Predator Revo shaft full review and deflection test

I welcome new technology and I love black :p

But why on goods green earth somebody in this day in age would manufacture a high end shaft with only 12,9mm I cannot understand.
Most are playing 11,75 or 11,5 even. Cloth is rather fast and control and finesse instead of strength is needed.

I personally love my 9mm Snooker shaft and boy is it easy to shoot due to increased sighting.

If you blow money ... take Mezz or Exceed. At least a solid company is behind it.

Cheers,
M

Maybe they tried all different sizes and 12.9mm is what worked the BEST and they set up their machinery to manufacture that size.

Just because something works at one size, doesn't mean it will work as well as another size and hold up as well. They not only have to make sure it works, they have to make sure it will last more than a month or two before it falls apart. The thinner the shaft, the thinner the walls of the shaft.

If pros can't adapt to different sizes, then maybe they aren't "pros".

The Taiwanese pros are among the BEST in the world and many of them use regular maple shafts that are 13mm and larger.

Most of the "pros" aren't spending tons of money on equipment...it is the APA players and weekend players that are spending the money. Predator doesn't have to cater to the "pros". How MANY pros have you seen using it? 5, 7, 10?

I'm not advocating that people shouldn't use whatever size shaft they want that is available, but I don't think every company believes they should retool to make every size an individual wants.

Now that it is out, there will be TONS of copycats that may work even better coming out in the future. Some of them may compete by make different sizes if the Predator becomes a big seller.
 
On the other revo thread, it was exposed that predator made a revo in 12.0 mm for Bob J.

http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?p=5579595#post5579595

This proves that not only does predator have the capabilities of modifying size of revo but not telling the public about it.

I personally believe it is not logical to think that a professional player who has been locked into a certain size of shaft for years will make a transition to a 12.9mm and play just as well with it.

I also suspect that the early revo shafts made for some pros were also of varying sizes to accommodate them. I would like to get Darren Appleton to weigh in on the tip diameter he was given and if it was modified or built to his specs.

But for Predator and others to push a narrative that you should just buy it and get used to it at 12.mm is absurd.

I agree 100%, BUT there is one thing you may be overlooking.

The possibility that the 12.9mm really does give the best results.

If Bob has a 12.0mm Revo, it could be the best playing Predator shaft he's ever used, but the 12.9mm could play even better.

Make sense?

Now if a 12.0mm, 11.4mm, or 12.5mm Revo shaft all plays exactly the same, then Predator is being pretty shady.
 
I think have have started at the larger size to suite the majority of people who like 13mm shafts. Later they will be making them down to 11.5 possibly smaller, depending if they can swing the market from wood to composite cue shafts.
Neil
 
Here's a theory. May be a bullshit one but I'll posit it for critique. I can't shoot with a Z2. I love the 314-2. Difference? The Z2 is so low deflection that I miss due to swerve rather than squirt. I grew up with standard maple so I don't have whatever it takes to compensate for the Z2. So is it possible that a Revo with a much smaller diameter shaft/tip would, due to decreased mass, be so low squirt that it would cause the opposite extreme of swerve, especially on soft shots with lots of sidespin?
 
I agree 100%, BUT there is one thing you may be overlooking.

The possibility that the 12.9mm really does give the best results.

If Bob has a 12.0mm Revo, it could be the best playing Predator shaft he's ever used, but the 12.9mm could play even better.

Make sense?

Now if a 12.0mm, 11.4mm, or 12.5mm Revo shaft all plays exactly the same, then Predator is being pretty shady.

Yes, that makes absolute sense regarding the best results at 12.9mm. If that is the case then I'll apologize to predator for doubting them. Your last sentence is what is on my mind as well.

If going by the chronological order of information which was put out there...
January 2016 - learned from a rep with prototype that the plan was to have a fully customizable shaft made to specifications in size and weight.
April 2016 - SBE reps displaying the revo at 12.9mm saying no plans for different sizes in the foreseeable future.
June 2016 - verification that at 12.0 Revo is made.

I think it's about time to make another phone call to the company. I'll see what I can find out tomorrow. (To be continued...) :thumbup:
 
If pros can't adapt to different sizes, then maybe they aren't "pros".

