i know this goes without say, but damn, what a difference great equipment makes.
i was at a friends house last night playing. he is super tedious(sp?) with the up keep of his table. he's even put reinforements under his table to make sure the slate is as perfectly level as possible. he has a ball cleaner!!!LOL brunswick table by the way. the pockets were 4 3/4 with the sides right at 5. we played for 11 hours. 8 ball, 9 ball, 1 hole, straight pool, then two races to 21 in 9 ball. where i practice daily during the week has very good tables, but they get played on all the time by anyone and everyone, so of course they play good, but still the cloth gets worn, the rails are kinda funny from time to time. but what a difference it was. the balls rolled perfectly true, the rails weren't "boingy" and cue would kill off the rail if you wanted it to, or run off the rail if you wanted it to. where i normally would use a tip of sidespin, a quarter or half tip would do plenty, a max draw would go almost a length and a half of the table.(i had to be very careful here, as i over drew the cue for about the first 45 min) he also had his table set up for a sardo.
point being, is my play improved considerably. we both ran out plenty of times, a couple times we managed to string together a few racks. i had a couple 2's and a 3. he had about the same with a 4 pack mixed in.
couple questions here:
is it better to try to practice on super good equipment, or average equipment? ( i see a small advantage to practicing on average equipment, because it seems to let you adapt to other playing conditions easier. its a good medium between great equipment and bad)
also, is the sardo rack the reason for the alternating break format?
it was TOO EASY to make 1-3 balls on the break and kill the cue. if the two of us can put together racks, then a pro would be able to get 6 or 7 ahead on a regular bases before the opponent got out the chair in a winner break format. i guess there is such a thing as too perfect.
and lastly, has anyone else noticed that the aramith t.v. balls cut more than the brunswick centennials? i've played on two different tables with two different sets of aramiths, and they seem to cut a slight bit more. it did seem that the aramiths stayed a little cleaner, where as centennials seemed to get dirty quicker, which may have contributed to it.
thanks
i was at a friends house last night playing. he is super tedious(sp?) with the up keep of his table. he's even put reinforements under his table to make sure the slate is as perfectly level as possible. he has a ball cleaner!!!LOL brunswick table by the way. the pockets were 4 3/4 with the sides right at 5. we played for 11 hours. 8 ball, 9 ball, 1 hole, straight pool, then two races to 21 in 9 ball. where i practice daily during the week has very good tables, but they get played on all the time by anyone and everyone, so of course they play good, but still the cloth gets worn, the rails are kinda funny from time to time. but what a difference it was. the balls rolled perfectly true, the rails weren't "boingy" and cue would kill off the rail if you wanted it to, or run off the rail if you wanted it to. where i normally would use a tip of sidespin, a quarter or half tip would do plenty, a max draw would go almost a length and a half of the table.(i had to be very careful here, as i over drew the cue for about the first 45 min) he also had his table set up for a sardo.
point being, is my play improved considerably. we both ran out plenty of times, a couple times we managed to string together a few racks. i had a couple 2's and a 3. he had about the same with a 4 pack mixed in.
couple questions here:
is it better to try to practice on super good equipment, or average equipment? ( i see a small advantage to practicing on average equipment, because it seems to let you adapt to other playing conditions easier. its a good medium between great equipment and bad)
also, is the sardo rack the reason for the alternating break format?
it was TOO EASY to make 1-3 balls on the break and kill the cue. if the two of us can put together racks, then a pro would be able to get 6 or 7 ahead on a regular bases before the opponent got out the chair in a winner break format. i guess there is such a thing as too perfect.
and lastly, has anyone else noticed that the aramith t.v. balls cut more than the brunswick centennials? i've played on two different tables with two different sets of aramiths, and they seem to cut a slight bit more. it did seem that the aramiths stayed a little cleaner, where as centennials seemed to get dirty quicker, which may have contributed to it.
thanks