the same time. Those questions have had to be settled in courts of law for a very long time.
Even without seeing and hearing all the written and taped explanations of the IPT's so called "guarantees", I'd be willing to bet that KT's attorneys already have that one covered.
Besides, in the event of insolvency and bankruptcy, other than taxes most debts in excess of assets are voided. If this thing goes in that direction, unfortunately, creditors will probably collect nothing.