Not sure I will second this. Also about thinner shafts having thinner walls as it's not my understanding about manufacturing.
A "the manufacturer knows best" attitude is not something I have, because their decision seldomly are based on the best interest of the user.

And boy, has J. Ouschan played clumsily with the new Revo shaft!

Cardigan Kid's post also makes you think. That's not the behaviour of a solid company at all.

Now if a 12.0mm, 11.4mm, or 12.5mm Revo shaft all plays exactly the same, then Predator is being pretty shady.

On the contrary - they would have achieved a truly consistent product and I would welcome that!

Cheers,
M
 
Could anyone tell me the natural pivot point on the revo shaft?

It depend on how much energy is used (how hard you hit it/\ and CB contact time) is what causes the sine wave "Pivot cycle point" in a shaft... like every cue shaft, it kinda varies. From a short put to a break/jump shot the true 'pivot point' will vary.

Your medium speed shots - ie say 1.5 X lag and higher on a 9ft with 860 (ie 1/2 table stop/stun type shots, medium speed and above shots with off center CB hits) causes shaft deflection that will 'help define the pivot point for that shot's energy inputs. It will be your own rehearsal as to the TRUE feel 'pivot point' for the average medium speed shots and above (maybe 30-75% of your shot type selection-force) that will qualify a pivot point for that shot selection type. All materials flex/compress and resonate depending on amount of "lateral -deflective forces" applied.

R
 
Yes, that makes absolute sense regarding the best results at 12.9mm. If that is the case then I'll apologize to predator for doubting them. Your last sentence is what is on my mind as well.

If going by the chronological order of information which was put out there...
January 2016 - learned from a rep with prototype that the plan was to have a fully customizable shaft made to specifications in size and weight.
April 2016 - SBE reps displaying the revo at 12.9mm saying no plans for different sizes in the foreseeable future.
June 2016 - verification that at 12.0 Revo is made.

I think it's about time to make another phone call to the company. I'll see what I can find out tomorrow. (To be continued...) :thumbup:

I recently got off the phone with a representative at Predator cues in order to get the most valid information regarding our discussion here on the Revo shaft.

After a twenty minute conversation, here are the answers and information passed along....
In no particular order....

- Paul Costain has spent 12 years developing the shaft which is known as the Revo. Recently, many variations have been made and sent out to various players. This will explain Bob Jewitt having a 12.0mm revo.

- the rep could not answer completely if pros are getting the standard size 12.9mm or a modified diameter Revo shaft. He did know that a player like Jasmine O has made a full switch to the Revo while others like Darren Appleton has gone through different variations of the shaft in search of settling on it. To date he only uses it for one pocket and depending on the game, will switch back to his 314-2 shafts. Again he wasn't aware of Appleton's thoughts as to if it's the diameter or taper which he won't settle on.

- the rep swears he played a Z shaft for years and was a big fan of the Z3 so he was also disappointed when they announced the decision to kick out the Revo at 12.9mm. However he says it took him about a half a month to adjust and after he did he believes a smaller diameter would be too small. He explained about the 5% taper over the first 14" and the feel is perfect. I asked about the loss of real estate on the cue ball while sighting from an 11.75mm and adjusting up to a 12.9mm and he explained that you don't need it anymore because with the Revo you play closer to center, whereas before what you would play a full tip outside, you only need half a tip because of the difference in transfer of energy.

- Paul Costain is the mad scientist that has been working on this for more than a decade and the recently converted the research facility into the manufacturing facility in Boston for the Revo. It is a small operation and they only have the capabilities of making about 500 Revo shafts a quarter. So this explains the limitations in joint selection and sizes.

- They made the decision to put it out there this year to see how the world would embrace it but in a controlled way. They didn't want someone taking a Revo and playing with it on a Players cue butt, experiencing bad results and giving it a bad review. They also were more aware that further testing needed to be done on the various joint makes, and butts to see if the Revo could produce the same results as they did with the P3 butts.

- as it stands now on the production calendar, there are no plans for any other versions of Revo up through the fiscal year of 2017. He could not say for certain that the Revo won't be introduced in smaller diameters but testing is always on going with variations having been made (explaining Bob Jewett's 12.0mm)

Again, this was all gathered through a conversation with a sales representative and information about "getting used to it" or "making the switch takes 2 weeks" is purely speculative and could be the sales part of the salesman talking. Obviously, in the professional world, some players ( like Darren) have found it tough to make the full time transition. Some conclusions can be drawn from this.

Personally, in my opinion, from the information gathered, this is still a work in progress and predator decided to recoup some expenses by converting the research facility into a small manufacturing facility, deciding on one 12.9mm diameter and taking it to market in a limited run format (500 per quarter)

This was done to see not only what the market demands in terms of varying sizes, the professionals under the predator umbrella feedback, but also to make a little back on the years of research investment. IMO they have the capabilities of varying diameter sizes, but it's not worth it to make a made to order shaft. Even though the sales rep days a 12.0mm would be too small, Bob J indicates he wishes it was smaller, so again, it's all subjective on the 12.9mm.

My thoughts are, follow Darren and see what he settled on.
This is an ongoing project for Predator and nothing is set in stone. To me it's not about the money as it is the time in adjusting to equipment and possible change/loss of game (which is more valuable). As a player, you put in the hours on the table of work, and now you must put in hours to adjust to equipment. I am no Darren Appleton, and if he can't adjust with all the powers of predator at his disposal, how could my limited abilities cope when ordering a standard size from a dealer that can't be modified?

I finished the call with congratulating predator on working to bring technology to the forefront and advancing the game. Revo is surely different and will make them some money. But I'll closely watch Darren and stick with the maple wood for now.
 
Last edited:
I recently got off the phone with a representative at Predator cues in order to get the most valid information regarding our discussion here on the Revo shaft.

After a twenty minute conversation, here are the answers and information passed along....
In no particular order....

- Paul Costain has spent 12 years developing the shaft which is known as the Revo. Recently, many variations have been made and sent out to various players. This will explain Bob Jewitt having a 12.0mm revo.

- the rep could not answer completely if pros are getting the standard size 12.9mm or a modified diameter Revo shaft. He did know that a player like Jasmine O has made a full switch to the Revo while others like Darren Appleton has gone through different variations of the shaft in search of settling on it. To date he only uses it for one pocket and depending on the game, will switch back to his 314-2 shafts. Again he wasn't aware of Appleton's thoughts as to if it's the diameter or taper which he won't settle on.

- the rep swears he played a Z shaft for years and was a big fan of the Z3 so he was also disappointed when they announced the decision to kick out the Revo at 12.9mm. However he says it took him about a half a month to adjust and after he did he believes a smaller diameter would be too small. He explained about the 5% taper over the first 14" and the feel is perfect. I asked about the loss of real estate on the cue ball while sighting from an 11.75mm and adjusting up to a 12.9mm and he explained that you don't need it anymore because with the Revo you play closer to center, whereas before what you would play a full tip outside, you only need half a tip because of the difference in transfer of energy.

- Paul Costain is the mad scientist that has been working on this for more than a decade and the recently converted the research facility into the manufacturing facility in Boston for the Revo. It is a small operation and they only have the capabilities of making about 500 Revo shafts a quarter. So this explains the limitations in joint selection and sizes.

- They made the decision to put it out there this year to see how the world would embrace it but in a controlled way. They didn't want someone taking a Revo and playing with it on a Players cue butt, experiencing bad results and giving it a bad review. They also were more aware that further testing needed to be done on the various joint makes, and butts to see if the Revo could produce the same results as they did with the P3 butts.

- as it stands now on the production calendar, there are no plans for any other versions of Revo up through the fiscal year of 2017. He could not say for certain that the Revo won't be introduced in smaller diameters but testing is always on going with variations having been made (explaining Bob Jewett's 12.0mm)

Again, this was all gathered through a conversation with a sales representative and information about "getting used to it" or "making the switch takes 2 weeks" is purely speculative and could be the sales part of the salesman talking. Obviously, in the professional world, some players ( like Darren) have found it tough to make the full time transition. Some conclusions can be drawn from this.

Personally, in my opinion, from the information gathered, this is still a work in progress and predator decided to recoup some expenses by converting the research facility into a small manufacturing facility, deciding on one 12.9mm diameter and taking it to market in a limited run format (500 per quarter)

This was done to see not only what the market demands in terms of varying sizes, the professionals under the predator umbrella feedback, but also to make a little back on the years of research investment. IMO they have the capabilities of varying diameter sizes, but it's not worth it to make a made to order shaft. Even though the sales rep days a 12.0mm would be too small, Bob J indicates he wishes it was smaller, so again, it's all subjective on the 12.9mm.

My thoughts are, follow Darren and see what he settled on.
This is an ongoing project for Predator and nothing is set in stone. To me it's not about the money as it is the time in adjusting to equipment and possible change/loss of game (which is more valuable). As a player, you put in the hours on the table of work, and now you must put in hours to adjust to equipment. I am no Darren Appleton, and if he can't adjust with all the powers of predator at his disposal, how could my limited abilities cope when ordering a standard size from a dealer that can't be modified?

I finished the call with congratulating predator on working to bring technology to the forefront and advancing the game. Revo is surely different and will make them some money. But I'll closely watch Darren and stick with the maple wood for now.

Thanks for all the info.

I find it "funny" that the rep could adjust to the shaft diameter in a couple weeks, but a banger like Darren Appleton can't seem to make it work to his satisfaction.

If there is no way to "tailor" a shaft to the preferences that you can play your best game at and you can't adapt to the new specs, then I don't know why anybody would even buy one...except for the people who just like to show off their new expensive toys.

I've played around with one for a few minutes and they play pretty good, but I don't think they will turn you into Willie Mosconi. The one thing I did like about them is that they were really smooth and supposedly ding proof. The thing I disliked most was you probably won't be able to change your tip yourself, unless you have a lathe and know what you are doing.

I prefer FAT shafts, so the 12.9mm was actually a bit small for my tastes.
 
cda3fa0c7c5be7f7ce4ef95374a0e9ab.jpg

"Step Right Up"- Tom Waits
 
Last edited:
Why would you chose to play with a LD shaft over a standard shaft then? There are known drawbacks to having an LD shaft. Ferrule durability, and overall shaft durability, combined with the increased difficulty of jumping are pretty big 'cons'. There's only one drawback to a standard shaft in the eyes of the LD crowd, the deflection. So if you're playing just as well with the standard, why limit yourself on possible shots? It'd be like Usain Bolt wearing climbing shoes for the 100m. Sure they grip the surface more, but the shoe doesn't grip you the same way so you end up slipping. Things just don't make sense.

Not sure about ferrule durability, OB never had a problem, so you can't lump everyone in the same kettle, cause if we lumped all the bad "custom" cue makers in the same kettle either.....

Jump, who jumps with a full cue anymore (Besides Earl) Durability... I have a lifetime warranty against warping on my OB shaft. So, that takes that out of the argument as well.

So, now it comes down to which is easier for a person to shoot balls with ?? For me, it's LD, for others it's non LD maple, doesn't bother me a bit that someone uses maple and wants to squirt the cb more than me, if they can make it work, good for them.
 
my take on some of the issues with the revo is change. The revo is the complete opposite to what a lot of the normal pool player are used to. its black no ferule not wood and LD. I've come across a lot of decent everyday league players that don't know anything about cues other then weight and maybe hit. I had someone I know who is a strong A player come up to me and said why are you play with a break cue I wouldn't touch that if you paid me.


I on the other hand am always on AZ reading about reviews up and coming new products. I gave in bought the REVO played about 20 hours with it so far and am wondering if I regret it

this is my overall review slash opinion and I am only a C+ B- player but have tried lots of cues

Hit no to bad sounds a little strange sometimes

THE LOOK black shaft is something to get used to you can see dirt and it can be distracting.

DEFLECTION I am already an LD shooter its low but the percent difference from other predator OB jacoby shafts it might be better but IMO not huge

THE FINISH very smooth but almost sounds strange sliding through your bridge I don't were a glove if its quite there is a sound its not bad just different.

THE TIP predator victory soft already mushrooming. glaze to quick.I don't know what tip to try cause they say soft is the way to go cause the shaft is very stiff and you need a qualified predator dealer to change the tip or it voids warranty.
 
Back
Top